The Benghazi "scandal" versus the 9-11 "scandal"

[nat4900]

Here's a bottom line for all you right wing morons.......

Mistakes were made regarding Benghazi.....(including what no one wants to mention for fear of "blaming" the victims that Stevens had NO business being in the Benghazi consulate since it was long determined that Benghazi was a city much MORE hostile toward Americans than Tripoli)

So, if mistakes were made, you....as right wingers....want to "conclude" that Hillary Clinton should NOT be president.

Now, compare to the mistake made regarding 9-11........3,000 people died (versus the 4 in Benghazi) and you not only held Bush blameless, but you actually helped to re-elect him a second time.

Objectivity and conservatism don't ever seem to go together.

 

[nat4900]

Fact: E-mails were released. They were practically begging the Clinton State Department for more security in Benghazi for months.

So, moron......WHY did ambassador Stevens decide to go there when apparently he KNEW it was unsafe???

 

[nat4900]

You’ll never guess who comes off as a hero of the Republican-drafted House Benghazi committee’s majority report: [AMAZINGLY].......President Obama.

Within 90 minutes of the Sept. 11, 2012, surprise attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound that killed Ambassador J.  Christopher Stevens and an aide, the report tells us, Obama had told his secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to do everything possible, implicitly including using military force, to protect Americans.

These were “very clear directions,” according to Peter Roskam (R-Ill.), one of Obama’s harshest critics on the panel.

The dangerous delusion that the Americans in Benghazi could have been saved