Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,826
- 350
The following was written by a Huffington Post writer, but was removed from the site shortly after he submitted it. HuffPo did not explain why but it's not hard to guess.
I think the Clinton Foundation should be investigated considering the favors Hillary did for countries who contributed heavily to the foundation. I'm sure Hillary supporters will claim there are just many, many coincidences but if you follow the money and see how it likely led to favorable decisions for the donors, it's hard to dismiss. Of course, even if the FBI recommends an indictment of the foundation, Obama's DOJ likely wouldn't act on it.
"The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
Activity considered to be racketeering may include bribery, counterfeiting, money laundering, embezzlement, illegal gambling, kidnapping, murder, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other nefarious business practices.
James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/30/exclusive-huffington-post-writer-editors-deleted-my-article-on-hillarys-imminent-indictment-disabled-me-from-writing/
The original link to the article, which has been removed from HuffPo-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-to-be-indicted-on-federal-racketeering_us_574af94be4b0009f3d848d20
I think the Clinton Foundation should be investigated considering the favors Hillary did for countries who contributed heavily to the foundation. I'm sure Hillary supporters will claim there are just many, many coincidences but if you follow the money and see how it likely led to favorable decisions for the donors, it's hard to dismiss. Of course, even if the FBI recommends an indictment of the foundation, Obama's DOJ likely wouldn't act on it.
"The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
Activity considered to be racketeering may include bribery, counterfeiting, money laundering, embezzlement, illegal gambling, kidnapping, murder, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other nefarious business practices.
James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/30/exclusive-huffington-post-writer-editors-deleted-my-article-on-hillarys-imminent-indictment-disabled-me-from-writing/
The original link to the article, which has been removed from HuffPo-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-to-be-indicted-on-federal-racketeering_us_574af94be4b0009f3d848d20