Sandra Fluke to run for Congress

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2013
49,472
28,159
2,605
Oregon
:piss2:

Finally getting rid of Henry Nostrilitus, and looks like we'll get an even bigger handout lover.

Sandra Fluke to run for Henry Waxman's congressional seat


Sandra Fluke*is joining the long list of California Democrats running for*Rep. Henry Waxman's soon-to-be vacated Congressional seat.Fluke, the birth control advocate who Rush Limbaugh called a "slut" on his radio show in February 2012, has*filed the necessary paperwork to seek an endorsement from the California Democratic Party*for a run.The 32-year-old lawyer had said earlier in January that she was "strongly considering" making a bid for Waxman's seat, adding she was "flattered" that she was being discussed as a potential candidate.RELATED: CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC REP. HENRY WAXMAN TO RETIREFluke gained national attention for her testimony before Congress in 2012, when she advocated for health insurers to pay for contraception as part of the Affordable Care Act.Read more:*Sandra Fluke to run for Henry Waxman's congressional seat - NY Daily News

Sandra Fluke to run for Henry Waxman's congressional seat - NY Daily News
 
and you will likely cheat in that election to keep her from winning huh
 
The whore can't afford $9 a Month for Birth Control Pills (which I would gladly provide her as service to all humankind)

But she manages to scrape up enough money for a run at Congress?

What a crock of shit dimocraps will buy into.

51ipKubUX6L._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA278_PIkin4,BottomRight,-64,22_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg
 
How does she have time to run for anything but the next sexual encounter? Who will she screw to get this position?
 
How does she have time to run for anything but the next sexual encounter? Who will she screw to get this position?

Same person she's been screwing all along.... Adam Mutterperl. The son of a VERY powerful, VERY RICH, and very influential Wall Street type.

The Mutterperl family is well-known in New Yawk and New England. An old family steeped in the tradition of wealthy, but socialist, Jews of the last 100+ years.

Nothing against Jews, but they have their own variety of socialist traditions in the Northeast.

It's complicated. And sort of ugly.

But anyway, her appearance on the sham committee hosted by the equally ugly and nasty Nazi Pelousy was completely set up by her soon-to-be Daddy-In-Law.

Believe it.

dimocraps will vote in lock step for her, goose-stepping the whole way
 
These women wanting sex all the time disgust me. It's the end of christian civilization. The only thing holding this society together is holding the stigma of an unwanted pregnancy and poverty over their heads. Deny God and PeRISH! (-:
 
Fluke will be flushed out during the primary.

Think so? She has the celebrity appeal that seems to work so well in California. And her one speech qualifications seem on par with Obama. She seems a shoe in for the nomination.
 
I dunno. I mean she took a stand on female health care, and ended up with a job at some think tank kinda place. She's a law grad. I'm no fan of obamacare, but Waxman represented a liberal view of healthcare, so she seems to have as much qualifications for that as .... Herman Cain or Ted Yost down Fla way.

I don't totally agree with her politics, but she seems a decent human being.
 
How many times will El Rushbo call her a slut and/or a whore this time around?

oh but that was all a joke and not really evidence of the right hating women at all.

Yes a joke just like all the attacks on conservative women from the left are jokes and not proof of the lefts hatred and hypocrisy with the whole war on women talking point.
 
I dunno. I mean she took a stand on female health care, and ended up with a job at some think tank kinda place. She's a law grad. I'm no fan of obamacare, but Waxman represented a liberal view of healthcare, so she seems to have as much qualifications for that as .... Herman Cain or Ted Yost down Fla way.

I don't totally agree with her politics, but she seems a decent human being.

Someone who thinks the government should dictate what benefits an employer should be forced to provide to their employees, other than cash for services rendered, is not a decent human being. They are a totalitarian.

Employment should be a simple proposition. You get paid cash for work, then you can spend it on booze or birth control pills or food or whatever the hell YOU think is best for you. You shouldn't even be getting employer-sponsored insurance. It is one of the leading causes of the cost curve bending up and the biggest individual tax expenditure boondoggle out there.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top