Saddam's WMDs Went To Syria, Then Lebanon....

U.S. intelligence suspects Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction have finally been located.

Unfortunately, getting to them will be nearly impossible for the United States and its allies, because the containers with the strategic materials are not in Iraq.

Satellite photo of hundreds of trucks systematically leaving an Iraqi weapons dump, early 2003.


TRUCKSsyria-iraq-wmd11-300x184.jpg


Instead they are located in Lebanon’s heavily-fortified Bekaa Valley, swarming with Iranian and Syrian forces, and Hizbullah and ex-Iraqi agents, Geostrategy-Direct.com will report in Wednesday’s (Sept. 2, 2003) weekly edition.

U.S. intelligence first identified a stream of tractor-trailer trucks moving from Iraq to Syria to Lebanon in January 2003. The significance of this sighting did not register on the CIA at the time.

U.S. intelligence sources believe the area contains extended-range Scud-based missiles and parts for chemical and biological warheads.

Mutually-lucrative Iraqi-Syrian arms transactions are nothing new. Firas Tlas, son of Syrian Defense Minister Mustafa Tlas, has been the key to Syria’s rogue alliance with Iraq. He and Assad made hundreds of millions of dollars selling weapons, oil and drugs to and from Iraq, according to the May 13, 2003 edition of Geostrategy-Direct.com.

The CIA now believes a multi-million dollar deal between Iraq and Syria provided for the hiding and safekeeping of Saddam’s strategic weapons.

Not surprisingly, U.S. inquiries in Beirut and Syria are being met with little substantive response, U.S. officials said.


FLASHBACK Where did Saddam s WMD go To Syria ... - World Tribune World Tribune

We were promised there would be nuclear weapons, actual weapons of mass destruction. I wonder where they went?
 
Imbecile.... not one of those quotes extended the war. The war took as long as it did because we had an idiot as commander-in-chief who ignored advice and neglected to send in sufficient troops to squash the insurgency which follows Shock and Awe.
Only a simple minded party hack would post that,The media and our not so honorable Dems most certainly made things worse,more live lost more destruction.One would have to openly lie or have head so far up ons ass to think otherwise.
Oh? How did their words cost lives and make things worse?

Did you read the Harvard study above?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.

But you idiots don't get it do you?
Why are you writing crap? What purpose does your writing words do?
Obviously you want to influence people's thinking why else are you are this forum?
So that be obvious...YOU use words to influence people to action!
These words influenced ACTIONS!!
Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

You accuse Bush of USING words to LIE to people! Bush's words influenced actions!
Well the above idiots KNOWING the power of their words went ahead and called our troops "terrorists".."civilian killers"..."Nazis"..."cold blooded killers"!
You don't think these words were not used by terrorists to recruit terrorists?
That's the point of using these words to influence actions...in this case the above traitors words "INFLUENCED" terrorists to recruit...just as the Harvard study said!

So you're saying American's rightwing is responsible for additional attacks by ISIS since they're vocally critical of the way Obama's running the war against them?
YOU f...king traitor!
NOT ONE person critical of Obama criticizes the troops and THAT's the difference!!!!
All the above QUOTES were calling our troops cold blooded killers, terrorists!
THERE HAVE NOT BEEN ONE critic of Obama and his bungling of ISIS that criticize the troops!

But of course being a lover of terrorists hater of our troops you can't comprehend that!
THAT is the big f...king distinction!
Obama fault was NOT listening to the generals who told him you CAN'T give the enemy a time frame when you pull out!
The enemy is laughing their heads off at the gross stupidity of Obama ... YOU NEVER NEVER tell the enemy when you plan to GIVE UP!@!
Huh? "all of the above quotes are calling our troops cold blooded killers and terrorists?"

"Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything ""​

Explain how that quote calls our troops "cold blooded killers" or "terrorists?"
 
Only a simple minded party hack would post that,The media and our not so honorable Dems most certainly made things worse,more live lost more destruction.One would have to openly lie or have head so far up ons ass to think otherwise.
Oh? How did their words cost lives and make things worse?

Did you read the Harvard study above?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.

