Sotomayor, et al: Assault weapons are "commonly available semi-automatic rifles".

[M14 Shooter]

Their dissent in Cargill:

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR,
with whom JUSTICE KAGAN and JUSTICE JACKSON join, dissenting.

On October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from a hotel
room overlooking an outdoor concert in Las Vegas, Nevada,
in what would become the deadliest mass shooting in U. S.
history. Within a matter of minutes, using several hundred
rounds of ammunition, the shooter killed 58 people and
wounded over 500. He did so by affixing bump stocks to
commonly available, semiautomatic rifles. These simple
devices harness a rifle’s recoil energy to slide the rifle back
and forth and repeatedly “bump” the shooter’s stationary
trigger finger, creating rapid fire. All the shooter had to do
was pull the trigger and press the gun forward. The bump
stock did the rest.

According to the liberal minority on the court - AR15s are "commonly available"
If AR15s are "commonly available", they are plainly "in common use."
If AR15s are "commonly available" they are plainly not "dangerous and unusual"

As the various state 'assault weapon' bans their way to the USSC, the pro-gun plaintiff / defendants can add Sotomayro, Kagan and Jackson's dissent to their arguments against said bans.

Thank God for DEI hires!

 

[Concerned American]

Their dissent in Cargill:

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR,
with whom JUSTICE KAGAN and JUSTICE JACKSON join, dissenting.

On October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from a hotel
room overlooking an outdoor concert in Las Vegas, Nevada,
in what would become the deadliest mass shooting in U. S.
history. Within a matter of minutes, using several hundred
rounds of ammunition, the shooter killed 58 people and
wounded over 500. He did so by affixing bump stocks to
commonly available, semiautomatic rifles. These simple
devices harness a rifle’s recoil energy to slide the rifle back
and forth and repeatedly “bump” the shooter’s stationary
trigger finger, creating rapid fire. All the shooter had to do
was pull the trigger and press the gun forward. The bump
stock did the rest.

According to the liberal minority on the court - AR15s are "commonly available"
If AR15s are "commonly available", they are plainly "in common use."
If AR15s are "commonly available" they are plainly not "dangerous and unusual"

As the various state 'assault weapon' bans their way to the USSC, the pro-gun plaintiff / defendants can add Sotomayro, Kagan and Jackson's dissent to their arguments against said bans.

Thank God for DEI hires!

CA attempted an assault weapons ban in the 80s among other times. They tried to use a thumb hole in the stock of a rifle to define an assault weapon. SMFH. They will grasp at anything to remove your rights.

 

[Failzero]

CA attempted an assault weapons ban in the 80s among other times. They tried to use a thumb hole in the stock of a rifle to define an assault weapon. SMFH. They will grasp at anything to remove your rights.

Democommies will try & Paint the GOP as the Real Gungrabbers Again soon

 

[rampart]

Their dissent in Cargill:

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR,
with whom JUSTICE KAGAN and JUSTICE JACKSON join, dissenting.

On October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from a hotel
room overlooking an outdoor concert in Las Vegas, Nevada,
in what would become the deadliest mass shooting in U. S.
history. Within a matter of minutes, using several hundred
rounds of ammunition, the shooter killed 58 people and
wounded over 500. He did so by affixing bump stocks to
commonly available, semiautomatic rifles. These simple
devices harness a rifle’s recoil energy to slide the rifle back
and forth and repeatedly “bump” the shooter’s stationary
trigger finger, creating rapid fire. All the shooter had to do
was pull the trigger and press the gun forward. The bump
stock did the rest.

According to the liberal minority on the court - AR15s are "commonly available"
If AR15s are "commonly available", they are plainly "in common use."
If AR15s are "commonly available" they are plainly not "dangerous and unusual"

As the various state 'assault weapon' bans their way to the USSC, the pro-gun plaintiff / defendants can add Sotomayro, Kagan and Jackson's dissent to their arguments against said bans.

Thank God for DEI hires!

who told you a rifle is not dangerouis?

 

[Concerned American]

who told you a rifle is not dangerouis?

How is a rifle dangerous? Because you trip over it? The rifle is an inanimate object that can do NOTHING without HUMAN intervention. Address the problem moron. It isn't the rifle.

 

[Oddball]

The "wise latina" is dumb as a fucking tree.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Their dissent in Cargill:

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR,
with whom JUSTICE KAGAN and JUSTICE JACKSON join, dissenting.

