Study shows hydroxychloroquine and zinc treatments increased coronavirus survival rate by almost three times

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
92,309
63,250
2,605
Right coast, classified
And when did they figure this out you ask?

Saint Barnabas Medical Center is a 557-bed, teaching medical center in Livingston, New Jersey. Using the hospital’s discharge coding data, we identified 255 Covid patients, who were admitted by May 1, 2020 and required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Ethical approval for the study was granted by the hospital’s Institutional Review Board.

How convenient.
 
And when did they figure this out you ask?

Saint Barnabas Medical Center is a 557-bed, teaching medical center in Livingston, New Jersey. Using the hospital’s discharge coding data, we identified 255 Covid patients, who were admitted by May 1, 2020 and required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Ethical approval for the study was granted by the hospital’s Institutional Review Board.

How convenient.

Fauci, the DemoKKKrats, and the corporate media colluded to discredit this treatment, and their actions probably killed tens of thousands of people who could have been saved.

The left has so much blood on their hands.
 
Show us a study of zinc or z-pack treatment alone! Because hydroxychloroquine alone is useless, but vitamins B, C & Zinc worked wonders.

Trump took hydroxychloroquine, then caught covid, then hospitalized.

Herman Cain took hydroxychloroquine and died of covid.
 
Last edited:
My doctor and I both believe I had Covid in the spring of 2019, before anyone heard of it. Identical symptoms, though mostly mild save for fatigue. Gave me a Z-Pack, which cleared it right up.
 
The link clearly states that the study was not peer reviewed or evaluated. Still it focused on those who were on ventilation. 201 people died and 54 survived who were included in this survey of 255. 7 people of the survived were actually transferred to another facility so they do not know if they lived or died. Still these test subject had serious medical problems still died. 146 were over 60 and died. They divided the test group by age with over 60 or under 60 . Over a 75% of over 60 died. Whereas under 25 percent under 30 died.

Also a lot of patients also received multiple treatment options.

244 of the patients received Hydroxychloroquine

Still using modeling they concluded

“Treatment” increases the absolute chances of survival by 22.5% [95% C.I. = 7.6 % – 37.5%; p = 0.003]. In other words, for the untreated group, survival was 16.5%

Still this was a study to determine more of the treatment produced better results.

79% still died, yeah they were critically ill patients.
still this just confirmed that age was a major factor but not a certainty that age had a lot to do with survival of COVID.

Conclusions: This study extends the understanding of outcomes in Covid patients , who require IMV. Only 3.5% of the Cohort “walked out of the hospital”
 
And when did they figure this out you ask?

Saint Barnabas Medical Center is a 557-bed, teaching medical center in Livingston, New Jersey. Using the hospital’s discharge coding data, we identified 255 Covid patients, who were admitted by May 1, 2020 and required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Ethical approval for the study was granted by the hospital’s Institutional Review Board.

How convenient.
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
 
#4: On another thread, we are linking hydroxychloroquine to a bat from Uganda, the country that contains Zika Forest. We next will link it to coronaviruses.
 
Thanks, Penelope. At the very least, OP’s report should be compared with the funky parameters that were set up for the Recovery Trial, especially dose, and in addition, the elimination of (azithromycin [italics]), from the treatment, which is suspect.
 

Forum List

Back
Top