Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nuke weapons are expensive to make, hard to build and easily taken out by the worlds major powers.They have no desire to win in any secular sense. That is the difference. Those who are too young and/or naive don't realize that Iran's theocratic, totalitarian goal is apocalyptic.Iran will never launchnulcear iran will be the primary reason the GOP will take the white house, the nominee needs to go to manhattan and warn them what will happen to new york if we let Iran build bombs.
there's no chance of winning
This will get Walker lots of votes from the Right.
Scott Walker We might have to take military action on Day One - The Washington Post
A dispute has erupted between Scott Walker and Jeb Bush over how to handle the task of undoing Obama’s Iran deal as president, with Bush hinting that Walker is approaching the issue with a lack of maturity, and Walker suggesting that Bush is not zealous enough about confronting the enemy.
Walker is also saying that it’s “very possible” the next president will have to take military action on Day One of his presidency — though it’s unclear whether he means against Iran in particular, or more generally.
<more>
Iran will never launchnulcear iran will be the primary reason the GOP will take the white house, the nominee needs to go to manhattan and warn them what will happen to new york if we let Iran build bombs.
there's no chance of winning
I think Scott means he'll conduct military exercises on Day 1 in hostile Democrat controlled cities to simulate counter-insurgency
Actually, energy supply negates that and unfortunately we have a president who intentionally stifles energy supply.Yeah we need more war to keep the bankers and defense contractors even more flush with cash.
War is always the health of the state.
Not sure what the issue is here...?This will get Walker lots of votes from the Right.
Scott Walker We might have to take military action on Day One - The Washington Post
A dispute has erupted between Scott Walker and Jeb Bush over how to handle the task of undoing Obama’s Iran deal as president, with Bush hinting that Walker is approaching the issue with a lack of maturity, and Walker suggesting that Bush is not zealous enough about confronting the enemy.
Walker is also saying that it’s “very possible” the next president will have to take military action on Day One of his presidency — though it’s unclear whether he means against Iran in particular, or more generally.
<more>
There is, if "winning" means "the destruction of Israel".Iran will never launchnulcear iran will be the primary reason the GOP will take the white house, the nominee needs to go to manhattan and warn them what will happen to new york if we let Iran build bombs.
there's no chance of winning
No. That it the difference in this scenario. They are religious fanatics. They will consider world destruction as a victory and feel they are destined by allah to make that happen.Nuke weapons are expensive to make, hard to build and easily taken out by the worlds major powers.They have no desire to win in any secular sense. That is the difference. Those who are too young and/or naive don't realize that Iran's theocratic, totalitarian goal is apocalyptic.Iran will never launchnulcear iran will be the primary reason the GOP will take the white house, the nominee needs to go to manhattan and warn them what will happen to new york if we let Iran build bombs.
there's no chance of winning
There will not be a WW3 with nukes b/c no one can win, the iranians are crazy but they still want to win and part of winning is being alive.
Not so different than religious fanatics right here in the US.No. That it the difference in this scenario. They are religious fanatics. They will consider world destruction as a victory and feel they are destined by allah to make that happen.Nuke weapons are expensive to make, hard to build and easily taken out by the worlds major powers.They have no desire to win in any secular sense. That is the difference. Those who are too young and/or naive don't realize that Iran's theocratic, totalitarian goal is apocalyptic.Iran will never launchnulcear iran will be the primary reason the GOP will take the white house, the nominee needs to go to manhattan and warn them what will happen to new york if we let Iran build bombs.
there's no chance of winning
There will not be a WW3 with nukes b/c no one can win, the iranians are crazy but they still want to win and part of winning is being alive.
We have islimic religious fanatics here in the US. That's what this is about. Islime poses way more of a threat than any other religious fanatics and to dispute that is bias and denial.Not so different than religious fanatics right here in the US.No. That it the difference in this scenario. They are religious fanatics. They will consider world destruction as a victory and feel they are destined by allah to make that happen.Nuke weapons are expensive to make, hard to build and easily taken out by the worlds major powers.They have no desire to win in any secular sense. That is the difference. Those who are too young and/or naive don't realize that Iran's theocratic, totalitarian goal is apocalyptic.Iran will never launchnulcear iran will be the primary reason the GOP will take the white house, the nominee needs to go to manhattan and warn them what will happen to new york if we let Iran build bombs.
there's no chance of winning
There will not be a WW3 with nukes b/c no one can win, the iranians are crazy but they still want to win and part of winning is being alive.
