rayboyusmc
Senior Member
since when do qualifications matter?
True: Bush, Palin, Brownie, Chertoff, and most of the Bush appointees of fox in the henhouse policy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
since when do qualifications matter?
The hypocrisy and nonstop double standards held by Democrats that includes what counts as "qualified" actually depends on whether the person has a "D" or an "R" after their name, doesn't it?
No, it does not.
You are missing the fact that the so called liberals on this board are ALSO bitching about Caroline elevation.
Nepotism is rampant in BOTH parties.
You are missing the fact that the so called liberals on this board are ALSO bitching about Caroline elevation.
Nepotism is rampant in BOTH parties.
True: Bush, Palin, Brownie, Chertoff, and most of the Bush appointees of fox in the henhouse policy.
I haven't decided yet how I feel about Caroline Kennedy being Senator. On one hand, I think it was to be anticipated. On the other hand, she will get things done because a) she can raise money like no one's business; and b) she'll be a reliable vote for Obama. Plus, he owes her for going out on a limb for him after Hillary's campaign started wading in muddy waters and that's good for NY.
What I DO find interesting is no one whines about this stuff when it's a man. No one complained when a Rockefeller went into Congress.... or when baby Bush became governor of Texas (soemthing he was wholly ill-equipped for) and later became pres. They only whined about family name when it was Hillary carrying the clinton name... and now Caroline.
Kennedy's annoy the right because they're reliable liberal votes and carry a lot of sway.
So, mostly, I feel like I don't know why this is such a huge deal. The choice here in NY is going to be a Cuomo or a Kennedy. I'd rather it be Caroline Kennedy than Andrew Cuomo.
Yup. Her most qualifying aspect is her political suck, no doubt about that. Incidently, I don't doubt she can be a good Senator.
I don't doubt I could be a good Senator, either, but I rather doubt I'll be tapped for the office.
No one? Well I think that's a tad overstated, Jill. Plenty of us have been calling out the current scion and suggesting that he was never really qualified for that post, too.
And they carrry a lot of sway because this society has accepted that scions will carry on generation after generation because Congress has some sort of sotto voce legacy system going on.
It's a big deal because nepotism flies in the face of a system called meritocracy, that's why.
Yeah, me either.
But the people who are whining about Caroline Kennedy sure weren't whining about Dubya. Me? I've accepted that contacts are a huge part of life. Right?Wrong? Indifferent? ... just fact.
It is nothing new for politics to be the "family business" for some families. Goes back to John Adams/John Quincy Adams. Roosevelt? Kennedy? Bush? Rockefeller?
Now we're worrying about Caroline? Hell, I had hoped her brother would be president.
There are the odd people, like Bill Clinton or Barack Obama, who break through the wall.... but it's not like politicos are anything but a gentry... at least at a certain level.
America's loss in both cases.
True, but that doesn't make their complaint any less valid. Neither does the fact that you are sanguine (or at least resigned) to the fact.
Goes back to Adam and Eve, would be my guess.
I'm not worried about it. I'm just tired of it.
Sadly for every Bill Clinton who breaks through the wall there's a hundred George Bush IIs or Caroline Kennedys shoring it up.
Nothing succeeds like success, ESPECIALLY daddy's success.
no ideaBut who are the alternatives, anyway?
Andy Cuomo? Mark Green??? Yuck.
no idea
i dont live in NY
you mean there isnt a decent US rep that could fill the position?
has to be at least one out of all the ones the have in NY
![]()
I am probably resigned to it because I don't believe in howling at the moon. I am also aware that when people have power, they take their own along. I only ask that the people they take along are capable....and that is where Bush failed. He didn't care about ability.
In my life/career, I have both benefitted from the people who knew me or mine (and who knew I was qualified and capable) and disadvantaged by the contacts of others. My feeling is that I can no more complain about the disadvantages than I do about the advantages.
My dad is very successful in a particular industry. His successes have absolutely no benefit to me in my profession. But I know that if he could have, he would have. I would do the same for my son assuming he were capable...
So I guess that's why I'm resigned to it.
Just being honest.
A not entirely unreasonable approach to this issue.
With the exception of characterizing we who are complaining about it as "howling at the moon" of course, Jillian.
That rather condensending and purposefully insulting comment I might have done without.
How very liberal of you.
But you won't object too much, I hope, if those of us who have never had those advantages gripe a bit about the outcomes that too often come of having to work with morons whose sole claim to leadership is that they started out on third base and hit a home run, will you?
We'll try to howl at the moon such that it doesn't bother the scions in the manor house to awfully much.
But your being a member of the class of people with that family success underpinning your entire life most certainly did benefit you to help you arrive at that place where your father's success made absolutely no difference, I'd wager.
There is no greater skill when going after a job or profession thatn the knowledge that you can fail to get that job, or that you can take that risk and still live indoors if it doesn't work out.
Of course, you'll probably just have to take my word for that.
Neither your nor I can ever prove that, but we can intuit that is is true based on the ironclad statistical correlation between what class people start out in, and what class they typically end up in, here in America.
In fact what class you start out in correlates to where you end up far more than education does.
Basically, and contrary to the popular myth, America has the least social mobility of any industrial nation in the Western world.
That startling statistic leads me to think that nepotism (and its bigger brother classism) are the American love affairs which dare not speak their names.
Nepotism is not only human nature, but social nature, too, especially in collapsing empires.
I appreciate that. Me, too.
Rudy Giuliani. (dodging Jillian's right hook) lol
I haven't decided yet how I feel about Caroline Kennedy being Senator. On one hand, I think it was to be anticipated. On the other hand, she will get things done because a) she can raise money like no one's business; and b) she'll be a reliable vote for Obama. Plus, he owes her for going out on a limb for him after Hillary's campaign started wading in muddy waters and that's good for NY.
What I DO find interesting is no one whines about this stuff when it's a man. No one complained when a Rockefeller went into Congress.... or when baby Bush became governor of Texas (soemthing he was wholly ill-equipped for) and later became pres. They only whined about family name when it was Hillary carrying the clinton name... and now Caroline.
Kennedy's annoy the right because they're reliable liberal votes and carry a lot of sway.
So, mostly, I feel like I don't know why this is such a huge deal. The choice here in NY is going to be a Cuomo or a Kennedy. I'd rather it be Caroline Kennedy than Andrew Cuomo.
Rudy Giuliani. (dodging Jillian's right hook) lol