But you idiots don't get it do you?
Why are you writing crap? What purpose does your writing words do?
Obviously you want to influence people's thinking why else are you are this forum?
So that be obvious...YOU use words to influence people to action!
These words influenced ACTIONS!!
Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

You accuse Bush of USING words to LIE to people! Bush's words influenced actions!
Well the above idiots KNOWING the power of their words went ahead and called our troops "terrorists".."civilian killers"..."Nazis"..."cold blooded killers"!
You don't think these words were not used by terrorists to recruit terrorists?
That's the point of using these words to influence actions...in this case the above traitors words "INFLUENCED" terrorists to recruit...just as the Harvard study said!

So you're saying American's rightwing is responsible for additional attacks by ISIS since they're vocally critical of the way Obama's running the war against them?
YOU f...king traitor!
NOT ONE person critical of Obama criticizes the troops and THAT's the difference!!!!
All the above QUOTES were calling our troops cold blooded killers, terrorists!
THERE HAVE NOT BEEN ONE critic of Obama and his bungling of ISIS that criticize the troops!

But of course being a lover of terrorists hater of our troops you can't comprehend that!
THAT is the big f...king distinction!
Obama fault was NOT listening to the generals who told him you CAN'T give the enemy a time frame when you pull out!
The enemy is laughing their heads off at the gross stupidity of Obama ... YOU NEVER NEVER tell the enemy when you plan to GIVE UP!@!
Huh? "all of the above quotes are calling our troops cold blooded killers and terrorists?"

"Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything ""​

Explain how that quote calls our troops "cold blooded killers" or "terrorists?"

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "
Pretty f...king obvious these traitors weren't HELPING our troops..calling them terrorists,killing civilians,etc..!
 
Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "
Pretty f...king obvious these traitors weren't HELPING our troops..calling them terrorists,killing civilians,etc..!
were thos quotes factually inaccurate? Reid's was, the surge did end up successful. But the rest? Are they untrue?
 
And they got screwed as a reward because the administration listened to guys like Rumsfeld and Cheney instead of the military leaders who knew what they were talking about.

stripes.com/news/3rd-id-troops-ordered-to-stay-in-iraq-1.6124

But hey, maybe stripes is a biased source.

Nobody got "screwed" except Baghdad Bob, asshole.....you don't know anything about it.

Thousands of American Soldiers got killed because of the FUBAR occupation.
Unknown number of civilians were killed because of the same.
American TaxPayers got screwed out of hundreds of billions.

Who was the decider in chief?

NO Question GWB takes full responsibility using the old fashion TRUST that Americans would NEVER bad mouth the troops!
GWB never thought a US Senator who became the C-I-C...would call our military for "air-raiding villages ,killing civilians"!
But when the traitor MSM/Democrats constantly berating our troops as Nazis, cold blooded killers, terrorists... GWB NEVER in his life heard such blatant help and
encouraging words to the enemy!
GWB was old fashioned enough to understand that when you bad mouth the home team... the other team LOVES that!
Only idiots like you continue to bash our military and consequently look what the moral of our troops stands!


According to a Military Times survey of almost 2,300 active-duty service members,
Obama’s popularity — never high to begin with — has crumbled,
falling from 35 percent in 2009 to just 15 percent this year, while his disapproval ratings have increased to 55 percent from 40 percent over that time.
Read more at New Poll Shows Just How Much The Military Dislikes Obama And The Results Are MIND BLOWING

Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
 
And they got screwed as a reward because the administration listened to guys like Rumsfeld and Cheney instead of the military leaders who knew what they were talking about.

stripes.com/news/3rd-id-troops-ordered-to-stay-in-iraq-1.6124

But hey, maybe stripes is a biased source.

Nobody got "screwed" except Baghdad Bob, asshole.....you don't know anything about it.

Thousands of American Soldiers got killed because of the FUBAR occupation.
Unknown number of civilians were killed because of the same.
American TaxPayers got screwed out of hundreds of billions.

Who was the decider in chief?

NO Question GWB takes full responsibility using the old fashion TRUST that Americans would NEVER bad mouth the troops!
GWB never thought a US Senator who became the C-I-C...would call our military for "air-raiding villages ,killing civilians"!
But when the traitor MSM/Democrats constantly berating our troops as Nazis, cold blooded killers, terrorists... GWB NEVER in his life heard such blatant help and
encouraging words to the enemy!
GWB was old fashioned enough to understand that when you bad mouth the home team... the other team LOVES that!
Only idiots like you continue to bash our military and consequently look what the moral of our troops stands!


