Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Define socialismThe Government represents us. They do as much or as little as we want
If We the People are not happy with their choices, we vote them out
It has happened tens of thousands of times
thats true, but many times the damage is already done. the better solution is to elect people who understand what this country stands for------------------and its not socialism, winger/jake.
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
Obamacare, "I want to redistribute the wealth". "you didn't build that". "fair share" "free jr college" obamaphones.
I could go on for several paragraphs, but maybe you get it--------------probably not.
Obamaphones, I prefer the Obamagas...Define socialismthats true, but many times the damage is already done. the better solution is to elect people who understand what this country stands for------------------and its not socialism, winger/jake.
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
Obamacare, "I want to redistribute the wealth". "you didn't build that". "fair share" "free jr college" obamaphones.
I could go on for several paragraphs, but maybe you get it--------------probably not.
Do you even know what a Marxist collectivist is? Or is it just some word you picked up on a rightwing blog?
None of those things is either Marxist or collectivist, they are just functions of government
Define socialism
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
Obamacare, "I want to redistribute the wealth". "you didn't build that". "fair share" "free jr college" obamaphones.
I could go on for several paragraphs, but maybe you get it--------------probably not.
So NO, you have NOTHING
John Adams, Founding Father and 2nd President; Thoughts on Government, 1776:
"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for the profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."
where does Adams advocate for a welfare state. Adams based that quote on a country where everyone was working. He was also correct that we get the govt that we vote for. You fools elected obama twice so you are responsible for the mess he has made.
He's dreaming of a 5 year plan for collective farms...Define socialismthats true, but many times the damage is already done. the better solution is to elect people who understand what this country stands for------------------and its not socialism, winger/jake.
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
Obamacare, "I want to redistribute the wealth". "you didn't build that". "fair share" "free jr college" obamaphones.
I could go on for several paragraphs, but maybe you get it--------------probably not.
Do you even know what a Marxist collectivist is? Or is it just some word you picked up on a rightwing blog?
None of those things is either Marxist or collectivist, they are just functions of government
But the stinking rich corps and people will not circulate the cash into the economy, so the working are not poor...sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
Obamacare, "I want to redistribute the wealth". "you didn't build that". "fair share" "free jr college" obamaphones.
I could go on for several paragraphs, but maybe you get it--------------probably not.
So NO, you have NOTHING
John Adams, Founding Father and 2nd President; Thoughts on Government, 1776:
"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for the profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."
where does Adams advocate for a welfare state. Adams based that quote on a country where everyone was working. He was also correct that we get the govt that we vote for. You fools elected obama twice so you are responsible for the mess he has made.
Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households
Such beliefs are starkly at odds with the basic facts regarding social programs, the analysis finds. Federal budget and Census data show that, in 2010, 91 percentof the benefit dollars from entitlement and other mandatory programs went to the elderly (people 65 and over), the seriously disabled, and members of working households. People who are neither elderly nor disabled — and do not live in a working household — received only 9 percent of the benefits.
Moreover, the vast bulk of that 9 percent goes for medical care, unemployment insurance benefits (which individuals must have a significant work history to receive), Social Security survivor benefits for the children and spouses of deceased workers, and Social Security benefits for retirees between ages 62 and 64. Seven out of the 9 percentage points go for one of these four purposes.
Contrary to Entitlement Society Rhetoric Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly Disabled or Working Households mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Socialism - We're all in this boat together, we should help each other...
A noble idea that when enforced by gov't at gunpoint just doesn't work.
Yes, and we see the libertarian wonderland where again? The closest you Klowns have are Somalia or Russia, lol
The closest you socialist BOZOs have to your "Worker's Paradise" is Venezuela and Cuba. Yeah ... let's be like them.
Well No Bubba, I'd take Germany, Sweden, UK, etc. You know most other developed nation who don't allow the 'job creators' to treat US as chattel? lol
HOW ABOUT A SPOT YOU WANT TO COPY, SINCE YOU DON'T LIKE THE WAY THE US HAS BEEN GOING THE PAST 100+ YEARS WITH PROGRESS?
Whenever you ask a leftwinger for an example of successful socialism they always list countries like German and Sweden that are largely capitalist. their idea of successful is where socialism hasn't gone to the point where it completely destroys the country. Of course, the more socialist a country gets, the faster it swirls down the drain. Hence we have countries like Cuba and Venezuela. Yet, somehow these countries aren't "socialist." They are "third world."
The role of government is to allow the PURSUIT of happiness, not to guarantee that everyone will find it.
The role of government is to get out of the way of business and let the free market, supply and demand, and individual hard work drive success (or failure).
