Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, Assange didn't say that. Assange said "Our source is not a state party. So the answer -- for our interactions -- is no," and "Our source is not the Russian government. It is not state parties."
Julian Assange: Russia didn't give emails to WikiLeaks - CNNPolitics.com
What does he mean by this? What is "the source", the person who did the hacking? Or the person who gave it to wikileaks? This is sooooo vague it's ridiculous. Also, a guy the right wanted in prison a few months ago, now all of a sudden everything he says needs to be taken as if a 5 year old who would never lie said it.
The left is pissed because it attacked them. The right were pissed when it attacked them. Is it funny to see Palin apologize to a guy she wanted in prison? Yes it is, it shows just how much bullshit this nonsense partisan politics is.
However you're being told what you want to hear, and you're parroting what you want to hear.
Saying something in such a manner that is vague isn't so hard, but it fools those who want to be fooled. Putin has a history of this. Like the airliner that got shot down. Russia never said it did it, it always put doubt into the minds of people.
Being told what I want to hear from whom? I want all corruption revealed and brought to light..... I don't give a shit how it happens. See? That is just one of the differences between me and you...you have a bias and I don't. If there is dirt on Trump? Bring it on....I want dirt brought to light about the neocons....cockroaches flee the light and scurry away. There are a lot of parasitic cockroaches that have been feeding off of us........shine that fucking light. I already know all of this stuff but very few here want to learn it from, me....they would rather eat lead paint chips than admit that I am right.
The funny thing is you're basically throwing shit at me, and pretending you know me, and then acting like you're squeaky clean. It's all rather ridiculous.
You got told, by the media reporting on what Assange said, that it wasn't the Russians. Does this mean it wasn't the Russians?
You're not biased? Yet you used "Libtards", I mean, grow up firstly, secondly, who the fuck isn't biased and uses the term "libtard"?
So stop pretending to be whiter than white.No, Assange didn't say that. Assange said "Our source is not a state party. So the answer -- for our interactions -- is no," and "Our source is not the Russian government. It is not state parties."
Julian Assange: Russia didn't give emails to WikiLeaks - CNNPolitics.com
What does he mean by this? What is "the source", the person who did the hacking? Or the person who gave it to wikileaks? This is sooooo vague it's ridiculous. Also, a guy the right wanted in prison a few months ago, now all of a sudden everything he says needs to be taken as if a 5 year old who would never lie said it.
The left is pissed because it attacked them. The right were pissed when it attacked them. Is it funny to see Palin apologize to a guy she wanted in prison? Yes it is, it shows just how much bullshit this nonsense partisan politics is.
However you're being told what you want to hear, and you're parroting what you want to hear.
Saying something in such a manner that is vague isn't so hard, but it fools those who want to be fooled. Putin has a history of this. Like the airliner that got shot down. Russia never said it did it, it always put doubt into the minds of people.
Being told what I want to hear from whom? I want all corruption revealed and brought to light..... I don't give a shit how it happens. See? That is just one of the differences between me and you...you have a bias and I don't. If there is dirt on Trump? Bring it on....I want dirt brought to light about the neocons....cockroaches flee the light and scurry away. There are a lot of parasitic cockroaches that have been feeding off of us........shine that fucking light. I already know all of this stuff but very few here want to learn it from, me....they would rather eat lead paint chips than admit that I am right.
The funny thing is you're basically throwing shit at me, and pretending you know me, and then acting like you're squeaky clean. It's all rather ridiculous.
You got told, by the media reporting on what Assange said, that it wasn't the Russians. Does this mean it wasn't the Russians?
You're not biased? Yet you used "Libtards", I mean, grow up firstly, secondly, who the fuck isn't biased and uses the term "libtard"?
So stop pretending to be whiter than white.
Like the movie "Jerry Maguire"??? "Show me the money"........or in this case, show me the fucking irrefutable proof that Putin was behind the hacking of the DNC operatives showing how they were going to steal the election.......can't be done. Were the Russians funding Project Veritas as well? BTW, I have been very up frpnt about how much I despise the Fabian socilaist left and their Trotsky-ites partners that are the neocons. If you want to claim I am biased? That will not cause me to lose any sleep...if you think that I was trying to convict you by putting you in a category? If those shoes fit? Put them motherfuckers on and wear them with pride....socks are optional. You are more aware than most but that leftardism you cling to shines through inspite of your best intentions. I want the truth........don't sell me pretty lies in a pretty package because YOU believe that the ugly truth is too much for me to handle.........let it ALL hang out. It's simply a fact that the leftard clown posse was exposed.......bring on neocon dirty laundry.........makes no matter to me.