According to a Military Times survey of almost 2,300 active-duty service members,
Obama’s popularity — never high to begin with — has crumbled,
falling from 35 percent in 2009 to just 15 percent this year, while his disapproval ratings have increased to 55 percent from 40 percent over that time.
Read more at New Poll Shows Just How Much The Military Dislikes Obama And The Results Are MIND BLOWING

Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..
 
And they got screwed as a reward because the administration listened to guys like Rumsfeld and Cheney instead of the military leaders who knew what they were talking about.

stripes.com/news/3rd-id-troops-ordered-to-stay-in-iraq-1.6124

But hey, maybe stripes is a biased source.

Nobody got "screwed" except Baghdad Bob, asshole.....you don't know anything about it.

Thousands of American Soldiers got killed because of the FUBAR occupation.
Unknown number of civilians were killed because of the same.
American TaxPayers got screwed out of hundreds of billions.

Who was the decider in chief?

NO Question GWB takes full responsibility using the old fashion TRUST that Americans would NEVER bad mouth the troops!
GWB never thought a US Senator who became the C-I-C...would call our military for "air-raiding villages ,killing civilians"!
But when the traitor MSM/Democrats constantly berating our troops as Nazis, cold blooded killers, terrorists... GWB NEVER in his life heard such blatant help and
encouraging words to the enemy!
GWB was old fashioned enough to understand that when you bad mouth the home team... the other team LOVES that!
Only idiots like you continue to bash our military and consequently look what the moral of our troops stands!


According to a Military Times survey of almost 2,300 active-duty service members,
Obama’s popularity — never high to begin with — has crumbled,
falling from 35 percent in 2009 to just 15 percent this year, while his disapproval ratings have increased to 55 percent from 40 percent over that time.
Read more at New Poll Shows Just How Much The Military Dislikes Obama And The Results Are MIND BLOWING

Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
 
Nobody got "screwed" except Baghdad Bob, asshole.....you don't know anything about it.

Thousands of American Soldiers got killed because of the FUBAR occupation.
Unknown number of civilians were killed because of the same.
American TaxPayers got screwed out of hundreds of billions.

Who was the decider in chief?

NO Question GWB takes full responsibility using the old fashion TRUST that Americans would NEVER bad mouth the troops!
GWB never thought a US Senator who became the C-I-C...would call our military for "air-raiding villages ,killing civilians"!
But when the traitor MSM/Democrats constantly berating our troops as Nazis, cold blooded killers, terrorists... GWB NEVER in his life heard such blatant help and
encouraging words to the enemy!
GWB was old fashioned enough to understand that when you bad mouth the home team... the other team LOVES that!
Only idiots like you continue to bash our military and consequently look what the moral of our troops stands!


According to a Military Times survey of almost 2,300 active-duty service members,
Obama’s popularity — never high to begin with — has crumbled,
falling from 35 percent in 2009 to just 15 percent this year, while his disapproval ratings have increased to 55 percent from 40 percent over that time.
Read more at New Poll Shows Just How Much The Military Dislikes Obama And The Results Are MIND BLOWING

Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.
 
Thousands of American Soldiers got killed because of the FUBAR occupation.
Unknown number of civilians were killed because of the same.
American TaxPayers got screwed out of hundreds of billions.

Who was the decider in chief?

NO Question GWB takes full responsibility using the old fashion TRUST that Americans would NEVER bad mouth the troops!
GWB never thought a US Senator who became the C-I-C...would call our military for "air-raiding villages ,killing civilians"!
But when the traitor MSM/Democrats constantly berating our troops as Nazis, cold blooded killers, terrorists... GWB NEVER in his life heard such blatant help and
encouraging words to the enemy!
GWB was old fashioned enough to understand that when you bad mouth the home team... the other team LOVES that!
Only idiots like you continue to bash our military and consequently look what the moral of our troops stands!


According to a Military Times survey of almost 2,300 active-duty service members,
Obama’s popularity — never high to begin with — has crumbled,
falling from 35 percent in 2009 to just 15 percent this year, while his disapproval ratings have increased to 55 percent from 40 percent over that time.
Read more at New Poll Shows Just How Much The Military Dislikes Obama And The Results Are MIND BLOWING

Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.
 
