Strzok Authored Draft of Comey Letter to Congress about Clinton Emails on Weiner Laptop!

[Skylar]

What are you babbling on about "Dominoes coupons"? I don't have the faintest idea what you're talking about with that...do you?

As you've condemned Obama for merely emailing Hillary's private server...in any capacity. When he would have only been guilty of a legal violation if he'd sent classified information.

Yet in the pseudo-legal wasteland of your mind, merely sending an Email to Hillary void of any classified content makes Obama 'legally culpable'. By that absurdity, Domino's would be equally 'culpable' for sending her a coupon for $5 dollar medium one topping pies.

Alas, your pseudo-legal analysis is gloriously irrelevant to the actual law or precedent. As demonstrated elegantly by the findings of both the FBI and the Inspector General.

Did Dominoes send the coupon using an alias so that nobody would know that it was them doing the sending? Did Dominoes then claim not to know that the email address they sent the coupon to even existed?

What law would have been broken in either case?

You keep making up standards of 'legal cupability' based on your imagination. Despite no evidence of *any* classified information being sent or received by Obama from or to Hillary's server, you offer us the meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish that Obama would have been legally culpable if Hillary had criminally charged.

Why? Because you imagined it must be so, that's why.

And demonstrating yet again why you vs the FBI and Inspector General on the application of the law has the same winner every time:

Not you.

 

[Oldstyle]

"Obama repeatedly guaranteed the White House would not seek to influence a decision by the Justice Department or FBI about whether to prosecute Clinton if they find evidence of wrongdoing.

"I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations," Obama said. "I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it."

Sigh....remember the days?

Now we live in an era where Trump actively tries to influence investigations, demands that the AG prosecute his political enemies, and berates the AG for indicting republicans at a time that wasn't politically convenient.

This administration is rotting from the head.

Interesting...so when Obama made his statement back in April of that year, that although Clinton may have mishandled some classified materials that it wasn't a violation of law and then his FBI Director basically takes that same position later in the summer...that isn't influencing investigations? Gee, Skylar...you on the left call for Trump to be brought up on charges of "Obstruction of Justice" for doing EXACTLY what Barack Obama did!

 

[Skylar]

Sensitive....and classified, are two different distinctions. The emails released today by Democrats in the Senate were sensitive. Nothing they released was classified.

And the distinction is what makes your pseudo-legal gibberish such a giggle fest. As you're arguing that Obama is culpable for merely communicating with clinton on her own server. Apparently in any capacity

Which, of course, is nonsense.

I'll add yet another failed claim of yours to the rhetorical midden heap.

We won't ever know what Obama communicated to Clinton on her private servers, Skylar because Obama invoked Executive Privilege to keep that secret.

So with zero evidence that anything that Obama sent her was 'classified', you imagine it was and then draw a nested series of pseudo-legal gibberish conclusions?

Um, no.

Obama only would have been culpable if he'd sent or received classified information. And there is no evidence that he did.

This thread is a was

[quto
We do however know that Clinton routinely communicated classified information through those two private unsecured servers hidden in her house and hid the existence of those servers from Congressional investigators looking into the Benghazi debacle.

No, we don't 'know' that. You keep mistaking your imagination for knowldge.

Out of literally tens of thousands of emails, there were a few dozen that contained classified information. And those were almost entirely forwarded to Hillary without classification markings. You're offering us a conspiracy theory backed by jack shit as your entire basis of reasoning.

Your imagination is not a standard of evidence. Nor is your baseless insinuation.

Is that literally all you've got? Bullshit claims like "they started with their conclusion before the investigation" or the "Domino's Coupon' theory of legal culpability.....and then you just abandon it and come up with brand new conspiracy batshit?

If so, that was easy.

Obama is "culpable" if he's communicating official government business with anyone in his administration through private email accounts!

Says who?

Again, you keep making these pseudo-legal assertions backed by jack shit. Assertions you have no evidence to support. By your own admission, you have no idea what was in Obama's emails.

