Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you imagine how many home invasions we would have if homeowners did not possess a lot of guns?
It would be like the UK. Have you ever seen the movie "Millions"? A police supervisor is talking to several families about to move into the neighborhood and tells them "You will probably be burglared" and then tells them how to submit an insurance claim. The UK has a notoriously high rate of home invasions and violent crime, much more so than the U.S. To them it's like a cynical lottery that happens to some people and you just hope it isn't you someday because there's nothing you can do to stop it.
Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Yet the UK's violent crime rate is higher than ours.
And lots of countries with fewer guns have lower violent crime rates. We have by far the most guns in the world, shouldn't we have the least violent crime? We don't. Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Can you imagine how many home invasions we would have if homeowners did not possess a lot of guns?
It would be like the UK. Have you ever seen the movie "Millions"? A police supervisor is talking to several families about to move into the neighborhood and tells them "You will probably be burglared" and then tells them how to submit an insurance claim. The UK has a notoriously high rate of home invasions and violent crime, much more so than the U.S. To them it's like a cynical lottery that happens to some people and you just hope it isn't you someday because there's nothing you can do to stop it.
Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Yet the UK's violent crime rate is higher than ours.
And lots of countries with fewer guns have lower violent crime rates. We have by far the most guns in the world, shouldn't we have the least violent crime? We don't. Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Fewer criminals with guns, would create fewer crimes.
How would YOU propose to get the guns away from the criminal?
Am I really the only one who can see there is more to this story? A 17 year old breaks in and rapes a woman. Then drags her to neighbors house to get money? Even fires his gun in the air to scare neighbor. A 17 year old shouldn't be so not worried about getting caught. Something very strange here.
What? A criminal rapist shouldn't be worried about getting shot for being a violent criminal? Well. we always knew you were trying to help the bad guys. Thanks for admitting it.
I'm saying it's strange he was not worried about being caught or being shot for that matter. You need some reading comprehension.
It would be like the UK. Have you ever seen the movie "Millions"? A police supervisor is talking to several families about to move into the neighborhood and tells them "You will probably be burglared" and then tells them how to submit an insurance claim. The UK has a notoriously high rate of home invasions and violent crime, much more so than the U.S. To them it's like a cynical lottery that happens to some people and you just hope it isn't you someday because there's nothing you can do to stop it.
Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Yet the UK's violent crime rate is higher than ours.
And lots of countries with fewer guns have lower violent crime rates. We have by far the most guns in the world, shouldn't we have the least violent crime? We don't. Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Fewer criminals with guns, would create fewer crimes.
How would YOU propose to get the guns away from the criminal?
I don't think fewer guns would create fewer criminals anymore than I believe more guns creates more criminals. The number of guns has nothing to do with the number of criminals.
Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Yet the UK's violent crime rate is higher than ours.
And lots of countries with fewer guns have lower violent crime rates. We have by far the most guns in the world, shouldn't we have the least violent crime? We don't. Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Fewer criminals with guns, would create fewer crimes.
How would YOU propose to get the guns away from the criminal?
I don't think fewer guns would create fewer criminals anymore than I believe more guns creates more criminals. The number of guns has nothing to do with the number of criminals.
??You don't think that a lot of criminals would think twice before breaking into an occupied home, IF they didn't have a gun in their possession, knowing that the homeowner probably DID have a gun??
Am I really the only one who can see there is more to this story? A 17 year old breaks in and rapes a woman. Then drags her to neighbors house to get money? Even fires his gun in the air to scare neighbor. A 17 year old shouldn't be so not worried about getting caught. Something very strange here.
What? A criminal rapist shouldn't be worried about getting shot for being a violent criminal? Well. we always knew you were trying to help the bad guys. Thanks for admitting it.
I'm saying it's strange he was not worried about being caught or being shot for that matter. You need some reading comprehension.
Could it be the way he was brought up????
........... "IF IT FEELS GOOD ............. DO IT"!
Probably never had any consequences for his actions in life.
Yet the UK's violent crime rate is higher than ours.
And lots of countries with fewer guns have lower violent crime rates. We have by far the most guns in the world, shouldn't we have the least violent crime? We don't. Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Fewer criminals with guns, would create fewer crimes.
How would YOU propose to get the guns away from the criminal?
I don't think fewer guns would create fewer criminals anymore than I believe more guns creates more criminals. The number of guns has nothing to do with the number of criminals.
??You don't think that a lot of criminals would think twice before breaking into an occupied home, IF they didn't have a gun in their possession, knowing that the homeowner probably DID have a gun??