NO Question GWB takes full responsibility using the old fashion TRUST that Americans would NEVER bad mouth the troops!
GWB never thought a US Senator who became the C-I-C...would call our military for "air-raiding villages ,killing civilians"!
But when the traitor MSM/Democrats constantly berating our troops as Nazis, cold blooded killers, terrorists... GWB NEVER in his life heard such blatant help and
encouraging words to the enemy!
GWB was old fashioned enough to understand that when you bad mouth the home team... the other team LOVES that!
Only idiots like you continue to bash our military and consequently look what the moral of our troops stands!


According to a Military Times survey of almost 2,300 active-duty service members,
Obama’s popularity — never high to begin with — has crumbled,
falling from 35 percent in 2009 to just 15 percent this year, while his disapproval ratings have increased to 55 percent from 40 percent over that time.
Read more at New Poll Shows Just How Much The Military Dislikes Obama And The Results Are MIND BLOWING

Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.

You are RIGHT!
But you don't stand on the home team sidelines and cheer for the other side!
You don't attack the team that is following orders!
You don't tell the other side.."Hey our guys are killers! "Our guys kill and terrorize children!" And tell me that these words don't have a POSITIVE affect on the terrorists that recruited more terrorists AND at the same time demoralizes our troops when these elected Senators/Congressmen say:

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "
 
Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.

You are RIGHT!
But you don't stand on the home team sidelines and cheer for the other side!
You don't attack the team that is following orders!
You don't tell the other side.."Hey our guys are killers! "Our guys kill and terrorize children!" And tell me that these words don't have a POSITIVE affect on the terrorists that recruited more terrorists AND at the same time demoralizes our troops when these elected Senators/Congressmen say:

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

The citizens of Afghanistan and Iraq did not need or depend on elected American government officials to inform them of crimes and atrocities being committed by American troops. They were already using incidents like these as recruitment propaganda and vengeance attacks were already being made on troops not connected in any way with the poor discipline, faulty tactics or outright criminal behavior by others. It sounds like some would like to ignore facts and responsibilities and suspend free speech for the sake of being able to commit war crimes and atrocities. The incidents exposed to the American public were addressed and the country is better for it. Not a single incident being listed in this thread was shown to be untrue. Many more far more ugly incidents were also addressed.
 
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.

You are RIGHT!
But you don't stand on the home team sidelines and cheer for the other side!
You don't attack the team that is following orders!
You don't tell the other side.."Hey our guys are killers! "Our guys kill and terrorize children!" And tell me that these words don't have a POSITIVE affect on the terrorists that recruited more terrorists AND at the same time demoralizes our troops when these elected Senators/Congressmen say:

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

The citizens of Afghanistan and Iraq did not need or depend on elected American government officials to inform them of crimes and atrocities being committed by American troops. They were already using incidents like these as recruitment propaganda and vengeance attacks were already being made on troops not connected in any way with the poor discipline, faulty tactics or outright criminal behavior by others. It sounds like some would like to ignore facts and responsibilities and suspend free speech for the sake of being able to commit war crimes and atrocities. The incidents exposed to the American public were addressed and the country is better for it. Not a single incident being listed in this thread was shown to be untrue. Many more far more ugly incidents were also addressed.

Yea well before Vietnam/Iraq the following statements would be called "treason"..especially during WWII and Korean!


Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "[/QUOTE]
There was a GOP senator that helped Harry Truman who was being criticized by GOP that said.."
“Even our party divisions, acrimonious as they are, cease at the water’s edge. They are lost in attachment to the national character, on the element where that character is made respectable. In protecting naval interests by naval means, you will arm yourselves with the whole power of national sentiment, and may command the whole abundance of the national resources.”
The Big Apple 8220 Politics stops at the water 8217 s edge 8221
 
Thousands of American Soldiers got killed because of the FUBAR occupation.
Unknown number of civilians were killed because of the same.
American TaxPayers got screwed out of hundreds of billions.

Who was the decider in chief?

NO Question GWB takes full responsibility using the old fashion TRUST that Americans would NEVER bad mouth the troops!
GWB never thought a US Senator who became the C-I-C...would call our military for "air-raiding villages ,killing civilians"!
But when the traitor MSM/Democrats constantly berating our troops as Nazis, cold blooded killers, terrorists... GWB NEVER in his life heard such blatant help and
encouraging words to the enemy!
GWB was old fashioned enough to understand that when you bad mouth the home team... the other team LOVES that!
Only idiots like you continue to bash our military and consequently look what the moral of our troops stands!


