Dale Smith
Platinum Member
- Sep 10, 2015
- 24,868
- 9,512
I'm not defending gun violence, I'm fully opposed to it. Those who believe there is a place for guns in American politics are the most dangerous among us. No matter what the politics of a gunman, it's the gunman that must be stopped.The phrase is: Law and order.Does he live in Illinois? Was it about 20 miles from Kenosha?Why on Earth would you ask me to show you something I never said??A lot of things are part of the Constitution. We were still talking about the Constitution. Replying "it," as you did, can only rationally be about the Constitution. I accept this as you confessing you're not rational.Which is about the Constitution. That's what we were discussing, the Constitution. You said that about the Constitution ^^^the least you can do is be honest about what I said,,,LOLOLLOLEXACTLY,,,LOLOLliving means it changes naturally through time,,,the constitution requires intentional direct action through many small actions to change it,,,Dumbfuck, if the Constitution wasn't a living document, there would be no amendments.the 2nd doesnt say anything about guns,,nor does it say you have to be in a militia,,if I'm wrong dont tell me show me,,,are you ever going to respond to my statement??There's no reason you shouldn't own an air-to-air missile. Of course, owning a nuke would be impossible because the technology is classified.who cares what his intentions were,,the 2nd amendment is specifically for weapons of war,,,It is if you are 17 years old in Wisconsin you can not open carry, that is breaking the law.It is not wrong to leave your house with your gun, nor to go to a public place and stand there.
It was also breaking the curfew law in place.
It is also against the law to take an assault rifle to a riot with the intent to kill.
It is going to be very hard for the teenager to defend his actions when the prosecutor holds up a terrifying assault weapon to the jury and proclaims, "this is the military assault weapon this man intended to murder somebody with"
View attachment 382165
So far you are wrong on just about everything you posted....
The hispanic teenager may not have been breaking the law....there is an exception for long guns for under 21 year olds....and you have no evidence to show he wanted to kill people, in fact, the actual video evidence shows the exact opposite, you dumb shit.....
And it isn't a military weapon you dumb ass........the AR-15 has never been used by the military....
You don't know what you are talking about.
Family of AR-15 Inventor Eugene Stoner: He Didn't Intend It for Civilians
June 16, 2016, 11:19 AM UTC / Updated June 16, 2016, 6:24 PM UTC
By Tony Dokoupil
Family of AR-15 creator speaks out
June 16, 201601:56
The AR-15 is the most talked about gun in America.
But the AR-15’s creator died before the weapon became a popular hit and his family has never spoken out.
Until now.
"Our father, Eugene Stoner, designed the AR-15 and subsequent M-16 as a military weapon to give our soldiers an advantage over the AK-47,” the Stoner family told NBC News late Wednesday. "He died long before any mass shootings occurred. But, we do think he would have been horrified and sickened as anyone, if not more by these events."
Once Banned, These Assault Rifles Are Hugely Popular in the U.S.
June 14, 201600:52
The inventor’s surviving children and adult grandchildren spoke exclusively to NBC News by phone and email, commenting for the first time on their family’s uneasy legacy. They requested individual anonymity in order to speak freely about such a sensitive topic. They also stopped short of policy prescriptions or legal opinions.
But their comments add unprecedented context to their father’s creation, shedding new light on his intentions and adding firepower to the effort to ban weapons like the AR-15. The comments could also bolster a groundbreaking new lawsuit, which argues that the weapon is a tool of war — never intended for civilians.
Eugene Stoner would have agreed, his family said.
The ex-Marine and "avid sportsman, hunter and skeet shooter" never used his invention for sport. He also never kept it around the house for personal defense. In fact, he never even owned one.
And though he made millions from the design, his family said it was all from military sales.
"After many conversations with him, we feel his intent was that he designed it as a military rifle," his family said, explaining that Stoner was "focused on making the most efficient and superior rifle possible for the military."
He designed the original AR-15 in the late 1950s, working on it in his own garage and later as the chief designer for ArmaLite, a then small company in southern California. He made it light and powerful and he fashioned a new bullet for it — a .223 caliber round capable of piercing a metal helmet at 500 yards.
The Army loved it and renamed it the M16.
Family of AR-15 Inventor: He Didn’t Intend It for Civilians
CASE CLOSED,,,
the 2nd amendment has its legal limits.
why can't you own a ground to air missile launcher? hell, how about yer own little nuke? those are shirley weapons of war.
uh-huh uh-huh uh-huh.
case blown wide open.
thanx for proving just how insane you really are.
the 2nd doesnt say anything about guns or their capacity nor does it say you need to be in a militia,,,
nor does it allow for restrictions of any arms,,,,
i answered you several times. you don't like the answers.
assault weapons weren't around when the constitution was written - therefore your question/statement is moot. the constitution is a living document. do you understand what that means?