But from that starting place of pristine ignorance, you're going to tell us that you know better than both the FBI and the Inspector General on what constitutes a legal violation for Obama?

I'm sorry.....but your delusions of legal expertise aren't evidence. They're an excuse for it.

Neither the FBI...nor the Inspector General...or myself have any idea what was in Obama's emails! He's protected himself by invoking Executive Privilege on all those communications. That doesn't however change the fact that he was indeed sending emails to an email account that he later claimed he didn't know existed...and he was sending them using an alias! That positively REEKS and you know it!

And how do you know what the FBI or the Inspector General knows?

Why, you imagine it must be so of course. Your pony's one trick: Imagination. Back in reality, you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about, as demonstrated here:

In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was shown an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, but the longtime Clinton aide did not recognize the name of the sender.

Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal

But the FBI has no idea what's in the email they're literally showing Abedin to review?

LMAO! Imagination: 0. Reality: 1.

Try again. This time with better imaginary bullshit that this JV nonsense you've been pinching off.

 

[Oldstyle]

What are you babbling on about "Dominoes coupons"? I don't have the faintest idea what you're talking about with that...do you?

As you've condemned Obama for merely emailing Hillary's private server...in any capacity. When he would have only been guilty of a legal violation if he'd sent classified information.

Yet in the pseudo-legal wasteland of your mind, merely sending an Email to Hillary void of any classified content makes Obama 'legally culpable'. By that absurdity, Domino's would be equally 'culpable' for sending her a coupon for $5 dollar medium one topping pies.

Alas, your pseudo-legal analysis is gloriously irrelevant to the actual law or precedent. As demonstrated elegantly by the findings of both the FBI and the Inspector General.

Did Dominoes send the coupon using an alias so that nobody would know that it was them doing the sending? Did Dominoes then claim not to know that the email address they sent the coupon to even existed?

What law would have been broken in either case?

You keep making up standards of 'legal cupability' based on your imagination. Despite no evidence of *any* classified information being sent or received by Obama from or to Hillary's server, you offer us the meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish that Obama would have been legally culpable if Hillary had criminally charged.

Why? Because you imagined it must be so, that's why.

And demonstrating yet again why you vs the FBI and Inspector General on the application of the law has the same winner every time:

Not you.

When people are shown to have lied about something...it's the basis for doubting what they do from that point on. Barack Obama claimed not to know anything about Hillary Clinton conducting official business through a private server...and then it was discovered that he was sending her emails AT that private email account!

 

[Oldstyle]

We won't ever know what Obama communicated to Clinton on her private servers, Skylar because Obama invoked Executive Privilege to keep that secret.

So with zero evidence that anything that Obama sent her was 'classified', you imagine it was and then draw a nested series of pseudo-legal gibberish conclusions?

Um, no.

Obama only would have been culpable if he'd sent or received classified information. And there is no evidence that he did.

This thread is a was

[quto
We do however know that Clinton routinely communicated classified information through those two private unsecured servers hidden in her house and hid the existence of those servers from Congressional investigators looking into the Benghazi debacle.

No, we don't 'know' that. You keep mistaking your imagination for knowldge.

Out of literally tens of thousands of emails, there were a few dozen that contained classified information. And those were almost entirely forwarded to Hillary without classification markings. You're offering us a conspiracy theory backed by jack shit as your entire basis of reasoning.

Your imagination is not a standard of evidence. Nor is your baseless insinuation.

Is that literally all you've got? Bullshit claims like "they started with their conclusion before the investigation" or the "Domino's Coupon' theory of legal culpability.....and then you just abandon it and come up with brand new conspiracy batshit?

If so, that was easy.

Obama is "culpable" if he's communicating official government business with anyone in his administration through private email accounts!

Says who?

Again, you keep making these pseudo-legal assertions backed by jack shit. Assertions you have no evidence to support. By your own admission, you have no idea what was in Obama's emails.

But from that starting place of pristine ignorance, you're going to tell us that you know better than both the FBI and the Inspector General on what constitutes a legal violation for Obama?

I'm sorry.....but your delusions of legal expertise aren't evidence. They're an excuse for it.

