State-Sponsored Censorship

EvMetro

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
10,328
6,740
970
Here is a great article about the state sponsored censorship problem that is defining our current political landscape.

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

 
Government deciding what is "disinformation" and working with private companies to suppress it isn't censorship. Um ... yeah ...



Democrats are just being more and more Nazi's

Considering this has been debunked in the previous threads I shall let you wallow in yer own juices.
 
Considering this has been debunked in the previous threads I shall let you wallow in yer own juices.

What the fuck? Psaki is now disinformation? She's a Marxist like you are. Now even she isn't left enough for you?

She clearly says on the clip that facebook is censoring information working with the Biden administration.

If Trump were censoring leftist propaganda, you'd be birthing a cow and sputtering broken English rather than your supporting Biden in broken English
 
What the fuck? Psaki is now disinformation? She's a Marxist like you are. Now even she isn't left enough for you?

She clearly says on the clip that facebook is censoring information working with the Biden administration.

If Trump were censoring leftist propaganda, you'd be birthing a cow and sputtering broken English rather than your supporting Biden in broken English

You dope.

Misinformation: The White House And Jen Psaki Didn't Actually Call For Censorship Of Social Media​


The fact that the president took aim at a social media platform has been widely called out by many on social media platforms, suggesting it was censorship, while others even saw it as a First Amendment violation. However, that isn't accurate.

 
Here is a great article about the state sponsored censorship problem that is defining our current political landscape.

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

OHMYGODOHMYGOD DO YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THAT PSEUDO SCIENCE WILL HAVE TO BACK UP WITH FACTS
 
You dope.

Misinformation: The White House And Jen Psaki Didn't Actually Call For Censorship Of Social Media​


The fact that the president took aim at a social media platform has been widely called out by many on social media platforms, suggesting it was censorship, while others even saw it as a First Amendment violation. However, that isn't accurate.

she clearly stated they were flagging posts for facebook. Dude, you should have your hearing and eyes checked.
 
she says they are flagging posts for facebook!!!!! It came out of her mouth. That's illegal!!!!!!!!!
"You shouldn't be banned from one platform and not others if you are providing misinformation out there," is what she said, but many took those words out of context.
 
You dope.

Misinformation: The White House And Jen Psaki Didn't Actually Call For Censorship Of Social Media​


The fact that the president took aim at a social media platform has been widely called out by many on social media platforms, suggesting it was censorship, while others even saw it as a First Amendment violation. However, that isn't accurate.


Government deciding what posts are "disinformation" and "flagging them for facebook" isn't censorship.

Gotcha.

Or in your native language, bah, bah ...

If the Trump admin did that then you'd be screeching. Of course since you speak broken English no one would know what you said. But wow, you'd be upset.

But it's Biden, no worries. Censor away!
 

Forum List

Back
Top