AllieBaba
Rookie
- Oct 2, 2007
- 33,778
- 3,927
- 0
- Banned
- #121
While I appreciate how well you have spelled out your problems with Palin (and understand, I am not thrilled about the choice)...I think you are making the dangerous mistake of underestimating your opponent if you think that McCain chose Palin simply to pull Hillary voters away from Obama.
This doesn't make sense for a number of reasons...reasons that McCain and his people had to have known before they made their choice. To name a few:
1) Palin is a nobody politically-speaking. To assume that women who supported such a well-known person as Hillary are simply going to turn over and vote McCain because he nominated someone with breasts is stupid. Republicans may think Democrats are dumb, but not that dumb.
2) Palin, as far as I know, is ardently Pro-Life. Many female Democrats consider a woman's right to choose to be a non-debatable, deal-breaking issue. If a candidate is not pro-choice, they will not vote for them. In a sense, this choice by McCain may have actually COST him Hillary cross-over votes...instead of won them.
3) Palin, being inexperienced and unknown, comes across as a pandering choice. I have already spoken to two of my liberal friends who stated that McCain only chose her so that he could have a woman on his ticket - one thought it was because he was trying to combat the desire to vote for "the first" of something, either the first black president, or the first woman vp. The other thought it was to win women who wanted to vote for Hillary. Either way, many women feel that this choice was actually insulting because they feel it implies that McCain feels they will vote for him simply because he has a woman on his ticket. Not necessarily the way to win an election.
And say what you will about McCain...up to now, he hasn't been outright stupid in any of his decisions...so one has to ask...
If he didn't choose Palin to win Hillary voters (which I really don't think he did for the reasons I've illustrated above)...
Why did he choose her?
Has anybody bothered to look to see where Alaska is located? Have you forgotten how central that area is to the issue of energy, oil, and industry?
It shares the border with Canada, and Russia is just a few miles away. Palin is extraordinarily more experienced in actuality than Hillary OR Obama...whose only claims to fame are that Hillary is the wife of a past president, and a junior senator; and Obama is even less qualified, as he is only a junior senator.
This woman speaks to the issues and has been shown to act on them. If you think a SENATOR is more of a qualification to the presidency than a governor, you are sadly ignorant of the job description of senators and governors.
She won by a landslide over an incumbent governor in Alaska, she has come up with and successfully put into place finance reform, and has experience dealing with international issues, as governor of Alaska.
I can't believe that of all the things to attack her on, the libs are attacking her as a "token" (you guys really are the bigots, that's pretty obvious) and "lack of experience" which are the two things she certainly isn't. Attack her on the issues, for Pete's sakes. Look at what she's done and criticize that...but when you pretend she hasn't had any "experience" you just make yourselves look foolish; particularly given the fact that your presidential nominee actually has zero "experience" and has no achievements whatsoever under his belt.