Neither the FBI...nor the Inspector General...or myself have any idea what was in Obama's emails! He's protected himself by invoking Executive Privilege on all those communications. That doesn't however change the fact that he was indeed sending emails to an email account that he later claimed he didn't know existed...and he was sending them using an alias! That positively REEKS and you know it!

And how do you know what the FBI or the Inspector General knows?

Why, you imagine it must be so of course. Your pony's one trick: Imagination. Back in reality, you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about, as demonstrated here:

In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was shown an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, but the longtime Clinton aide did not recognize the name of the sender.

Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal

But the FBI has no idea what's in the email they're literally showing Abedin to review?

LMAO! Imagination: 0. Reality: 1.

Try again. This time with better imaginary bullshit that this JV nonsense you've been pinching off.

Huma Abedin was the one who was shocked that Obama was using an alias to communicate with Clinton and she also seemed to think the email she was shown by the FBI was classified material. We don't know what that email was however because Obama invoked Executive Privilege.

 

[Skylar]

"Obama repeatedly guaranteed the White House would not seek to influence a decision by the Justice Department or FBI about whether to prosecute Clinton if they find evidence of wrongdoing.

"I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations," Obama said. "I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it."

Sigh....remember the days?

Now we live in an era where Trump actively tries to influence investigations, demands that the AG prosecute his political enemies, and berates the AG for indicting republicans at a time that wasn't politically convenient.

This administration is rotting from the head.

Interesting...so when Obama made his statement back in April of that year, that although Clinton may have mishandled some classified materials that it wasn't a violation of law and then his FBI Director basically takes that same position later in the summer...that isn't influencing investigations?

What Obama said in April....or what you IMAGINE Obama said in April?

Obama said she was careless, but that she didn't endanger national security.

Wading into a campaign controversy, President Obama said Sunday that Hillary Clinton was careless but did not harm national security by using a nonsecure email system when she served as secretary of State.

"I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security," Obama said in an interview on "Fox News Sunday."

Obama says Hillary Clinton was careless with emails but didn't jeopardize national security

Yet in the wasteland of your imagination, you've morphed that into Obama saying she didn't violate any law.

Which Obama didn't say.

In fact, he left it to the FBI to determine if there was evidence of wrong doing.

Obama repeatedly guaranteed the White House would not seek to influence a decision by the Justice Department or FBI about whether to prosecute Clinton if they find evidence of wrongdoing.

"I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations," Obama said. "I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it."

Obama says Hillary Clinton was careless with emails but didn't jeopardize national security

Gee, Old School.....if your argument had merit, you wouldn't have had to 'reimagine' Obama's statements to match Comey's would you?

This, again, is why no one uses you as a legal authority for anything.

Gee, Skylar...you on the left call for Trump to be brought up on charges of "Obstruction of Justice" for doing EXACTLY what Barack Obama did!

Save of course that Obama didn't talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations, didn't claim that Hillary hadn't broke the law, and drew a firm line about pending investigations.

While Trump is demands pending investigations be stopped, bellittles his AG for indicting republicans, and demands the AG prosecute his political enemies. So much for 'exactly what Barack did'.

Your tell is the word 'EXACTLY' in all caps. Whenever you do that, I know you're completely full of shit.

 

[Skylar]

So with zero evidence that anything that Obama sent her was 'classified', you imagine it was and then draw a nested series of pseudo-legal gibberish conclusions?

Um, no.

Obama only would have been culpable if he'd sent or received classified information. And there is no evidence that he did.

This thread is a was

[quto
We do however know that Clinton routinely communicated classified information through those two private unsecured servers hidden in her house and hid the existence of those servers from Congressional investigators looking into the Benghazi debacle.

No, we don't 'know' that. You keep mistaking your imagination for knowldge.

Out of literally tens of thousands of emails, there were a few dozen that contained classified information. And those were almost entirely forwarded to Hillary without classification markings. You're offering us a conspiracy theory backed by jack shit as your entire basis of reasoning.

