Study: Higher risk for heart inflammation in vaxxed children

[JB70]

Study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866v1.full.pdf

"The main finding of this study was the cardiac adverse event (CAE) rates of 162/million and
94/million post- Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccination dose two for the 12-15- and 16–17-
year-old boys, respectively. Approximately 86% of these resulted in hospitalization for both age
groups."

 

[RodISHI]

Disgusting POS continuing on knowing darn well that they are destroying healthy adults and children.

 

[Votto]

Conclusions: Post-vaccination CAE rate was highest in young boys aged 12-15 following dose two. For boys 12-17 without medical comorbidities, the likelihood of post vaccination dose two CAE is 162.2 and 94.0/million respectively. This incidence exceeds their expected 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization rate at both moderate (August 21, 2021 rates) and high COVID-19 hospitalization incidence.

 

[evenflow1969]

Study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866v1.full.pdf

"The main finding of this study was the cardiac adverse event (CAE) rates of 162/million and
94/million post- Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccination dose two for the 12-15- and 16–17-
year-old boys, respectively. Approximately 86% of these resulted in hospitalization for both age
groups."

Ya your link goes no where.

 

[RodISHI]

Ya your link goes no where.

It opened right up for me.

 

[Vrenn]

Study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866v1.full.pdf

"The main finding of this study was the cardiac adverse event (CAE) rates of 162/million and
94/million post- Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccination dose two for the 12-15- and 16–17-
year-old boys, respectively. Approximately 86% of these resulted in hospitalization for both age
groups."

Are medRxiv preprints certified by peer review?​ Manuscripts submitted to medRxiv are not certified by peer review, edited, or typeset before being posted online. Are submissions to medRxiv scrutinized before posting?​ All manuscripts are screened on submission for plagiarism, non-scientific content, inappropriate article types, and material that could potentially endanger the health of individual patients or the public. The latter may include, but is not limited to, studies describing dual-use research and work that challenges or could compromise accepted public health measures and advice regarding infectious disease transmission, immunization, and therapy.

Translation: It's about as scientific as the 'Big Lie'

 

[JB70]

Are medRxiv preprints certified by peer review?​ Manuscripts submitted to medRxiv are not certified by peer review, edited, or typeset before being posted online. Are submissions to medRxiv scrutinized before posting?​ All manuscripts are screened on submission for plagiarism, non-scientific content, inappropriate article types, and material that could potentially endanger the health of individual patients or the public. The latter may include, but is not limited to, studies describing dual-use research and work that challenges or could compromise accepted public health measures and advice regarding infectious disease transmission, immunization, and therapy.

Translation: It's about as scientific as the 'Big Lie'

So you actually believe it is a good idea for children to take this shot? No long term studies as far as i know.
Major problems with ADE in earlier Coronavaxx.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Division 1 Athlete’s Future Uncertain After Serious Jab Side Effects – “No one should be forced to take something that causes what happened to me” – IOTW Report

 

[Vrenn]

So you actually believe it is a good idea for children to take this shot? No long term studies as far as i know.
Major problems with ADE in earlier Coronavaxx.

How about medium studies like children dying, spreading Covid, allowing new strains Newsflash, Delta is the 4th letter in the
Greek Language meaning it's the fourth strain). We have another chance to get a handle on this thing but maybe the next strain won't allow our vaccine to combat it.