On October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from a hotel
room overlooking an outdoor concert in Las Vegas, Nevada,
in what would become the deadliest mass shooting in U. S.
history. Within a matter of minutes, using several hundred
rounds of ammunition, the shooter killed 58 people and
wounded over 500. He did so by affixing bump stocks to
commonly available, semiautomatic rifles. These simple
devices harness a rifle’s recoil energy to slide the rifle back
and forth and repeatedly “bump” the shooter’s stationary
trigger finger, creating rapid fire. All the shooter had to do
was pull the trigger and press the gun forward. The bump
stock did the rest.

According to the liberal minority on the court - AR15s are "commonly available"
If AR15s are "commonly available", they are plainly "in common use."
If AR15s are "commonly available" they are plainly not "dangerous and unusual"

As the various state 'assault weapon' bans their way to the USSC, the pro-gun plaintiff / defendants can add Sotomayro, Kagan and Jackson's dissent to their arguments against said bans.

Thank God for DEI hires!

What about bypassing the courts and taking the guns from crazy people?

Crazy people shouldn't have guns.

 

[Lord-Humungus]

What about bypassing the courts and taking the guns from crazy people?

Crazy people shouldn't have guns.

Then go through the due process.

 

[Failzero]

What about bypassing the courts and taking the guns from crazy people?

Crazy people shouldn't have guns.

Piss test for Illegal Drugs & SSRIs with every 4473 Form ( I’m ok with that )

 

[Catsnmeters]

Then go through the due process.

I heard it takes to long.

 

[Failzero]

I

I heard it takes to long.

In Ca. ( One Weapon per month Handgun or Long Gun ) ( 10 day wait period ) 47.00 $ DROS ( BGC ) fee and soon ( 11% Extra Tax on Firearms & Ammo )

 

[Lord-Humungus]

I heard it takes to long.

So fuck our rights. Hell no improve the process instead of ignoring it

 

[1srelluc]

The "wise latina" is dumb as a fucking tree.

Quit disparaging trees, at least they are alive and provide useful service....."Dumb as a post" is the proper usage.

 

[M14 Shooter]

who told you a rifle is not dangerouis?

"Dangerous and usual"
To wit:

2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

"Dangerous and usual" is conjunctive; if something is common, it cannot be unusual - thus AR15s are not "dangerous and unusual".

 

[M14 Shooter]

The "wise latina" is dumb as a fucking tree.

And the other DEI hire cannot define "woman".

 

[M14 Shooter]

What about bypassing the courts and taking the guns from crazy people?
Crazy people shouldn't have guns.

Can't stay on topic, eh?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Their dissent in Cargill:

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR,
with whom JUSTICE KAGAN and JUSTICE JACKSON join, dissenting.

On October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from a hotel
room overlooking an outdoor concert in Las Vegas, Nevada,
in what would become the deadliest mass shooting in U. S.
history. Within a matter of minutes, using several hundred
rounds of ammunition, the shooter killed 58 people and
wounded over 500. He did so by affixing bump stocks to
commonly available, semiautomatic rifles. These simple
devices harness a rifle’s recoil energy to slide the rifle back
and forth and repeatedly “bump” the shooter’s stationary
trigger finger, creating rapid fire. All the shooter had to do
was pull the trigger and press the gun forward. The bump
stock did the rest.

According to the liberal minority on the court - AR15s are "commonly available"
If AR15s are "commonly available", they are plainly "in common use."
If AR15s are "commonly available" they are plainly not "dangerous and unusual"

As the various state 'assault weapon' bans their way to the USSC, the pro-gun plaintiff / defendants can add Sotomayro, Kagan and Jackson's dissent to their arguments against said bans.

Thank God for DEI hires!

If you showed those three DEI morons a picture of a Star Trek Phaser they’d want to ban it because it looks scary.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

who told you a rifle is not dangerouis?

Alec Baldwin.

 

[whitehall]

Typically lefties focus on the weapon rather than the shooter when the mass shooter is typically left wing. What do we know about Stephen Paddock? Almost nobody even recognizes the name but the media keeps us aware "bump stocks". What does that say about today's media and the alleged expertise of the FBI that couldn't come up with a motive for an attack on a Trump rally in Vegas?

 

[M14 Shooter]

If you showed those three DEI morons a picture of a Star Trek Phaser they’d want to ban it because it looks scary.

Which necessitates they believe it is real.
Plausible.