I think most criminals now are looking for unoccupied homes. Breaking into an occupied home great lowers your chances of not getting caught.
I am pro human.....just like God.....Shows how much you really know about me. I am 100% pro 2nd amendment and think ANY law that goes AGAINST the 2nd is illegal and unconstitutional. I am merely economically socialist. Not socially."If liberals had their way"? Who the hell do you think you're kidding? You're part of that machine.
Same with me.I am also pro-white. I just feel government has its place within our society!
And lots of countries with fewer guns have lower violent crime rates. We have by far the most guns in the world, shouldn't we have the least violent crime? We don't. Fewer guns would not create more criminals.
Fewer criminals with guns, would create fewer crimes.
How would YOU propose to get the guns away from the criminal?
I don't think fewer guns would create fewer criminals anymore than I believe more guns creates more criminals. The number of guns has nothing to do with the number of criminals.
??You don't think that a lot of criminals would think twice before breaking into an occupied home, IF they didn't have a gun in their possession, knowing that the homeowner probably DID have a gun??
I think most criminals now are looking for unoccupied homes. Breaking into an occupied home great lowers your chances of not getting caught.
That's not true. There are loads of cheap security cameras that catch burglars all the time.
Fewer criminals with guns, would create fewer crimes.
How would YOU propose to get the guns away from the criminal?
I don't think fewer guns would create fewer criminals anymore than I believe more guns creates more criminals. The number of guns has nothing to do with the number of criminals.
??You don't think that a lot of criminals would think twice before breaking into an occupied home, IF they didn't have a gun in their possession, knowing that the homeowner probably DID have a gun??
I think most criminals now are looking for unoccupied homes. Breaking into an occupied home great lowers your chances of not getting caught.
That's not true. There are loads of cheap security cameras that catch burglars all the time.
Yes some places have security cameras, but they are not everywhere. If the home is occupied then well there is 100% chance somebody is there. Do you really want to argue that an unoccupied home isn't an easier target than an occupied one?
I don't think fewer guns would create fewer criminals anymore than I believe more guns creates more criminals. The number of guns has nothing to do with the number of criminals.
??You don't think that a lot of criminals would think twice before breaking into an occupied home, IF they didn't have a gun in their possession, knowing that the homeowner probably DID have a gun??
I think most criminals now are looking for unoccupied homes. Breaking into an occupied home great lowers your chances of not getting caught.
That's not true. There are loads of cheap security cameras that catch burglars all the time.
Yes some places have security cameras, but they are not everywhere. If the home is occupied then well there is 100% chance somebody is there. Do you really want to argue that an unoccupied home isn't an easier target than an occupied one?
No argument there. Of course there are some "burglars" who are violent people who enjoy the fact they can terrify and rape the inhabitants. What do you do about those in your gun free paradise?
??You don't think that a lot of criminals would think twice before breaking into an occupied home, IF they didn't have a gun in their possession, knowing that the homeowner probably DID have a gun??
I think most criminals now are looking for unoccupied homes. Breaking into an occupied home great lowers your chances of not getting caught.
That's not true. There are loads of cheap security cameras that catch burglars all the time.
Yes some places have security cameras, but they are not everywhere. If the home is occupied then well there is 100% chance somebody is there. Do you really want to argue that an unoccupied home isn't an easier target than an occupied one?
No argument there. Of course there are some "burglars" who are violent people who enjoy the fact they can terrify and rape the inhabitants. What do you do about those in your gun free paradise?
You keep saying stuff like that, but I've never posted anything about a gun free paradise. You again seem very confused. And please keep in mind many armed defenders are shot and killed. Having a gun for defense does not guarantee anyone they will not be killed.
I think most criminals now are looking for unoccupied homes. Breaking into an occupied home great lowers your chances of not getting caught.
That's not true. There are loads of cheap security cameras that catch burglars all the time.
Yes some places have security cameras, but they are not everywhere. If the home is occupied then well there is 100% chance somebody is there. Do you really want to argue that an unoccupied home isn't an easier target than an occupied one?
No argument there. Of course there are some "burglars" who are violent people who enjoy the fact they can terrify and rape the inhabitants. What do you do about those in your gun free paradise?
You keep saying stuff like that, but I've never posted anything about a gun free paradise. You again seem very confused. And please keep in mind many armed defenders are shot and killed. Having a gun for defense does not guarantee anyone they will not be killed.
Many are, yes... Life isn't fair. But they kill more than twice as many bad guys every year as do police. So the cost/benefit analysis is decidedly in our favor. Not yours.
Can you imagine how many home invasions we would have if homeowners did not possess a lot of guns?