Evangelical Christians Want to Start WWIII to Speed the Second Coming ... and Atheist Neocons are Using Religion to Rile Them Up to Justify War Against Iran Washington s BlogWe have islimic religious fanatics here in the US. That's what this is about. Islime poses way more of a threat than any other religious fanatics and to dispute that is bias and denial.Not so different than religious fanatics right here in the US.No. That it the difference in this scenario. They are religious fanatics. They will consider world destruction as a victory and feel they are destined by allah to make that happen.Nuke weapons are expensive to make, hard to build and easily taken out by the worlds major powers.They have no desire to win in any secular sense. That is the difference. Those who are too young and/or naive don't realize that Iran's theocratic, totalitarian goal is apocalyptic.Iran will never launch
there's no chance of winning
There will not be a WW3 with nukes b/c no one can win, the iranians are crazy but they still want to win and part of winning is being alive.
That's what I mean by denial.Evangelical Christians Want to Start WWIII to Speed the Second Coming ... and Atheist Neocons are Using Religion to Rile Them Up to Justify War Against Iran Washington s BlogWe have islimic religious fanatics here in the US. That's what this is about. Islime poses way more of a threat than any other religious fanatics and to dispute that is bias and denial.Not so different than religious fanatics right here in the US.No. That it the difference in this scenario. They are religious fanatics. They will consider world destruction as a victory and feel they are destined by allah to make that happen.Nuke weapons are expensive to make, hard to build and easily taken out by the worlds major powers.They have no desire to win in any secular sense. That is the difference. Those who are too young and/or naive don't realize that Iran's theocratic, totalitarian goal is apocalyptic.
There will not be a WW3 with nukes b/c no one can win, the iranians are crazy but they still want to win and part of winning is being alive.
Millions of Evangelical Christians Want to Start WWIII to Speed the “Second Coming” … and Atheist Neocons are Using Religion to Rile Them Up to Justify War Against Iran
Posted on February 18, 2012 by WashingtonsBlog
Millions of Evangelical Christians Want to Start World War III … to Speed Up the Second Coming
The Founding Fathers weren’t particularly anti-Islam.
But millions of Americans believe that Christ will not come again until Israel wipes out its competitors and there is widespread war in the Middle East. Some of these folks want to start a huge fire of war and death and destruction, so that Jesus comes quickly.
According to French President Chirac, Bush told him that the Iraq war was needed to bring on the apocalypse:
<more>
it's just leftist pussies responding with fear whenever a con speaks.Not sure what the issue is here...?This will get Walker lots of votes from the Right.
Scott Walker We might have to take military action on Day One - The Washington Post
A dispute has erupted between Scott Walker and Jeb Bush over how to handle the task of undoing Obama’s Iran deal as president, with Bush hinting that Walker is approaching the issue with a lack of maturity, and Walker suggesting that Bush is not zealous enough about confronting the enemy.
Walker is also saying that it’s “very possible” the next president will have to take military action on Day One of his presidency — though it’s unclear whether he means against Iran in particular, or more generally.
<more>
that's so far from factual is shocking.Not so different than religious fanatics right here in the US.No. That it the difference in this scenario. They are religious fanatics. They will consider world destruction as a victory and feel they are destined by allah to make that happen.Nuke weapons are expensive to make, hard to build and easily taken out by the worlds major powers.They have no desire to win in any secular sense. That is the difference. Those who are too young and/or naive don't realize that Iran's theocratic, totalitarian goal is apocalyptic.Iran will never launchnulcear iran will be the primary reason the GOP will take the white house, the nominee needs to go to manhattan and warn them what will happen to new york if we let Iran build bombs.
there's no chance of winning
There will not be a WW3 with nukes b/c no one can win, the iranians are crazy but they still want to win and part of winning is being alive.
Presupposes that Iran would do this to win a war......Iran will never launchnulcear iran will be the primary reason the GOP will take the white house, the nominee needs to go to manhattan and warn them what will happen to new york if we let Iran build bombs.
there's no chance of winning
hopefully someone will take out their underground city before they can finish building it, or maybe God will find out and send a 9.0 to IranSo, now it looks like Iran needs nukes to protect itself from Nuts like Walker. Holy shit...
