Schiff faces mounting GOP calls for resignation over collusion claims

[busybee01]

Trump has longstanding financial ties to Russia. You have no problem with that yet you accuse Clinton of the same thing

What a desperate f*ing pathetic snow flake you are. Trump is an international businessman who has not been exposed as being a proven, protected criminal.

I certainly do not accuse Clinton of 'doing the same thing' as she paid foreign spies and Russians for their help in 2016.

\

You are the f*ing desperate, pathetic snowflake. Trump is someone who relied heavily on Russian financing and the Russians made sure Trump was happy.

— Donald Trump has a long history of not honoring contracts with construction companies
— Donald Trump has knowingly and intentionally defrauded Trump University students, fleecing them out of thousands of dollars
— He may have illegally coordinated with his SuperPac
— He illegally used corporate resources to pay an employee to write a political speech
— He violated federal law by claiming proceeds from various Trump products would go to charity, although there is no evidence that Trump ever donated the money to charity
— He violated IRS rules by using $12,000 from his charity organization to purchase a Tim Tebow helmet
— He violated election laws by emailing foreign officials to solicit political contributions
— He violated federal laws by offering Ben Carson a job in exchange for his endorsement
— His employees violated a U.S. trade embargo by pursuing commercial activities in Cuba when it was illegal to do so
— He’s run afoul of election laws by using campaign contributions to pay $6 million to his own businesses
— He violated Wisconsin election laws by talking with voters as they stood in line to vote
— He violated New York state education laws for operating a for-profit investment school without the required license
— His foreign policy proposals would violate NATO
— He’s violated copyright law for using copyrighted images without permission
— Trump broke New York state law by lobbying to prevent an Indian casino from opening in the Catskills.
— He broke anti-discrimination laws to keep a mob boss gambling at one of his casinos
— He violated immigration laws by misrepresenting his company on work-visa applications

It's Definitely Hillary Clinton Who Thinks She Is 'Above the Law'

 

[Dragonlady]

You know a snowflake has run out of lies when they just keep repeating the same lie told by an admitted classified data leaker instead of acknowledging the fact spelled out in the long-awaited Mueller report.

So YOU'VE actually seen the Mueller Report and you know for a fact what's in it? How did you manage that?

Or are you just going by what Barr says is in it?

 

[easyt65]

Trump has longstanding financial ties to Russia. You have no problem with that yet you accuse Clinton of the same thing

What a desperate f*ing pathetic snow flake you are. Trump is an international businessman who has not been exposed as being a proven, protected criminal.

I certainly do not accuse Clinton of 'doing the same thing' as she paid foreign spies and Russians for their help in 2016.

\

You are the f*ing desperate, pathetic snowflake. Trump is someone who relied heavily on Russian financing and the Russians made sure Trump was happy.

— Donald Trump has a long history of not honoring contracts with construction companies
— Donald Trump has knowingly and intentionally defrauded Trump University students, fleecing them out of thousands of dollars
— He may have illegally coordinated with his SuperPac
— He illegally used corporate resources to pay an employee to write a political speech
— He violated federal law by claiming proceeds from various Trump products would go to charity, although there is no evidence that Trump ever donated the money to charity
— He violated IRS rules by using $12,000 from his charity organization to purchase a Tim Tebow helmet
— He violated election laws by emailing foreign officials to solicit political contributions
— He violated federal laws by offering Ben Carson a job in exchange for his endorsement
— His employees violated a U.S. trade embargo by pursuing commercial activities in Cuba when it was illegal to do so
— He’s run afoul of election laws by using campaign contributions to pay $6 million to his own businesses
— He violated Wisconsin election laws by talking with voters as they stood in line to vote
— He violated New York state education laws for operating a for-profit investment school without the required license
— His foreign policy proposals would violate NATO
— He’s violated copyright law for using copyrighted images without permission
— Trump broke New York state law by lobbying to prevent an Indian casino from opening in the Catskills.
— He broke anti-discrimination laws to keep a mob boss gambling at one of his casinos
— He violated immigration laws by misrepresenting his company on work-visa applications

It's Definitely Hillary Clinton Who Thinks She Is 'Above the Law'

No one gives a sh!t about your personal reality-denying, fact-ignoring, hate-driven, Trump-hating partisan rant, snowflake!


Post the link to the evidence that 1 single Mueller indictment / conviction was for Russian collusion, snowflake, or STFU!

 

[easyt65]

So YOU'VE actually seen the Mueller Report and you know for a fact what's in it? How did you manage that?

You have seen the Mueller quote stating no collusion was established, too.

It's what you snowflakes have been clinging to and spinning to claim he was ' not exonerated'.



No, it proves Mueller failed to prove Trump is guilty of the false allegations made against him.

'Innocent until proven guilty'. Mueller FAILED to prove Trump guilty of the accusations butt-hurt loser Democrats and snowflakes have made for 3 years now.

Time to put your big girl panties on and move on, snowflake.

 

[easyt65]

So YOU'VE actually seen the Mueller Report and you know for a fact what's in it? How did you manage that?

Or are you just going by what Barr says is in it?

Mueller did not indict / convict q person associated with Trump for Russian collusion

... But snowflakes want us to take THEIR word for it that it happened.