According to a Military Times survey of almost 2,300 active-duty service members,
Obama’s popularity — never high to begin with — has crumbled,
falling from 35 percent in 2009 to just 15 percent this year, while his disapproval ratings have increased to 55 percent from 40 percent over that time.
Read more at New Poll Shows Just How Much The Military Dislikes Obama And The Results Are MIND BLOWING

Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

All that cost lives was Bush invading in the first place.
 
The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.

You are RIGHT!
But you don't stand on the home team sidelines and cheer for the other side!
You don't attack the team that is following orders!
You don't tell the other side.."Hey our guys are killers! "Our guys kill and terrorize children!" And tell me that these words don't have a POSITIVE affect on the terrorists that recruited more terrorists AND at the same time demoralizes our troops when these elected Senators/Congressmen say:

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

The citizens of Afghanistan and Iraq did not need or depend on elected American government officials to inform them of crimes and atrocities being committed by American troops. They were already using incidents like these as recruitment propaganda and vengeance attacks were already being made on troops not connected in any way with the poor discipline, faulty tactics or outright criminal behavior by others. It sounds like some would like to ignore facts and responsibilities and suspend free speech for the sake of being able to commit war crimes and atrocities. The incidents exposed to the American public were addressed and the country is better for it. Not a single incident being listed in this thread was shown to be untrue. Many more far more ugly incidents were also addressed.

Yea well before Vietnam/Iraq the following statements would be called "treason"..especially during WWII and Korean!


Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Why do you want to review these embarrassing incidents? Only a brainwashed idiot would not know that US troops are currently serving sentences in military prisons for committing the crimes referred to. Only an uninformed idiot would not know that night time raids into home with children were being used as a tactic by US troops and that air raids were causing significant and unacceptable collateral damage. Commanders were put on notice and troops were better educated in regards to the tolerance of criminal behavior against citizens. Night time house raids were greatly reduced as a routine tactic. Collateral damage by air raids were reduced. So again, why do you want to bring this subject up for discussion?
 
NO Question GWB takes full responsibility using the old fashion TRUST that Americans would NEVER bad mouth the troops!
GWB never thought a US Senator who became the C-I-C...would call our military for "air-raiding villages ,killing civilians"!
But when the traitor MSM/Democrats constantly berating our troops as Nazis, cold blooded killers, terrorists... GWB NEVER in his life heard such blatant help and
encouraging words to the enemy!
GWB was old fashioned enough to understand that when you bad mouth the home team... the other team LOVES that!
Only idiots like you continue to bash our military and consequently look what the moral of our troops stands!


According to a Military Times survey of almost 2,300 active-duty service members,
Obama’s popularity — never high to begin with — has crumbled,
falling from 35 percent in 2009 to just 15 percent this year, while his disapproval ratings have increased to 55 percent from 40 percent over that time.
Read more at New Poll Shows Just How Much The Military Dislikes Obama And The Results Are MIND BLOWING

Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

All that cost lives was Bush invading in the first place.
Which everyone of those shit heads voted to do,do you have any integrity at all?
 
Actually he was calling out the Decider for switching focus and resources to Iraq as well as authorizing the bombings that caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But I'm sure our enemies love the way you mis-characterize his words to mean something other than what was said.
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.

You are RIGHT!
But you don't stand on the home team sidelines and cheer for the other side!
You don't attack the team that is following orders!
You don't tell the other side.."Hey our guys are killers! "Our guys kill and terrorize children!" And tell me that these words don't have a POSITIVE affect on the terrorists that recruited more terrorists AND at the same time demoralizes our troops when these elected Senators/Congressmen say:

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

By using those incomplete statements out of context, as always, you are aiding the enemy.
 

Why do you want to review these embarrassing incidents? Only a brainwashed idiot would not know that US troops are currently serving sentences in military prisons for committing the crimes referred to. Only an uninformed idiot would not know that night time raids into home with children were being used as a tactic by US troops and that air raids were causing significant and unacceptable collateral damage. Commanders were put on notice and troops were better educated in regards to the tolerance of criminal behavior against citizens. Night time house raids were greatly reduced as a routine tactic. Collateral damage by air raids were reduced. So again, why do you want to bring this subject up for discussion?