Your imagination is not a standard of evidence. Nor is your baseless insinuation.

Is that literally all you've got? Bullshit claims like "they started with their conclusion before the investigation" or the "Domino's Coupon' theory of legal culpability.....and then you just abandon it and come up with brand new conspiracy batshit?

If so, that was easy.

Obama is "culpable" if he's communicating official government business with anyone in his administration through private email accounts!

Says who?

Again, you keep making these pseudo-legal assertions backed by jack shit. Assertions you have no evidence to support. By your own admission, you have no idea what was in Obama's emails.

But from that starting place of pristine ignorance, you're going to tell us that you know better than both the FBI and the Inspector General on what constitutes a legal violation for Obama?

I'm sorry.....but your delusions of legal expertise aren't evidence. They're an excuse for it.

Neither the FBI...nor the Inspector General...or myself have any idea what was in Obama's emails! He's protected himself by invoking Executive Privilege on all those communications. That doesn't however change the fact that he was indeed sending emails to an email account that he later claimed he didn't know existed...and he was sending them using an alias! That positively REEKS and you know it!

And how do you know what the FBI or the Inspector General knows?

Why, you imagine it must be so of course. Your pony's one trick: Imagination. Back in reality, you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about, as demonstrated here:

In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was shown an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, but the longtime Clinton aide did not recognize the name of the sender.

Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal

But the FBI has no idea what's in the email they're literally showing Abedin to review?

LMAO! Imagination: 0. Reality: 1.

Try again. This time with better imaginary bullshit that this JV nonsense you've been pinching off.

Huma Abedin was the one who was shocked that Obama was using an alias to communicate with Clinton and she also seemed to think the email she was shown by the FBI was classified material. We don't know what that email was however because Obama invoked Executive Privilege.

Again, Old School....your assertion was that the FBI didn't know what was in the emails that Obama sent.

Yet in direct and laughably contradiction of your imaginary nonsense, the FBI *showed* Abedin the very emails you insist they knew nothing about. But the FBI had never read what they were showing Abedin?

What an amazing coincidence then that out of literally *tens of thousands* of emails, they just happened to show her one between Obama and Hillary.

Or......you just don't know what you're talking about.

Sigh....again.

 

[Oldstyle]

"Obama repeatedly guaranteed the White House would not seek to influence a decision by the Justice Department or FBI about whether to prosecute Clinton if they find evidence of wrongdoing.

"I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations," Obama said. "I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it."

Sigh....remember the days?

Now we live in an era where Trump actively tries to influence investigations, demands that the AG prosecute his political enemies, and berates the AG for indicting republicans at a time that wasn't politically convenient.

This administration is rotting from the head.

Interesting...so when Obama made his statement back in April of that year, that although Clinton may have mishandled some classified materials that it wasn't a violation of law and then his FBI Director basically takes that same position later in the summer...that isn't influencing investigations?

What Obama said in April....or what you IMAGINE Obama said in April?

Obama said she was careless, but that she didn't endanger national security.

Wading into a campaign controversy, President Obama said Sunday that Hillary Clinton was careless but did not harm national security by using a nonsecure email system when she served as secretary of State.

"I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security," Obama said in an interview on "Fox News Sunday."

Obama says Hillary Clinton was careless with emails but didn't jeopardize national security

Yet in the wasteland of your imagination, you've morphed that into Obama saying she didn't violate any law.

Which Obama didn't say.

In fact, he left it to the FBI to determine if there was evidence of wrong doing.

Obama repeatedly guaranteed the White House would not seek to influence a decision by the Justice Department or FBI about whether to prosecute Clinton if they find evidence of wrongdoing.

"I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations," Obama said. "I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it."

Obama says Hillary Clinton was careless with emails but didn't jeopardize national security

Gee, Old School.....if your argument had merit, you wouldn't have had to 'reimagine' Obama's statements to match Comey's would you?

This, again, is why no one uses you as a legal authority for anything.

Gee, Skylar...you on the left call for Trump to be brought up on charges of "Obstruction of Justice" for doing EXACTLY what Barack Obama did!

