Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.That's where the controversy is. What's the Word of God? Is it equality? Is it changing to be more popular? Is the Word an admonishing to be modern. If a denomination believes this is the Word of God they have an obligation to change and adapt. Those that find this self serving nonsense must follow a more traditional form of practice.
Agreed, just looking for discussion on this with that association, and the topic in general.Every religious sect has a right to establish its statement of faith. Is that so hard to understand?
Nope....Baptists use the Bible mostly the KJV1611 as our rule of faith. It was written by man inspired by God. In it, women have leadership in the congregation, but the role of the pastor is for men. For example, Phoebe was a woman with a leadership position in the new testament and was well respected. In the old testament, Sara was a judge and prophet.
Women priests or pastors mean you are so far removed from any of the Abrahamic faiths that why even pretend.Thoughts on this? We have women priests, and Da Wimmimz have long been the life blood of the Church.
Thoughts on this? We have women priests, and Da Wimmimz have long been the life blood of the Church.
From another perspective:
People should understand how the Southern Baptist Convention is organized. They are no different than other Baptist sects. There might be some exceptions but historically Baptist have a tradition of individual church authority. There is no teeth to anything they decide. Individual churches have the freedom to organize their church anyway their congregation sees fit. Southern Baptist are only affiliated with each other for fundraising capacity not doctrinal pontificating.
Southern Baptists also boycotted Disney in the early 2000s. How many congregations participated in that?
But these churches might be tossed from the convention....meaning they don't get any say in the convention, the committees or have access to the SBC resources.
But these churches might be tossed from the convention....meaning they don't get any say in the convention, the committees or have access to the SBC resources.
Yes, but some of those traditions suck. I was a member of a church that gave a million every year to the convention. Not a huge church by any means...maybe 1k active. But everything we had was paid for....including mission plant church. And we paid their bills.That is a possibility. It just goes against Baptist tradition. Southern Baptist churches are a very loose confederation. There is no authority at the top. The primary benefit of a church belonging to the convention is that they get to donate money to it. It is really weird if you think about it. They are withholding their ability to give to the Southern Baptist Convention.
Yes it does. Scripture teaches specific roles for leadership structure.The purpose of religion is to get the word of god to the people
Doesnt matter who the messenger is
Thoughts on this? We have women priests, and Da Wimmimz have long been the life blood of the Church.
From another perspective:
Do those standards apply to leadership in secular organizations like governments? If so, who was the more qualified candidate in the 2016 election and the 2020 election?Yes it does. Scripture teaches specific roles for leadership structure.
"God sets up leaders or deposes them" (Daniel to Nebacanezzar)Do those standards apply to leadership in secular organizations like governments? If so, who was the more qualified candidate in the 2016 election and the 2020 election?
Bonus: Who is the least qualified using those standards in the current slate of known Republican Candidates for President?