Hey shit bag.....tell us how you know what you're saying? You don't have a clue about combat...you don't know shit about the ROEs your queer-ass president demanded and how we've suffered a disgusting increase in casualties from them. You run your mouth without knowing anything but what you read from other ugly leftist weaklings who don't know a hand grenade from a hand job. You think you're some kind of authority on "collateral damage" do ya boy? Well let me tell you this...anybody who feeds, shelters, or hides weapons for the enemy IS the enemy.....these cowards hide amongst children, in their mosques, thinking we're too "civil" to go after them there.....well, that's a recipe for losing a war, which is what you want in the first place. Your kind makes real Americans sick to their stomachs.
 
Or the way people like yourself,would rather make a political hay at the expense of military personnel and civilians. The way Dems were for it until they were against it,because they hope to get more votes,lost all credibility Ignoring those facts just make one another simple hack that care for nothing but what they can get..

The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.

You are RIGHT!
But you don't stand on the home team sidelines and cheer for the other side!
You don't attack the team that is following orders!
You don't tell the other side.."Hey our guys are killers! "Our guys kill and terrorize children!" And tell me that these words don't have a POSITIVE affect on the terrorists that recruited more terrorists AND at the same time demoralizes our troops when these elected Senators/Congressmen say:

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

By using those incomplete statements out of context, as always, you are aiding the enemy.
He is wrapping himself in the flag and claiming American innocence and the purity of American troops knowing that to challenge him requires challenging that innocence and purity he is attempting to portray. His mission is to create a text of his opponents attempting to disparage American troops. He is a POS that is attempting to create a false impression of reality at the expense of our veterans and national honor. His own warped and distorted opinions are more important to him than anything else.
 
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.

You are RIGHT!
But you don't stand on the home team sidelines and cheer for the other side!
You don't attack the team that is following orders!
You don't tell the other side.."Hey our guys are killers! "Our guys kill and terrorize children!" And tell me that these words don't have a POSITIVE affect on the terrorists that recruited more terrorists AND at the same time demoralizes our troops when these elected Senators/Congressmen say:

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

The citizens of Afghanistan and Iraq did not need or depend on elected American government officials to inform them of crimes and atrocities being committed by American troops. They were already using incidents like these as recruitment propaganda and vengeance attacks were already being made on troops not connected in any way with the poor discipline, faulty tactics or outright criminal behavior by others. It sounds like some would like to ignore facts and responsibilities and suspend free speech for the sake of being able to commit war crimes and atrocities. The incidents exposed to the American public were addressed and the country is better for it. Not a single incident being listed in this thread was shown to be untrue. Many more far more ugly incidents were also addressed.

Yea well before Vietnam/Iraq the following statements would be called "treason"..especially during WWII and Korean!


Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Why do you want to review these embarrassing incidents? Only a brainwashed idiot would not know that US troops are currently serving sentences in military prisons for committing the crimes referred to. Only an uninformed idiot would not know that night time raids into home with children were being used as a tactic by US troops and that air raids were causing significant and unacceptable collateral damage. Commanders were put on notice and troops were better educated in regards to the tolerance of criminal behavior against citizens. Night time house raids were greatly reduced as a routine tactic. Collateral damage by air raids were reduced. So again, why do you want to bring this subject up for discussion?

Simply because THESE TRAITORS had more secure, less publicized VENUES to make these observations rather then blasting them out in the MSM to be used as propaganda that KILLED US troops and thousands of Iraqis!
NO one should DISAGREE that the vast Majority of all our military are NOT NAZIS! ARE NOT COLD BLOODED KILLeRS!
So why then would idiot traitors like the above comments be made in the press KNOWING full well they MAYBE taken out of context by the terrorists?
Either the above are so f...king DUMB not to know the power of words OR THEY TRULY didn't CARE!
They wanted their political agenda to be moved REGARDLESS of how many troops were killed or innocent Iraqis slaughter BY the TERRORISTS!
THERE is NO NONE NADA... justifications for comments like these!
Ask ANY Military person if being called "cold blooded killers" or "terrorists" or "Nazis" or the "war is lost" is HELPFUL to THEM or to the bad guys!
Why are people like you so ready to believe as the above traitors did that ALL our military are the bad guys?

