munkle
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2012
- 4,705
- 7,831
Nuff said.
Scientific Doctrine Holds That Causality Must Be Assumed if Healthy People “Die Suddenly” After the COVID Vaccines. Follow the Science.
Scientific Doctrine Holds That Causality Must Be Assumed if Healthy People “Die Suddenly” After the COVID Vaccines. Follow the Science.
"The Bradford Hill Criteria were established in 1965 by the English epidemiologist Sir Austin Bradford Hill, to provide epidemiologic evidence of a causal relationship between a presumed cause and an observed effect. The criteria merely breaks down, elegantly, a thought process for determining if Event A causes Event B following it. Does it happen a lot? Are there any other good explanations for Event B? Is Event A something new? Is there is a plausible mechanism for what is taking place?
In the case of death and debilitation following the COVID vaccines, Dr. Peter McCullough and other doctors and scientists argue, the answers are all yes.
But others argue that this makes very complicated what should be simple. If you take something new that you have never taken before and then are hurt or nearly die, you don’t take that thing again. Food allergists work on assumptions all the time, and make connections. Conversely, for decades the tobacco industry argued that there was no connection between smoking and lung cancer.
Even a rat, an alpha rat, lives longer than most of the other rats in the colony by observing if rats die after feeding from a particular food source. If the junior rats die, it will not take the poisoned bait. No one can assure the rat that there is no causal link, or something now called SARDS – Sudden Adult Rat Death Syndrome. It gives pause to know that rats were here many millions of years before humans, and will be here millions of years after."
Scientific Doctrine Holds That Causality Must Be Assumed if Healthy People “Die Suddenly” After the COVID Vaccines. Follow the Science.
Scientific Doctrine Holds That Causality Must Be Assumed if Healthy People “Die Suddenly” After the COVID Vaccines. Follow the Science.
"The Bradford Hill Criteria were established in 1965 by the English epidemiologist Sir Austin Bradford Hill, to provide epidemiologic evidence of a causal relationship between a presumed cause and an observed effect. The criteria merely breaks down, elegantly, a thought process for determining if Event A causes Event B following it. Does it happen a lot? Are there any other good explanations for Event B? Is Event A something new? Is there is a plausible mechanism for what is taking place?
In the case of death and debilitation following the COVID vaccines, Dr. Peter McCullough and other doctors and scientists argue, the answers are all yes.
But others argue that this makes very complicated what should be simple. If you take something new that you have never taken before and then are hurt or nearly die, you don’t take that thing again. Food allergists work on assumptions all the time, and make connections. Conversely, for decades the tobacco industry argued that there was no connection between smoking and lung cancer.
Even a rat, an alpha rat, lives longer than most of the other rats in the colony by observing if rats die after feeding from a particular food source. If the junior rats die, it will not take the poisoned bait. No one can assure the rat that there is no causal link, or something now called SARDS – Sudden Adult Rat Death Syndrome. It gives pause to know that rats were here many millions of years before humans, and will be here millions of years after."