' well regulated ' means what then? that anyone can own anything at any time?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! there was a legal ban on assault rifles at one time, & it can happen again.
sorry its not a living document,,again if im wrong show me where it says that,,,![]()
anything else stupid you want to say???
Dumbfuck, It's a piece of parchment with words on on it. It can't change naturally, it needs people to change it.
![]()
and it hasnt been changed with an amendment,,,
Dayum, you're a fucking retard. Yes, the Constitution has been changed with amendments...
Passed by Congress March 4, 1794. Ratified February 7, 1795.Note: Article III, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by amendment 11.The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
[emphasis added to educate the uninformed]
I never said it hasnt happened,,just the the 2nd A hasnt been,,
my god youre dense,,,
You're more retarded than I thought. I was talking about the Constitution being a living document, to which you replied, "it hasnt been changed with an amendment,,," Since I was talking about the Constitution and not the 2nd Amendment, you prove to be a nut who doesn't understand the difference between the Constitution and an amendment.
![]()
this is what I said in #3082
living means it changes naturally through time,,,the constitution requires intentional direct action through many small actions to change it,,,
Then I pointed out you're a retard about the Constitution...
Then you responded back saying "it..." -- which can only rationally be about the Constitution since that's what we were talking about.
But now you say you suffered a brain fart and were actually talking about the 2nd Amendment.
![]()
the 2nd is part of the constitution,,,
so youre bailing out???
have a nice day,,,
then show me where the 2nd amendment to the constitution was changed or repealed by amendment the process,,,
Again, I chalk this up to you not being a rational person.
you said their were restrictions,,,so ,,
show me where the 2nd amendment to the constitution was changed or repealed by amendment the process???
because by definition restrictions violate the text and context of the 2nd A
you obviously are not aware of the facts of the case,,,What then was he defending? He owned no property in Kenosha.He may have been from out of state and if true then he has problems.
He grabbed his gun and drove to where he could use it on people.
And they call him a patriot. What manner of patriotism is this?
please do educate yourself before further comments,,,
I ask again, what was he defending in Kenosha? Why did he go there with his gun?
What was he fighting for in Kenosha? Really you don't know? He was fighting Tryranny and the destruction of america.....along with protecting people from being attacked the democrat brown shirts.......
Why on earth do you think our citizens should or would allow communists and terrorists in BLM to destroy our country and cities along with robbing, looting, raping and murdering with no one to stand up to them. There is something wrong with you....seriously wrong where you think that we as a society should be back to mobs of criminals attacking businesses, people, and cities. Americans have a long history of fighting for what is right you goofy communist and/or foreigner.
Where's that pesky "law" part in shooting two people dead and seriously wounding another?
Or do you want a dozen more Dodge Citie, or Kenoshas?
Funny, I don't see any indignant outrage about "Lefty" that had a gun and fired at least one shot before Rittenhouse returned the favor but actually HIT his targets. Gaige Grosskreutz was packing heat and he allegedly said that he regretted not killing Rittenhouse. Three against one, those are the odds that leftards can only try and win with......fuck'em. Their lives don't mean shit to me at all.
What I am wondering is why is Rittenhouse lionized as a patriot when he was a gun toting thug as all gun toting thugs involved in civil unrest. So Trumpians have a peculiar binary view of gun violence? So long as someone on their 'ream' does the shooting it's good (and politics have devolved into the same bonds of loyalty as sports fans see their team)
Or is the last virtue you have left is a disapproval of vigilante and mob justice?
He was being chased by three adult men, dumb ass. You did see what happened to the white guy that was living out of his truck that ended up at the wrong place and time, right? I certainly didn't see any indignant outrage about that. No outrage by the commie leftists as their fellow comrades
beat store owners in Minneapolis that were trying to protect their businesses. I have heard all I need to hear from ANTIFA and BLM "leaders" and the words of that lezbo Kamala Harris that claimed that they were gonna go after Trump supporters if they get back in power. Fuck that bitch....I didn't vote for Trump but I definitely support MUCH of what he has done and tried to do. I will never, ever side with the commies. She can "hunt" in one hand and squat and shit in the other and let's see which one fills up first. The fact that a disgusting POS like her is on the demcrat commie party ticket tells me all I need to know about those of your kind.