"irrefutable proof"? You can't even prove that we as human exist and that we're not a computer program. Nothing is ever "irrefutable proof" is it? But I guess it helps you to play the game that people have to prove beyond any possible chance (when much of the information is still being kept secret).
Then again I've not said the Russians did this.
What I have said is that a lot of things point to the Russians doing this, and the way the Russians have acted in other areas would lead me to think it is more likely that the Russians did something than not.
I don't intend for you to lose sleep. I just wish to have this debate on realistic playing field. I can be biased, and certainly I see bias in what you're saying. Bias isn't always a bad thing, but there's bias and there's partisan bullshit bias when everything starts getting aggressive and angry because it's nonsense. So, I do hope you try and keep away from that, refrain from insulting and then maybe we can have a good debate, because I am open to things. But using terms like "leftrdism" turns me off, it makes me thing I'm debating with a 13 year old. So, I leave that information in your hands to do as you wish, and if you continue with it, then we don't get a debate.
Fair enough.......and I am even willing to play devil's advocate and say what if Russian operatives were involved in leaking damning evidence showing that e-mails prove that the DNC elites and the lamestream media was working to usurp the election....does that make the e-mail revelations any less damning??? What has Russia done to hack off USA.INC since the fall of the Berlin Wall? They allowed Crimea to cast their lot with them instead of the E.U after the illegal coup de'etat of the duly elected government of the Ukraine sponsored by George Soros? Or the fact that Russia and Syria allied themsselves and agreed to a partnership for a pipeline that threatens the relevancy of the petro fiat currency dollar? This shit is worth risking WWIII over? I am simply struggling with how the left is willing to reconcile with becoming warmongers because they need a scapegoat over Hillary's loss and how Putin has played the Barrypuppet for a fool by out-maneuvering him at every turn........is it worth risking mutually assured destruction?????
Being told what I want to hear from whom? I want all corruption revealed and brought to light..... I don't give a shit how it happens. See? That is just one of the differences between me and you...you have a bias and I don't. If there is dirt on Trump? Bring it on....I want dirt brought to light about the neocons....cockroaches flee the light and scurry away. There are a lot of parasitic cockroaches that have been feeding off of us........shine that fucking light. I already know all of this stuff but very few here want to learn it from, me....they would rather eat lead paint chips than admit that I am right.
The funny thing is you're basically throwing shit at me, and pretending you know me, and then acting like you're squeaky clean. It's all rather ridiculous.
You got told, by the media reporting on what Assange said, that it wasn't the Russians. Does this mean it wasn't the Russians?
You're not biased? Yet you used "Libtards", I mean, grow up firstly, secondly, who the fuck isn't biased and uses the term "libtard"?
So stop pretending to be whiter than white.Being told what I want to hear from whom? I want all corruption revealed and brought to light..... I don't give a shit how it happens. See? That is just one of the differences between me and you...you have a bias and I don't. If there is dirt on Trump? Bring it on....I want dirt brought to light about the neocons....cockroaches flee the light and scurry away. There are a lot of parasitic cockroaches that have been feeding off of us........shine that fucking light. I already know all of this stuff but very few here want to learn it from, me....they would rather eat lead paint chips than admit that I am right.
The funny thing is you're basically throwing shit at me, and pretending you know me, and then acting like you're squeaky clean. It's all rather ridiculous.
You got told, by the media reporting on what Assange said, that it wasn't the Russians. Does this mean it wasn't the Russians?
You're not biased? Yet you used "Libtards", I mean, grow up firstly, secondly, who the fuck isn't biased and uses the term "libtard"?
So stop pretending to be whiter than white.
Like the movie "Jerry Maguire"??? "Show me the money"........or in this case, show me the fucking irrefutable proof that Putin was behind the hacking of the DNC operatives showing how they were going to steal the election.......can't be done. Were the Russians funding Project Veritas as well? BTW, I have been very up frpnt about how much I despise the Fabian socilaist left and their Trotsky-ites partners that are the neocons. If you want to claim I am biased? That will not cause me to lose any sleep...if you think that I was trying to convict you by putting you in a category? If those shoes fit? Put them motherfuckers on and wear them with pride....socks are optional. You are more aware than most but that leftardism you cling to shines through inspite of your best intentions. I want the truth........don't sell me pretty lies in a pretty package because YOU believe that the ugly truth is too much for me to handle.........let it ALL hang out. It's simply a fact that the leftard clown posse was exposed.......bring on neocon dirty laundry.........makes no matter to me.
