Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suuuuure he wasTrump made that comment in 2016, he was tongue in cheek mocking the idiots on the left that were clutching their pearls over the joke...
You've already proven you will not accept the sworn testimony of Republicans if it is at all revealing as to the illegal plot trump engaged in to overturn the election Biden won. No need to belabor the point.You expect anyone with a brain to believe anything that came out of that produced clown show?….![]()
![]()
![]()
It must suck knowing you have no say, and your opinion is meaningless, Canuck.
If We Had Had Some Backbone, We Wouldn't Have Been Stabbed in the BackMine? No. See I was too young for the draft. But my sisters friends weren’t….Back then I would have railed against it, especially for something as weak as the premise of VN…
RichKid ReichThe deep state is a fiction used as a bogeyman to animate the rubes against government.
Typical Evasion from Diploma Dumbos. Even Your Reply Is Low-IQ Grammar.If you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation why don't you take a nap.
Typical contempt for your bettersTypical Evasion from Diploma Dumbos
The I in CIA Stands Only for EgoThe fact that you believe the guy who accepted material illegally hacked by Russia so he could do their bidding by sabotaging the Clinton campaign, rather than our intel agencies who forensically proved Russia gave Wikileaks the material, speaks volumes.
You've already proven you will not accept the sworn testimony of Republicans if it is at all revealing as to the illegal plot trump engaged in to overturn the election Biden won. No need to belabor the point.
To Atone for Stalin's Holodomor, Putin Saved America from a HilladomorWASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. intelligence agencies obtained what they considered to be conclusive evidence after the November election that Russia provided hacked material from the Democratic National Committee to WikiLeaks through a third party, three U.S. officials said on Wednesday.
U.S. officials had concluded months earlier that Russian intelligence agencies had directed the hacking, but had been less certain that they could prove Russia also had controlled the release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
I can't help wondering if you, like trump, take Putin's word about Russian interference in our elections?
What's Hillary's emails were "damning" as liberals like to say, and Trump's revealed a big fat nothing burger, for 1K Alex.Media reaction to Trump campaign email leak starkly different from 2016, when Clinton was hacked
Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung reminded the press of their duty to fairness and democracy. “Any media or news outlet reprinting documents or internal communications are doing the bidding of America’s enemies and doing exactly what they want.”
![]()
Media reaction to Trump campaign email leak starkly different from 2016, when Clinton was hacked
When emails from Hillary Clinton's campaign were leaked in 2016, the press covered the issue breathlessly. But when Donald Trump's campaign was hacked and emails leaked to the press, the media held back. Why?www.latimes.com
Hypocrisy continues to be a feature of trumpery.
But Trump sang a different tune in July 2016, when during a news conference the presidential hopeful directly appealed to Russia to hack Clinton’s emails.
The entity Cheung's reference to doing the bidding of America’s enemies was of course Russia. Back then trump was soliciting Putin's help with the campaign. Soliciting and welcoming the help of one of America's enemies. Arguably an act of treachery if not treason for which he paid no political price. Such is the nature of the unconditional devotion of The Following.
As the article points out, there's another form of hypocrisy going on here. The media's. For all the whining complaints about media bias from Repubs, the overly sensationalized coverage of the Wikileaks document dumps unquestionably hurt Clinton's chances for election.
Here's How Many Bernie Sanders Supporters Ultimately Voted For Trump
![]()
Here's How Many Bernie Sanders Supporters Ultimately Voted For Trump
Yes, Bernie Sanders supporters who voted for President Trump could have cost Hillary Clinton the election. But then, about the same share of Republican primary voters defected to Clinton.www.npr.org
As difficult if not impossible as it is to quantify the magnitude of the affect Russia's activities had in support of trump's election this is one concrete way to do so.
Our "Bedrock" Is Quicksand in a SwampWhy does he constantly attack our bedrock institutions?
How were they damning? Wha?What's Hillary's emails were "damning" as liberals like to say, and Trump's revealed a big fat nothing burger, for 1K Alex.
Clearly you are free to create any kind of reality for yourself you choose. I choose not to make blanket statements, generalizations, and false equivalences about members of the two major parties. When I hear testimony like Bowers' I weigh it against the testimony of others and decide whether I believe it's credible. Perhaps you'd rather turn away because his testimony isn't to your liking.I wouldn't accept the sworn testimony of anyone from either party. They are never going to get held accountable for lying.
If You Have Nothing of Substance to Add to the Conversation, Why Don't You Take a Nap?BTW, it's not "your triggered," it's "you're triggered."
Clearly you are free to create any kind of reality for yourself you choose. I choose not to make blanket statements, generalizations, and false equivalences about members of the two major parties. When I hear testimony like Bowers' I weigh it against the testimony of others and decide whether I believe it's credible. Perhaps you'd rather turn away because his testimony isn't to your liking.
"clearly" I love it when people say that.Clearly you are free to create any kind of reality for yourself you choose. I choose not to make blanket statements, generalizations, and false equivalences about members of the two major parties. When I hear testimony like Bowers' I weigh it against the testimony of others and decide whether I believe it's credible. Perhaps you'd rather turn away because his testimony isn't to your liking.
These Orchestrated Debates Ignore What the Subjects Were Really All AboutSpot on. Kevin McCarthy said the quiet part out loud when he admitted the Benghazi hearings were all about hurting Clinton's candidacy.