Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 73,053
- 65,070
Because nobody gives a flying fuck if you endorse anybody, while millions of people look to Dr. Paul for leadership?
'No', what? That it wouldn't be a pussy move to meekly keep quiet?
When has Dr. Paul ever put politics ahead of his convictions? Never that I know of. He's been the lone no vote on many a popular, and sometimes patriotic bill. He didn't worry about the political ramifications because in his understanding, it wasn't Constitutional.
So, why would he put his son's politics ahead of his own convictions now? Not the way to cap off a respected career.
I haven't "endorsed" anybody for President, and I don't feel like that's a "pussy move." So why shouldn't I give Ron Paul the same consideration?
Jesus!
If you are about to go retard on me, give me a heads up, please. Or was this post the heads up?