BWUHAHAHAHAHA!

 

[hadit]

“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”

Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone

All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK

Man, if only Mueller had asked you guys first. He could have saved so much time and money.

 

[hadit]

“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”

“You might think it’s OK that the president’s son-in-law sought to establish a secret back channel of communication with Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility,” he added. “I don’t think that’s OK. You might think it’s OK that an associate of the president made direct contact with the GRU through Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks. You might think it’s OK that a senior campaign official was instructed to reach that associate and find out what that hostile intelligence agency had to say, in terms of dirt on his opponent. You might think it’s OK that the national security adviser-designate secretly conferred with a Russian ambassador about undermining U.S. sanctions, and you might think it’s OK he lied about it to the FBI. You might say that’s all OK, that that’s just what you need to do to win. But I don’t think it’s OK. I think it’s immoral, I think it’s unethical, I think it’s unpatriotic and, yes, I think it’s corrupt, and evidence of collusion.”

Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone

All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK

So why did Mueller waste all that time and money when he could have just asked you?

 

[Lesh]

“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”

Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone

All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK

With all that in the public record...we really need to see what's in the 400 pages of the Mueller report

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”

Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone

All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK

With all that in the public record...we really need to see what's in the 400 pages of the Mueller report

You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better.

The entire country thinks that.
Wooden stake, silver bullet, burn the witch...….still can't get rid of her.
Thank God for the electoral college. The Clinton crime family is dead.
She can drown in vodka....no worry about that 3 am phone call now.

 

[hadit]

“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”

Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone

All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK

With all that in the public record...we really need to see what's in the 400 pages of the Mueller report

You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better.

The entire country thinks that.
Wooden stake, silver bullet, burn the witch...….still can't get rid of her.
Thank God for the electoral college. The Clinton crime family is dead.
She can drown in vodka....no worry about that 3 am phone call now.

It sounds like they're disappointed that the Russians didn't have a lot of dirt on her. You'd think that would be a good thing.

 

[basquebromance]

Pencil Neck Schiff was in Washington before Trump. he'll be in Washington after Trump

 

[Markle]

Pencil Neck Schiff was in Washington before Trump. he'll be in Washington after Trump

You're point being?

 

[Zorro!]

He should undergo an Ethics Investigation and then Expulsion from The House.
He then need prosecuted for leaking classified information.

Schiff and Nunes BOTH should get put in the back seat. Quit dreaming of putting your opposition in jail. That is so third world cheap.

And yet, that is EXACTLY what YOUR progressive democraps were trying to do. Face it, obummer took us further down the road to third world shitholedom, than any president before him.

I don't see it that way, but I was talking about Schiff and Nunes, not Obama.

The Steele Dossier = 100% HORSECRAP:

MSNBC PANEL ADMITS MUELLER REPORT ‘UNDERCUTS ALMOST EVERYTHING’ IN STEELE DOSSIER

"The two journalists most closely linked to the Steele dossier acknowledged Monday that the Democrat-funded document was debunked by the Mueller investigation, which found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.

“I think one of the reasons people were so surprised by the Mueller finding is that it undercuts almost everything that was in the dossier, which postulated a well-developed conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump campaign,” Michael Isikoff, a reporter for Yahoo! News, told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes. (RELATED: 7 Collusion Theories That Died With The Mueller Report)

“That’s what got people worked up initially, and we do have to acknowledge that that which was alleged has not panned out.”

Isikoff was joined by David Corn, a reporter at Mother Jones. Isikoff and Corn, who co-wrote the book “Russian Roulette,” are two of a small handful of reporters who met with dossier author Christopher Steele prior to the 2016 election.

They both wrote articles for their respective outlets touting Steele’s allegations that Trump associates conspired with Russians to influence the election.

Steele, who was working for the Clinton campaign and DNC, claimed that Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was the Trump campaign’s main liaison to the Kremlin. He also alleged that Michael Cohen, the former Trump lawyer, visited Prague in August 2016 to meet with Kremlin officials to discuss paying off hackers.

Those allegations were dismantled on Sunday, when Barr released a summary of Mueller’s report of the Russia probe. Mueller, according to Barr, found no evidence that Trump, members of his campaign, or other Americans conspired with Russia. (RELATED: Mueller Found No Collusion)

Isikoff noted that MSNBC anchors and guests frequently endorsed allegations from the dossier in the two years since BuzzFeed News published the salacious report.

“You know, it was endorsed on multiple, multiple times on this network, people saying it’s more and more proving to be true, and it wasn’t,” said Isikoff.

Hayes also embraced the view that Mueller’s report settled the dossier debate once and for all. Corn reluctantly conceded that Mueller’s report “pretty definitively” settled the question."

MSNBC Panel Admits Mueller Report ‘Undercuts Almost Everything’ In Steele Dossier

David Corn’s dossier debacle

It was the document that set off the whole shebang. In October 2016, days before the election, David Corn of Mother Jones wrote of an unnamed “former senior intelligence officer for a Western country,” Christopher Steele (unnamed at the time), who claimed that the Russians had dirt on Trump they could use to blackmail him. Thus were born the infamous “Steele dossier” and endless late-night jokes about a Trump “pee-pee” tape. But the Mueller report barely touches on the dossier — and confirms none of its outlandish claims.