Save of course that Obama didn't talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations, didn't claim that Hillary hadn't broke the law, and drew a firm line about pending investigations.

While Trump is demands pending investigations be stopped, bellittles his AG for indicting republicans, and demands the AG prosecute his political enemies. So much for 'exactly what Barack did'.

Your tell is EXACTLY in all caps. Whenever you do that, I know you're completely full of shit.

Wait, you don't think that Barack Obama talked to his Attorney General about the Clinton "matter"? That's so naive it borders farce! OF COURSE HE TALKED TO LYNCH ABOUT IT! Let me guess...I bet you think that when Lynch had that meeting on the tarmac in Arizona with Bill Clinton...they talked about their grandkids?

 

[Oldstyle]

Obama is "culpable" if he's communicating official government business with anyone in his administration through private email accounts!

Says who?

Again, you keep making these pseudo-legal assertions backed by jack shit. Assertions you have no evidence to support. By your own admission, you have no idea what was in Obama's emails.

But from that starting place of pristine ignorance, you're going to tell us that you know better than both the FBI and the Inspector General on what constitutes a legal violation for Obama?

I'm sorry.....but your delusions of legal expertise aren't evidence. They're an excuse for it.

Neither the FBI...nor the Inspector General...or myself have any idea what was in Obama's emails! He's protected himself by invoking Executive Privilege on all those communications. That doesn't however change the fact that he was indeed sending emails to an email account that he later claimed he didn't know existed...and he was sending them using an alias! That positively REEKS and you know it!

And how do you know what the FBI or the Inspector General knows?

Why, you imagine it must be so of course. Your pony's one trick: Imagination. Back in reality, you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about, as demonstrated here:

In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was shown an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, but the longtime Clinton aide did not recognize the name of the sender.

Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal

But the FBI has no idea what's in the email they're literally showing Abedin to review?

LMAO! Imagination: 0. Reality: 1.

Try again. This time with better imaginary bullshit that this JV nonsense you've been pinching off.

Huma Abedin was the one who was shocked that Obama was using an alias to communicate with Clinton and she also seemed to think the email she was shown by the FBI was classified material. We don't know what that email was however because Obama invoked Executive Privilege.

Again, Old School....your assertion was that the FBI didn't know what was in the emails that Obama sent.

Yet in direct and laughably contradiction of your imaginary nonsense, the FBI *showed* Abedin the very emails you insist they knew nothing about. But the FBI had never read what they were showing Abedin?

What an amazing coincidence then that out of literally *tens of thousands* of emails, they just happened to show her one between Obama and Hillary.

Or......you just don't know what you're talking about.

Sigh....again.

My assertion is that the FBI can't use what's in the emails that Obama sent even if they do know what's in them because Barry invoked Executive Privilege! My assertion is also that Huma Abedin looked at the email they showed her...didn't know that it was from Obama until she was told it was and that he was using an alias...and then she made the comment that the email contained classified information and she was shocked that it had been sent. Kind of makes you think that Barack Obama DID communicate classified information on an unsecured email account despite his claims not to know it existed!

 

[Skylar]

"Obama repeatedly guaranteed the White House would not seek to influence a decision by the Justice Department or FBI about whether to prosecute Clinton if they find evidence of wrongdoing.

"I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations," Obama said. "I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it."

Sigh....remember the days?

Now we live in an era where Trump actively tries to influence investigations, demands that the AG prosecute his political enemies, and berates the AG for indicting republicans at a time that wasn't politically convenient.

This administration is rotting from the head.

Interesting...so when Obama made his statement back in April of that year, that although Clinton may have mishandled some classified materials that it wasn't a violation of law and then his FBI Director basically takes that same position later in the summer...that isn't influencing investigations?

What Obama said in April....or what you IMAGINE Obama said in April?

Obama said she was careless, but that she didn't endanger national security.

Wading into a campaign controversy, President Obama said Sunday that Hillary Clinton was careless but did not harm national security by using a nonsecure email system when she served as secretary of State.

"I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security," Obama said in an interview on "Fox News Sunday."

