Socialism is slavery

What is communism:



Too far left for me!
You are talking nonsense. Socialism denies private property. In any case, what is meant by this now.

Proudhonism is called "socialism". Proudhonism is precisely the "capitalism" of the free market
 
Socialism of the USSR model (with the exception of the Khrushchev period) is capitalism with a complete monopoly. In "ordinary" capitalism, the monopoly is almost complete, because corporations have grown together with the state and banks. It's the same thing, the only difference is the decorations.
 
In an effort to make some sense out of that!
When the capitalist fails to sell his product and it would be spoiled by the next business day, he serves his business better to not sell the product at a greatly reduced price or give it away to people.

Doing that would damage his market on the following day.

In a socialist system, the product not sold would be handled in a different way perhaps?

Food Banks harm the capitalist's business, but the good done is considered to outweigh the bad in most cases. The capitalist may even contribute to the food bank.
Statement: In an effort to make some sense out of that!

Response: Your sarcasm fell flat and didn't answer the question.
Socialism or Market Capitalism, that was the question, it was a simple question, related to the statement in post #11.

In the United States capitalism is regulated; provide an example of Laissez-faire Capitalism that is legal in the US.
 
Statement: In an effort to make some sense out of that!

Response: Your sarcasm fell flat and didn't answer the question.
Socialism or Market Capitalism, that was the question, it was a simple question, related to the statement in post #11.

In the United States capitalism is regulated; provide an example of Laissez-faire Capitalism that is legal in the US.
The problem is the exact opposite of Laissez faire capitalism, with too little government interference. Have you gotten yourself reversed on the meaning?

Capitalism has been allowed to steal arrordable health care from the people. Corrupt government allowed it to happen.
 
I'm fine with theory. People have been fooled by the imaginary difference between capitalism and socialism, but in fact both of these systems are equally left, based on the exploitation of the proletarians who do not have property, and both are opposite to the right model of decentralization and free market
I don't know what you are trying to describe but I hope you get around to it eventually.
 
The problem is the exact opposite of Laissez faire capitalism, with too little government interference. Have you gotten yourself reversed on the meaning?

Capitalism has been allowed to steal arrordable health care from the people. Corrupt government allowed it to happen.
I know the meaning, the person who made the claim is the one who doesn't.

You're correct that of the two parties, R & D, the former put private profits before the people, and the latter put people before private profits. That is simple. Examples are Gun Control and Obamacare.
 
You're correct that of the two parties, R & D, the former put private profits before the people, and the latter put people before private profits. That is simple. Examples are Gun Control and Obamacare.
I didn't say that and I don't believe it's true. If you want an explanation then you're going to need to behave appropriately. Kneejerk oneliners won't do it with me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top