The Haditha incident (also called the Haditha killings or the Haditha massacre) refers to the incident in which 24 unarmed Iraqi men, women and children, all civilians,[1][2] were killed by a group of United States Marines on November 19, 2005 in Haditha, a city in the westernIraqi province of Al Anbar. The dead included several children and elderly people, who were shot multiple times at close range while unarmed. It has been alleged that the killings were retribution for the attack on a convoy of Marines with an improvised explosive device that killed Lance Corporal Miguel Terrazas. Many news reports have compared the incident to the My Lai massacre.[3]
By June 17, 2008, six defendants had had their cases dropped and a seventh found not guilty.[11] The exception was former Staff Sgt Frank Wuterich. On October 3, 2007, the Article 32 hearing investigating officer recommended that Wuterich be tried for negligent homicide in the deaths of two women and five children, and that charges of murder be dropped.Haditha killings - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
But here was Murtha BEFORE knowing the FACTS...U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,"
Did MURTHA ever retract this statement that the context is ALL OUR TROOPS KILLED INNOCENT CIVILIANS IN COLD BLOOD"?
When Murtha said...
"There was no firefight, there was no IED (improvised explosive device) that killed these innocent people. Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them, and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood."[73]

On August 2, 2006, Marine Corps Staff Sergeant Frank D. Wuterich, who led the accused squad, filed suit for libel and invasion of privacy. The filing stated Murtha "tarnished the Marine's reputation by telling news organizations in May that the Marine unit cracked after a roadside bomb killed one of its members and that the troops 'killed innocent civilians in cold blood.' Murtha also said repeatedly that the incident was 'covered up.' "[74] As of June 2008, Wuterich was charged with nine counts of manslaughter. Wuterich's lawsuit against Murtha was dismissed in 2009, as the court determined Murtha was immune, having made his comments as a lawmaker

On September 25, 2008 former Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt, one of the Marines exonerated in the hearings, filed a slander suit against Rep. Murtha. The lawsuit states that "Sharratt, in being labeled repeatedly by Murtha as a 'cold-blooded murderer,' and by Murtha outrageously claiming that the Haditha incident was comparable to the infamous (My Lai) massacre of Vietnam, has suffered permanent, irreversible damage to his reputation." In 2011, Sharratt's lawsuit was dismissed by the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
.Haditha killings - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
The terrible decisions made by the Bush administration to the shift focus to Iraq instead of focusing on the people who attacked us, and during the occupation of Iraq, is not an assault on the military.
The bull shit double dance shit stains like Ried/Kerry did,cost lives saying otherwise is ignorance.

Neither Reid nor Kerry had the authority to invade and occupy Iraq. That's what cost lives then and now. It is all on President Bush.

You are RIGHT!
But you don't stand on the home team sidelines and cheer for the other side!
You don't attack the team that is following orders!
You don't tell the other side.."Hey our guys are killers! "Our guys kill and terrorize children!" And tell me that these words don't have a POSITIVE affect on the terrorists that recruited more terrorists AND at the same time demoralizes our troops when these elected Senators/Congressmen say:

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Remember Kerry EARLIER SAID...
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an
oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

By using those incomplete statements out of context, as always, you are aiding the enemy.
He is wrapping himself in the flag and claiming American innocence and the purity of American troops knowing that to challenge him requires challenging that innocence and purity he is attempting to portray. His mission is to create a text of his opponents attempting to disparage American troops. He is a POS that is attempting to create a false impression of reality at the expense of our veterans and national honor. His own warped and distorted opinions are more important to him than anything else.

So let me get this... All US Soldiers are heros by default. If they complain about other soldiers they are traitors.

Women soldiers are 15 times more likely to be raped by a comrade then killed by an enemy. But the soldiers that rape them are heroes.
Glad to see women are doing their effort for the war front.
The Pentagon estimated that 26,000 service members experienced unwanted sexual contact in 2012, up from 19,000 in 2010. Of those cases, the Pentagon says, most involved attacks on men, mostly by other men. Out of 1,197,000 total enlisted men, approximately 1 to 2 percent are said to have experienced a sexual assault.

So sometimes out on the battlefield you haven't raped a fellow solider in a while, why shouldn't the locals provide. You are in there country giving them freedom after all.

And remember everyone, they are all heroes, except the ones that complain about being raped, do you that affects moral.
 

Forum List

Back
Top