See who was crowned 'Miss AI' in the first-ever beauty pageant for AI influencers.

[1srelluc]

See who was crowned 'Miss AI' in the first-ever beauty pageant for AI influencers.

The first-ever beauty pageant for AI — not human — influencers has ended. Take a look at who won and the top 10 finalists.

www.businessinsider.com

Fanvue held its first "Miss AI" contest, where its finalists aren't human but, instead, artificial intelligence personas from around the world.

The winner and runners-up were announced on Monday. Personas from Morocco, France, and Portugal topped the list.

Winner:


2nd place:


3rd place:


WTF that third "children of the corn" thing is I have no idea.....I'd hate to see 4th place....Maybe something like this:

#2 for the win.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Is number three Eddie Redmayne in drag?

 

[The Duke]

Is number three Eddie Redmayne in drag?

 

[martybegan]

1 and 2. Nice.

3 and 4....

 

[toobfreak]

Looks like the girl Joe Biden shagged in college the morning after.

 

[Cougarbear]

See who was crowned 'Miss AI' in the first-ever beauty pageant for AI influencers.

The first-ever beauty pageant for AI — not human — influencers has ended. Take a look at who won and the top 10 finalists.

www.businessinsider.com

Fanvue held its first "Miss AI" contest, where its finalists aren't human but, instead, artificial intelligence personas from around the world.

The winner and runners-up were announced on Monday. Personas from Morocco, France, and Portugal topped the list.

Winner:


2nd place:


3rd place:


WTF that third "children of the corn" thing is I have no idea.....I'd hate to see 4th place....Maybe something like this:

#2 for the win.

 

[Nobody911]

See who was crowned 'Miss AI' in the first-ever beauty pageant for AI influencers.

The first-ever beauty pageant for AI — not human — influencers has ended. Take a look at who won and the top 10 finalists.

www.businessinsider.com

Fanvue held its first "Miss AI" contest, where its finalists aren't human but, instead, artificial intelligence personas from around the world.

The winner and runners-up were announced on Monday. Personas from Morocco, France, and Portugal topped the list.

Winner:


2nd place:


3rd place:


WTF that third "children of the corn" thing is I have no idea.....I'd hate to see 4th place....Maybe something like this:

#2 for the win.

Legal Status of AI-Generated Images in the US

The legal status of AI-generated images in the US is a complex and evolving area, with several key considerations:

Copyright Protection:

• Copyright protection in the US is primarily focused on the human-authored aspects of a work, independent of and not affecting the copyright status of the AI-generated material itself.
• The US Copyright Office has indicated that AI systems, including image generators, cannot be considered the author of the material they produce, and as a result, AI-generated works are not eligible for copyright protection.
• However, there is some flexibility in this realm, as the Copyright Office has left the door open to granting copyright protections to works with AI-generated elements, depending on the circumstances and how the AI tool was used to create the final work.

Legal Risks and Disputes:

• There are potential legal risks for end users if their AI-generated images become involved in a copyright dispute.
• Getty Images has been involved in a lawsuit against an AI generator suspected of using unlicensed photos to create AI images, highlighting the importance of adhering to copyright licenses.

Challenges and Ethical Considerations:

• The deluge of AI-generated text, images, and music has prompted complicated legal questions, challenging our understanding of ownership, fairness, and the nature of creativity.
• The fast-growing field of generative AI has raised novel intellectual property issues, with legal scholars offering different interpretations of AI models and their relationship to copyright law.

In summary, the legal status of AI-generated images in the US is characterized by a nuanced approach to copyright protection, ongoing legal challenges, and evolving interpretations of AI's role in the creative process. The Copyright Office's position and the potential for copyright protections in specific circumstances reflect the dynamic nature of this legal landscape.

Sources :

1. New US copyright rules protect only AI art with ‘human authorship’

2. AI and Copyright Law: What We Know | Built In

3. https://www.engadget.com/ai-generat...opyrighted-us-government-rules-174243933.html

4. https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-generated-art-cannot-receive-copyrights-us-court-says-2023-08-21/

 

[1srelluc]

Legal Status of AI-Generated Images in the US

The legal status of AI-generated images in the US is a complex and evolving area, with several key considerations:

Copyright Protection:

• Copyright protection in the US is primarily focused on the human-authored aspects of a work, independent of and not affecting the copyright status of the AI-generated material itself.
• The US Copyright Office has indicated that AI systems, including image generators, cannot be considered the author of the material they produce, and as a result, AI-generated works are not eligible for copyright protection.
• However, there is some flexibility in this realm, as the Copyright Office has left the door open to granting copyright protections to works with AI-generated elements, depending on the circumstances and how the AI tool was used to create the final work.

Legal Risks and Disputes:

• There are potential legal risks for end users if their AI-generated images become involved in a copyright dispute.
• Getty Images has been involved in a lawsuit against an AI generator suspected of using unlicensed photos to create AI images, highlighting the importance of adhering to copyright licenses.

Challenges and Ethical Considerations:

• The deluge of AI-generated text, images, and music has prompted complicated legal questions, challenging our understanding of ownership, fairness, and the nature of creativity.
• The fast-growing field of generative AI has raised novel intellectual property issues, with legal scholars offering different interpretations of AI models and their relationship to copyright law.

In summary, the legal status of AI-generated images in the US is characterized by a nuanced approach to copyright protection, ongoing legal challenges, and evolving interpretations of AI's role in the creative process. The Copyright Office's position and the potential for copyright protections in specific circumstances reflect the dynamic nature of this legal landscape.

Sources :

1. New US copyright rules protect only AI art with ‘human authorship’

2. AI and Copyright Law: What We Know | Built In

3. https://www.engadget.com/ai-generat...opyrighted-us-government-rules-174243933.html

4. https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-generated-art-cannot-receive-copyrights-us-court-says-2023-08-21/

And just why do we need to know this?

 

[bluzman61]

2nd Place is QUITE attractive!