Science rejects fix for global warming.

There's no need to "fix" a "problem" that doesn't exist.
The irony is that much of our economy depends on the continuing existence of problems. Addressing climate change could be a huge source of economic growth, far beyond windmills and solar panels.
 
There is only one "solution" to climate change.


Off everyone lying about Co2.

Climate problem SOLVED.
 
The irony is that much of our economy depends on the continuing existence of problems. Addressing climate change could be a huge source of economic growth, far beyond windmills and solar panels.


No, it would be a catastrophe for mankind.

There IS no climate change problem.

It is a fraud perpetrated on the people of this planet.
 
No, it would be a catastrophe for mankind.

There IS no climate change problem.

It is a fraud perpetrated on the people of this planet.
What's one more fraud more or less and think of the jobs it is creating.
 
No, it would be a catastrophe for mankind.

There IS no climate change problem.

It is a fraud perpetrated on the people of this planet.



There is a HUGE "climate change" problem.

We are paying $20 trillion to be lied to.

Solution = stop funding the liars, off them, and take everything they have and put it back in the US Treasury
 
What's one more fraud more or less and think of the jobs it is creating.


It is costing jobs, and lives. But so long as it's brown people you don't care that they are dying.
 
That's a different subject.
Is it though really? You are making a moral argument for reduced carbon emissions when in reality the true moral argument is people living in poverty because they don't have machinery that runs on fossil fuels. We should be using more fossil fuels, not less.

The planet cooled for millions of years with CO2 levels greater than 600 ppm. Don't try to tell me the world is going to end because CO2 is at 420 ppm.

1673744930146.png
 
Is it though really? You are making a moral argument for reduced carbon emissions when in reality the true moral argument is people living in poverty because they don't have machinery that runs on fossil fuels. We should be using more fossil fuels, not less.

The planet cooled for millions of years with CO2 levels greater than 600 ppm. Don't try to tell me the world is going to end because CO2 is at 420 ppm.

View attachment 756892
I'm making an economic argument.
 
"Science" rejects...

What is this personified "Science", some name for a new political party or something??
 

Forum List

Back
Top