TNHarley
Diamond Member
- Sep 27, 2012
- 93,244
- 55,273
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #41
I believe its source was anonymous. The group not anonymously lolThere are some exaggerated claims of destroying most of ISIS's ammunition.Because it didn't come from CNN? lolI do not consider the source as valid. The claims are very far fetched.Did you read the OP? They also destroyed their headquarters in Syria.Well, that goes back to my original question. Does anyone have any evidence that Russia is hurting ISIS to a more significant degree than we have been hurting them? Seems the Russians are doing the same things we do only with less concern about collateral damage and very little concentration on ISIS.Because someone is actually hurting IS.
Neither did the headquarters.. I had to find it based out of the UK
I usually don't give much credibility to articles on blog sites unless they are well sourced. The claim that 86 ISIS sites were hit out of 88 targets gives a clue that the story is propaganda.Because it didn't come from CNN? lolI do not consider the source as valid. The claims are very far fetched.Did you read the OP? They also destroyed their headquarters in Syria.Well, that goes back to my original question. Does anyone have any evidence that Russia is hurting ISIS to a more significant degree than we have been hurting them? Seems the Russians are doing the same things we do only with less concern about collateral damage and very little concentration on ISIS.Because someone is actually hurting IS.
Neither did the headquarters.. I had to find it based out of the UK