"irrefutable proof"? You can't even prove that we as human exist and that we're not a computer program. Nothing is ever "irrefutable proof" is it? But I guess it helps you to play the game that people have to prove beyond any possible chance (when much of the information is still being kept secret).
Then again I've not said the Russians did this.
What I have said is that a lot of things point to the Russians doing this, and the way the Russians have acted in other areas would lead me to think it is more likely that the Russians did something than not.
I don't intend for you to lose sleep. I just wish to have this debate on realistic playing field. I can be biased, and certainly I see bias in what you're saying. Bias isn't always a bad thing, but there's bias and there's partisan bullshit bias when everything starts getting aggressive and angry because it's nonsense. So, I do hope you try and keep away from that, refrain from insulting and then maybe we can have a good debate, because I am open to things. But using terms like "leftrdism" turns me off, it makes me thing I'm debating with a 13 year old. So, I leave that information in your hands to do as you wish, and if you continue with it, then we don't get a debate.
Fair enough.......and I am even willing to play devil's advocate and say what if Russian operatives were involved in leaking damning evidence showing that e-mails prove that the DNC elites and the lamestream media was working to usurp the election....does that make the e-mail revelations any less damning??? What has Russia done to hack off USA.INC since the fall of the Berlin Wall? They allowed Crimea to cast their lot with them instead of the E.U after the illegal coup de'etat of the duly elected government of the Ukraine sponsored by George Soros? Or the fact that Russia and Syria allied themsselves and agreed to a partnership for a pipeline that threatens the relevancy of the petro fiat currency dollar? This shit is worth risking WWIII over? I am simply struggling with how the left is willing to reconcile with becoming warmongers because they need a scapegoat over Hillary's loss and how Putin has played the Barrypuppet for a fool by out-maneuvering him at every turn........is it worth risking mutually assured destruction?????
No, it doesn't make the revelations any less damning, but some seem to think Russia interfering in US elections to be worse.
The left and the right aren't much different. You can find contradictions all over the place, this is partisan politics of the worst kind.
But then again you're still insulting people.
Since it is impossible to demonstrate that any of the Wikileaks emails could have influenced the election, it doesn't matter. We hack their high profile political figures and they hack our's all the time, so it just isn't even newsworthy unless it can be demonstrated that these emails could have influenced the election.They didn't hack! Oh wait! If they hacked, it's not important!The Chinese hacked the US. government and Obama said nothing...........................None of this has any meaning, as Trump is still the President and Billary is still a loser.
We have never hacked into foreign political databases to sway an election to anyone. This is what the Uproar is all about.
Wikileaks founder (Julian Grange) is probably the most wanted man in the world right now, and the efforts to find him have probably quadrupled. He is no friend of anyone's, and has leaked sensitive information that puts our soldiers in danger. The ONLY one that has praised him is Donald Trump.
Donald Trump praises Wikileaks' Julian Assange, bashes DNC and media in Twitter tirade
It doesn't matter if they did any damage, if they find collusion with anyone with the Trump campaign or anyone he is associated with, it will be considered TREASON against the United States. And they may already have something.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/world/europe/trump-campaign-russia.html?_r=0
Right now you have investigative reporters working 24 hours a day, 7 days a week trying to win the Pulitzer Prize to find that collusion.
This is a thousand times worse than Watergate, that only involved a break in at one DNC location. It's not going to go away.
If the shoe was on the other foot, you know the pseudocons would be eating their own hair in their outrage.
I'm sure if Russia hacked the RNC and Trump's campaign, we would have been exposed to no end of dirt and filth.
And then the Democrats would be saying, "Well, if Trump and the GOP weren't so fucking corrupt, Trump wouldn't have lost! Russia did us all a favor."
Russia was SELECTIVE in which side's filth and dirt they decided to expose. They SELECTED Vladimir Trump as their boy. Because they know Trump is an idiot and will do Putin's bidding.
This selectivity never occurs to the Chumps. They act as if the GOP and Trump's campaign were as pure as the driven snow.
The funny thing is you're basically throwing shit at me, and pretending you know me, and then acting like you're squeaky clean. It's all rather ridiculous.
You got told, by the media reporting on what Assange said, that it wasn't the Russians. Does this mean it wasn't the Russians?
You're not biased? Yet you used "Libtards", I mean, grow up firstly, secondly, who the fuck isn't biased and uses the term "libtard"?
So stop pretending to be whiter than white.The funny thing is you're basically throwing shit at me, and pretending you know me, and then acting like you're squeaky clean. It's all rather ridiculous.
You got told, by the media reporting on what Assange said, that it wasn't the Russians. Does this mean it wasn't the Russians?