Obama says Hillary Clinton was careless with emails but didn't jeopardize national security

Yet in the wasteland of your imagination, you've morphed that into Obama saying she didn't violate any law.

Which Obama didn't say.

In fact, he left it to the FBI to determine if there was evidence of wrong doing.

Obama repeatedly guaranteed the White House would not seek to influence a decision by the Justice Department or FBI about whether to prosecute Clinton if they find evidence of wrongdoing.

"I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations," Obama said. "I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it."

Obama says Hillary Clinton was careless with emails but didn't jeopardize national security

Gee, Old School.....if your argument had merit, you wouldn't have had to 'reimagine' Obama's statements to match Comey's would you?

This, again, is why no one uses you as a legal authority for anything.

Gee, Skylar...you on the left call for Trump to be brought up on charges of "Obstruction of Justice" for doing EXACTLY what Barack Obama did!

Save of course that Obama didn't talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations, didn't claim that Hillary hadn't broke the law, and drew a firm line about pending investigations.

While Trump is demands pending investigations be stopped, bellittles his AG for indicting republicans, and demands the AG prosecute his political enemies. So much for 'exactly what Barack did'.

Your tell is EXACTLY in all caps. Whenever you do that, I know you're completely full of shit.

Wait, you don't think that Barack Obama talked to his Attorney General about the Clinton "matter"?

Laughing.....that's it? I caught you flagrantly lying about Obama's statement, literally making up quotes Obama never offered, with those fraudulent statements you invented being the literal cornerstone of your *entire* argument......

.....and you're just gonna pretend it never happened?

Oh, no.

Your entire 'Obama and Comey said the same thing' conspiracy just came crashing down. You "reimagined" Obama's statements to match Comey's. And then used your fake quote to condemn Comey's findings.

Um, that's not how reality works, Old Style.

Just like your 'they came to their conclusions before the investigation' batshit collapsed under scrutiny.

Just like your 'Obama was legally culpable' nonsense collapsed.

That's so naive it borders farce! OF COURSE HE TALKED TO LYNCH ABOUT IT! Let me guess...I bet you think that when Lynch had that meeting on the tarmac in Arizona with Bill Clinton...they talked about their grandkids?

If you have evidence that Obama tried to interfere with the investigation, show us.

I can show you tweet after tweet from Trump, raging at Sessions, demanding investigations be ended, demanding that his political enemies be investigated, publicly belittling Sessions about indicting republicans...to such a degree that the AG found it necessary to release this statement in reply:

I took control of the Department of Justice the day I was sworn in. ... The actions of the Department of Justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations."

Attorney General Jeff Sessions

And your evidence that Obama did the 'exact' same thing......is you lying about what Obama said. And your imagination.

Damn, you suck at this.

 

[Skylar]

My assertion is that the FBI can't use what's in the emails that Obama sent even if they do know what's in them because Barry invoked Executive Privilege!

You can't even quote YOU accurately. Here's what you said:

Neither the FBI...nor the Inspector General...or myself have any idea what was in Obama's emails! He's protected himself by invoking Executive Privilege on all those communications.

But you didn't know what you were talking about, did you? You literally made that nonsense up, pulled sideways out of your ass.

And when challenged, you 'reimagined' your own words. Just like you 'reimagined' Obama's statements regarding Hillary to match your argument.

You're an unreliable narrator, Old Style. If even YOU are going to treat your words like useless flotsam to be ignored and discarded....surely you'll understand why we treat them the same way.

 

[Oldstyle]

My assertion is that the FBI can't use what's in the emails that Obama sent even if they do know what's in them because Barry invoked Executive Privilege!

You can't even quote YOU accurately. Here's what you said:

Neither the FBI...nor the Inspector General...or myself have any idea what was in Obama's emails! He's protected himself by invoking Executive Privilege on all those communications.

But you didn't know what you were talking about, did you? You literally made that nonsense up, pulled sideways out of your ass.

And when challenged, you 'reimagined' your own words. Just like you 'reimagined' Obama's statements regarding Hillary to match your argument.

