RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
- Dec 23, 2009
- 35,722
- 15,937
I had you mixed up with another. My bad.You brought the nanny description into this.It was a totally legit question.Are you considering people who oppose pot smokers inflicting their drug onto others as a nanny thing?
Why do you insist on asking assinine questions? You are one obtuse weenie.
You’re ok with people inflicting their drug onto others?
No, it was a stupid question. If something is legalized, it's legal, not mandatory.
No, I didn't. I never even used the word nanny once in this entire thread. Dude, can you even read gud?
I asked if you consider people who object to public pot smoking because of very real issues with that drug as a nanny thing. That’s a legit question. Do you have a legit response?
I'm the guy minding my own business. You must be the other guy. As long as something isn't illegal, who am I to tell others what they can or can't do in public? That's a job for liberal progressives. You aren't an arbiter of public behavior. Dont tell me: you're one of those weenies that trys to regulate speeds in passing lanes too. When you believe everyone is an asshole, odds are, the asshole is you. Food for thought.
As for public behavior, exposing others to contaminated breathing air should not be legal.