Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,175
- 12,741
Why don't you have a look at the work of Shakun and Marcott and count the citations. YOU obviously don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Mating different datasets where necessary and completely characterized, is acceptable and widely used.
Marcott ADMITTED that the Instrumental part of his chart is NO GOOD!
Shakun's paper is junk science since he did some serious statistical malpractice as shown in detail HERE and failed to be honest about the CO2 data as shown HERE.
Number of citations are irrelevant, reproducibility with full data access is.