Iceweasel
Diamond Member
A lot? I never heard of one. The religious aspects are why they are there.A lot of churches don't allow the religious parts of their services to be filmed. Could that be it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lot? I never heard of one. The religious aspects are why they are there.A lot of churches don't allow the religious parts of their services to be filmed. Could that be it?
LOL, maybe the media is simply exercising its moral prerogative to do what's best for the country.
IOW, patriotism.
And there you have it folks.
You are right... NO MATTER! And that's the point! Do you understand what you said?No matter. It got out there.
Why should it "Matter" how it got out? It should NOT have been an issue in the first place if Reuters et.al. MSM weren't biased in the first place!
People who continue to support the MSM are doing so because they believe like the MSM does. The best answer is Hillary and Trump is not to be trusted!
So again... It got out but boy what would happen if there was fairness in the MSM coverage so it wouldn't "have to get out"?
LOL, maybe the media is simply exercising its moral prerogative to do what's best for the country.
IOW, patriotism.
And there you have it folks.
The media have been the center of politics since this country began. They have always taken sides.
LOL, maybe the media is simply exercising its moral prerogative to do what's best for the country.
IOW, patriotism.
And there you have it folks.
The media have been the center of politics since this country began. They have always taken sides.
Taking sides is one thing. That's been the case forever. Taking sides while telling the world you're objective is quite another.
But you knew that.
Trump's comments were one thing, the church service was something else. No one was "rolling" during that, were they? When his comments "morphed" back into religious service, maybe it was time to cut the vid. I don't know; maybe it's true Reuters doesn't want Trump to look good, but I think it's kind of a silly theory. I've been to weddings, including my own, where there were NO photographs or videotaping allowed during the ceremony. We had to "pose" for all those pictures afterward. I've been to other weddings that were the same.A lot? I never heard of one. The religious aspects are why they are there.A lot of churches don't allow the religious parts of their services to be filmed. Could that be it?
LOL, maybe the media is simply exercising its moral prerogative to do what's best for the country.
IOW, patriotism.
And there you have it folks.
The media have been the center of politics since this country began. They have always taken sides.
Taking sides is one thing. That's been the case forever. Taking sides while telling the world you're objective is quite another.
But you knew that.
So Foxnews should stop calling itself fair and balanced, and get the word 'news' out of its title?
No, it was meant for Republican/Trump/regressive lemmings who form their opinions from online posts.Besides this thread wasn't meant for the Democrat/Hillary/progressive lemmings like NYCarbineer...
This was meant for the millions of cowards like me that are afraid to identify as Trump supporters on their cars or in discussions with others who
derisively start a conversation "Boy what you think of the latest Trump idiocy"??? That kind of talk immediately puts a chill on any further discussions
as it starts a dialogue with idiots who form their opinions from MSM headlines/talking heads!
LOL, maybe the media is simply exercising its moral prerogative to do what's best for the country.
IOW, patriotism.
LOL, maybe the media is simply exercising its moral prerogative to do what's best for the country.
IOW, patriotism.
That's not the media's job, their job is to report without bias. Period.
You are right... NO MATTER! And that's the point! Do you understand what you said?No matter. It got out there.
Why should it "Matter" how it got out? It should NOT have been an issue in the first place if Reuters et.al. MSM weren't biased in the first place!
People who continue to support the MSM are doing so because they believe like the MSM does. The best answer is Hillary and Trump is not to be trusted!
So again... It got out but boy what would happen if there was fairness in the MSM coverage so it wouldn't "have to get out"?
Yes, it is a given that media is locked like the Human Centipede to the Democrat backside. Live with it. It won't change anytime soon.
It is becoming more and more difficult everyday to withhold information. Truth will out eventually
Infowars? you really are desperate!'ALL-IN' LIBERAL CENSORSHIP
" A shock example of anti-Trump media censorship was caught on tape when Reuters ordered its cameraman to cut live footage of Trump receiving praise from African-American Bishop Wayne T. Jackson in Detroit."
“Shut it Down!”: Reuters Orders Cameraman to Kill Positive Trump Footage
Can't have people seeing blacks praising Trump, now can we, libs? Wouldn't want to let blacks see what's really going on and let them decide for themselves...
Thomson Reuters is a media subsidiary of a Canadian company. It is known primarily as being Canadian.
I am inclined to believe this is bullshit.
The Democrats don't like it when republicans make in-roads to their "darkies". That's the term democrats used for their slaves.