You're an unreliable narrator, Old Style. If even YOU are going to treat your words like useless flotsam to be ignored and discarded....surely you'll understand why we treat them the same way.

Oh, it's "nonsense" that Barack Obama invoked Executive Privilege to hide what he and Hillary Clinton discussed using the private email account that he said he didn't know anything about...a private email account that he accessed by using an alias? It's "nonsense" that when the FBI showed Huma Abedin one of the emails that Obama sent she was shocked that he had used an alias and that he'd sent an email to Clinton that was classified?

How's my "narration" on that?

I'm not pulling anything out of my ass, Skylar! There is a stink surrounding this however and it stinks of cover up! The Obama White House was doing all kinds of things off the record using private emails and aliases to hide what they were up to. This from the people who pompously declared that THEY would be the most transparent administration in history! You of course think this is all a product of my "imagination"! Quite frankly I couldn't come up with something as sleazy as what was going on in this White House! It goes so much further than anything Richard Nixon ever did...it's not even a contest!

 

[Skylar]

My assertion is that the FBI can't use what's in the emails that Obama sent even if they do know what's in them because Barry invoked Executive Privilege!

You can't even quote YOU accurately. Here's what you said:

Neither the FBI...nor the Inspector General...or myself have any idea what was in Obama's emails! He's protected himself by invoking Executive Privilege on all those communications.

But you didn't know what you were talking about, did you? You literally made that nonsense up, pulled sideways out of your ass.

And when challenged, you 'reimagined' your own words. Just like you 'reimagined' Obama's statements regarding Hillary to match your argument.

You're an unreliable narrator, Old Style. If even YOU are going to treat your words like useless flotsam to be ignored and discarded....surely you'll understand why we treat them the same way.

Oh, it's "nonsense" that Barack Obama invoked Executive Privilege to hide what he and Hillary Clinton discussed using the private email account that he said he didn't know anything about...a private email account that he accessed by using an alias?

Its nonsense that Obama said that Hillary didn't break any law. He didn't. And you knew he didn't. You lied to back a batshit conspiracy theory that's completely collapsed.

Its nonsense that Obama said that Hillary 'didn't intend' to endanger national security. He never made any 'intention' arguments. Comey did. You invented yet another fake Obama quote to try and make Obama's statements sound more like Comey's.

Its nonsense that Obama and Comey said the exact same thing about Hillary. They didn't. They had different basis for their claims, focused on completely different things (danger to national security with Obama v. intention and precedent with Comey). The only similarity in their claims was the word 'careless'.

Its nonsense that the FBI 'started with a conclusion before the investigation'. They didn't. The FBI didn't write their draft until 10 months into a 12 month investigation when all the evidence they had pointed in the same direction; No criminal charges.

Its nonsense that the FBI didn't know what was in those emails Obama sent. They did. The FBI showed them to Huma Abedin. And demonstrating that you just don't know what you're talking about.

Its nonsense that Obama would be legally culpable if Hillary was charged with crimes related to her email server. There's zero evidence anything Obama sent had any classified information in it. You literally offered us your imagination...until I called you on it.

Its nonsense that Obama and Trump did the exact same thing with investigations. Obama never discussed the ongoing investigation with the FBI chief and drew a firm line between himself and investigation. While Trump has publicly tried to shut down investigations, demanded the AG investigate his political enemies and has belittled the AG for indicting republicans.

Its nonsense to offer us imagination as the basis of your argument, backed by jackshit. As demonstrated by your fake quotes, your fake assertions about what the FBI knew and your ludicrious assertions that Obama and Trump did the 'exact same thing'.

With you misquoting YOURSELF when the evidence demonstrated that you simply didn't know what you're talking about.

Your word is shit now, Old Style. As you've caught lying, making up imaginary quotes, misrepresenting actual quotes, inventing pseudo-legal nonsense with no basis in the law, offering fraudulent time lines and even misquoting yourself to try and salvage absolute nonsense arguments.

If your arguments had merit, you wouldn't have had to do any of that.