You're not biased? Yet you used "Libtards", I mean, grow up firstly, secondly, who the fuck isn't biased and uses the term "libtard"?
So stop pretending to be whiter than white.
Like the movie "Jerry Maguire"??? "Show me the money"........or in this case, show me the fucking irrefutable proof that Putin was behind the hacking of the DNC operatives showing how they were going to steal the election.......can't be done. Were the Russians funding Project Veritas as well? BTW, I have been very up frpnt about how much I despise the Fabian socilaist left and their Trotsky-ites partners that are the neocons. If you want to claim I am biased? That will not cause me to lose any sleep...if you think that I was trying to convict you by putting you in a category? If those shoes fit? Put them motherfuckers on and wear them with pride....socks are optional. You are more aware than most but that leftardism you cling to shines through inspite of your best intentions. I want the truth........don't sell me pretty lies in a pretty package because YOU believe that the ugly truth is too much for me to handle.........let it ALL hang out. It's simply a fact that the leftard clown posse was exposed.......bring on neocon dirty laundry.........makes no matter to me.
"irrefutable proof"? You can't even prove that we as human exist and that we're not a computer program. Nothing is ever "irrefutable proof" is it? But I guess it helps you to play the game that people have to prove beyond any possible chance (when much of the information is still being kept secret).
Then again I've not said the Russians did this.
What I have said is that a lot of things point to the Russians doing this, and the way the Russians have acted in other areas would lead me to think it is more likely that the Russians did something than not.
I don't intend for you to lose sleep. I just wish to have this debate on realistic playing field. I can be biased, and certainly I see bias in what you're saying. Bias isn't always a bad thing, but there's bias and there's partisan bullshit bias when everything starts getting aggressive and angry because it's nonsense. So, I do hope you try and keep away from that, refrain from insulting and then maybe we can have a good debate, because I am open to things. But using terms like "leftrdism" turns me off, it makes me thing I'm debating with a 13 year old. So, I leave that information in your hands to do as you wish, and if you continue with it, then we don't get a debate.
Fair enough.......and I am even willing to play devil's advocate and say what if Russian operatives were involved in leaking damning evidence showing that e-mails prove that the DNC elites and the lamestream media was working to usurp the election....does that make the e-mail revelations any less damning??? What has Russia done to hack off USA.INC since the fall of the Berlin Wall? They allowed Crimea to cast their lot with them instead of the E.U after the illegal coup de'etat of the duly elected government of the Ukraine sponsored by George Soros? Or the fact that Russia and Syria allied themsselves and agreed to a partnership for a pipeline that threatens the relevancy of the petro fiat currency dollar? This shit is worth risking WWIII over? I am simply struggling with how the left is willing to reconcile with becoming warmongers because they need a scapegoat over Hillary's loss and how Putin has played the Barrypuppet for a fool by out-maneuvering him at every turn........is it worth risking mutually assured destruction?????
No, it doesn't make the revelations any less damning, but some seem to think Russia interfering in US elections to be worse.
The left and the right aren't much different. You can find contradictions all over the place, this is partisan politics of the worst kind.
But then again you're still insulting people.
Dude, I have my reasons for the insults...if it offends your sense of decorum? What can I say....like I said, you are one of those that are "awake" but I am very justified for hating the fabian socialist left.....seriously, it is a hatred that burns inside of me. I have tried to understand them and where they are coming from but they are nothing but purse-swinging morons that suffer from arrested development. I have no respect for for Bush supporting idiots either. I will admit, since I have put in the time to understand how things really work? I have become a bit of a "cyber-snob" and my tolerance for stupidity and ignorance seems to get lower by the day. I get so fucking tired of seeing people from both sides defend "their team" as if they were in some athletic competition living vicariously through the "victories" of their team even if it's at the detriment of us all. The NDAA of 2017 was passed on through with a neocon controlled house and senate......they put in a revision that puts "da gubermint" in charge of declaring what is news and what isn't.......kinda like the Pravda of the old USSR?????
And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
What is really disturbing is that under Obama the intelligence agencies have become involved in our politics. Now that they have skin in the game, how can they be trusted to be objective about Russia?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
Yep, the stupidity knows no bounds. I waited until the reports to make a decision. Now I believe that Russia was involved in the hacking or the dispersal of info. It doesn't make the info less valid but the fact the Russians are in the politics of this country is disturbing.
lmfao @ the coward... You're a joke.. Besides, you're pushing a false narrative. Where are your threads on Hillary's Russian Uranium? Obama's influence in Israeli elections, BREXIT, Egypt?? I'm sorry.. I DON'T HEAR YOU?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
Please use hollow points when requiredlmfao @ the coward... You're a joke.. Besides, you're pushing a false narrative. Where are your threads on Hillary's Russian Uranium? Obama's influence in Israeli elections, BREXIT, Egypt?? I'm sorry.. I DON'T HEAR YOU?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
No political candidate in history has committed more crime than anyone named ClintonYou gotta love it when RWnuts say crimes mean nothing.
No political candidate in history has committed more crime than anyone named ClintonYou gotta love it when RWnuts say crimes mean nothing.
lmfao @ the coward... You're a joke.. Besides, you're pushing a false narrative. Where are your threads on Hillary's Russian Uranium? Obama's influence in Israeli elections, BREXIT, Egypt?? I'm sorry.. I DON'T HEAR YOU?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
No mass shooter that was killed in a shootout after killing people in that shootout has ever been convicted, this does not mean they were not guilty. Give up kid, you are a loser, two time at leastNo political candidate in history has committed more crime than anyone named ClintonYou gotta love it when RWnuts say crimes mean nothing.
Neither Clinton was ever convicted of a crime.
He is not defending the criminal Clinton foundationlmfao @ the coward... You're a joke.. Besides, you're pushing a false narrative. Where are your threads on Hillary's Russian Uranium? Obama's influence in Israeli elections, BREXIT, Egypt?? I'm sorry.. I DON'T HEAR YOU?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
You're defending a criminal enterprise whose intent was to alter the US election in Donald Trump's favor,
and voila,
Trump wins.
You're so emotional that you didn't notice I referred to "partisans". Most people would recognize that means both sides.lmfao @ the coward... You're a joke.. Besides, you're pushing a false narrative. Where are your threads on Hillary's Russian Uranium? Obama's influence in Israeli elections, BREXIT, Egypt?? I'm sorry.. I DON'T HEAR YOU?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
It must be amazing to be you.. "Neutral" like Switzerland.. Land of Cowards and Muslims who rape and terrorize women now.. I'm passionate, dickweed... there's a difference between passionate and emotional but you're too much of a yellow bellied coward to understand anything but appeasement.. Good on you Neville,You're so emotional that you didn't notice I referred to "partisans". Most people would recognize that means both sides.lmfao @ the coward... You're a joke.. Besides, you're pushing a false narrative. Where are your threads on Hillary's Russian Uranium? Obama's influence in Israeli elections, BREXIT, Egypt?? I'm sorry.. I DON'T HEAR YOU?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
It really is amazing how similar the behaviors of both ends can be. And you both get so emotional.
.
I'm not neutral, I'm just honest.It must be amazing to be you.. "Neutral" like Switzerland.. Land of Cowards and Muslims who rape and terrorize women now.. I'm passionate, dickweed... there's a difference between passionate and emotional but you're too much of a yellow bellied coward to understand anything but appeasement.. Good on you Neville,You're so emotional that you didn't notice I referred to "partisans". Most people would recognize that means both sides.lmfao @ the coward... You're a joke.. Besides, you're pushing a false narrative. Where are your threads on Hillary's Russian Uranium? Obama's influence in Israeli elections, BREXIT, Egypt?? I'm sorry.. I DON'T HEAR YOU?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
It really is amazing how similar the behaviors of both ends can be. And you both get so emotional.
.
I'm not neutral, I'm just honest.It must be amazing to be you.. "Neutral" like Switzerland.. Land of Cowards and Muslims who rape and terrorize women now.. I'm passionate, dickweed... there's a difference between passionate and emotional but you're too much of a yellow bellied coward to understand anything but appeasement.. Good on you Neville,You're so emotional that you didn't notice I referred to "partisans". Most people would recognize that means both sides.lmfao @ the coward... You're a joke.. Besides, you're pushing a false narrative. Where are your threads on Hillary's Russian Uranium? Obama's influence in Israeli elections, BREXIT, Egypt?? I'm sorry.. I DON'T HEAR YOU?And, bingo.I agree, both sides have the blinders on and if the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be ignoring it. They would act like Clinton's campaign would be as pure as the driven snow. They already dismiss the fact that rigging the primaries was okay, the only issues is they got caught.
But for the GOP not to be concerned about outside influences into our elections is also alarming. Such is partisan politics.
I never would have thought I'd see people essentially trusting Putin and Assange over America's intelligence community.
I realize partisans often have to stretch to protect their "side", but this one is reaching "over the top" status pretty quickly.
.
It really is amazing how similar the behaviors of both ends can be. And you both get so emotional.
.
And uncontrolled emotion clouds thought processes.
.