"just get the hell out of my way" John Galt to the government in Atlas Shrugged.
Prior to FDR the presumption of government was to produce the conditions for the "pursuit of happiness." FDR said, "why stop there, the federal government can produce happiness" ( understood as material well-being ) thus the New Deal, road to socialism and ruination of the principles the Founders spent much time on, in their famous U.S. Constitution, that is now almost up in flames. Obammy is fast closing it out, completely. We poor hard-working sucking taxpayers.
Often misquoted as ‘The business of America is business,” Coolidge really said:
“...After all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world. I am strongly of opinion that the great majority of people will always find these are moving impulses of our life. …
Wealth is the product of industry, ambition, character and untiring effort. In all experience, the accumulation of wealth means the multiplication of schools, the increase of knowledge, the dissemination of intelligence, the encouragement of science, the broadening of outlook, the expansion of liberties, the widening of culture.
Of course, the accumulation of wealth cannot be justified as the chief end of existence. But we are compelled to recognize it as a means to well-nigh every desirable achievement. So long as wealth is made the means and not the end, we need not greatly fear it.”
January 17, 1925 Given before the American Society of Newspaper Editors
"We grudge no man a fortune which represents his own power and sagacity, when exercised with entire regard to the welfare of his fellows."
Teddy Roosevelt spoke impassionedly about great wealth, saying that it is "not even enough that it should have been gained without doing damage to the community. We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community.
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father's has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
From Jefferson's prospectus for his translation of Destutt de Tracy's Treatise on Political Economy, communicated to Joseph Milligan in a letter of April 6, 1816.
The text this quotation appears in has not yet been published by the Papers of Thomas Jefferson: Retirement Series, but you can see Jefferson's retained copy of the prospectus in the Thomas Jefferson Papers at the Library of Congress, online at http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mtj1&fileName=mtj1page048.db....
Original here:
The Thomas Jefferson Papers Series 1. General Correspondence. 1651-1827
A power to dispose of estates for ever is manifestly absurd. The earth and the fulness of it belongs to every generation, and the preceding one can have no right to bind it up from posterity. Such extension of property is quite unnatural. Thomas Jefferson
The causes which destroyed the ancient republics were numerous; but in Rome, one principal cause was the vast inequality of fortunes. Noah Webster
The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful, and to despise, or, at least, to neglect persons of poor and mean condition is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments. Adam Smith
Define socialismThat doesn't address the problem at all. The problem isn't that the majority might be unhappy with the decision. The problem is that we all have our own definition of the good life. And government should protect our freedom to pursue that vision, rather than dictating what it should be.
The Government represents us. They do as much or as little as we want
If We the People are not happy with their choices, we vote them out
It has happened tens of thousands of times
thats true, but many times the damage is already done. the better solution is to elect people who understand what this country stands for------------------and its not socialism, winger/jake.
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
Socialism - We're all in this boat together, we should help each other...
A noble idea that when enforced by gov't at gunpoint just doesn't work.
Yes, and we see the libertarian wonderland where again? The closest you Klowns have are Somalia or Russia, lol
The closest you socialist BOZOs have to your "Worker's Paradise" is Venezuela and Cuba. Yeah ... let's be like them.
Well No Bubba, I'd take Germany, Sweden, UK, etc. You know most other developed nation who don't allow the 'job creators' to treat US as chattel? lol
HOW ABOUT A SPOT YOU WANT TO COPY, SINCE YOU DON'T LIKE THE WAY THE US HAS BEEN GOING THE PAST 100+ YEARS WITH PROGRESS?
Whenever you ask a leftwinger for an example of successful socialism they always list countries like German and Sweden that are largely capitalist. their idea of successful is where socialism hasn't gone to the point where it completely destroys the country. Of course, the more socialist a country gets, the faster it swirls down the drain. Hence we have countries like Cuba and Venezuela. Yet, somehow these countries aren't "socialist." They are "third world."
So ,,if I am a communist, I won't get inherent diseases?Prior to FDR the presumption of government was to produce the conditions for the "pursuit of happiness." FDR said, "why stop there, the federal government can produce happiness" ( understood as material well-being ) thus the New Deal, road to socialism and ruination of the principles the Founders spent much time on, in their famous U.S. Constitution, that is now almost up in flames. Obammy is fast closing it out, completely. We poor hard-working sucking taxpayers.
Often misquoted as ‘The business of America is business,” Coolidge really said:
“...After all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world. I am strongly of opinion that the great majority of people will always find these are moving impulses of our life. …
Wealth is the product of industry, ambition, character and untiring effort. In all experience, the accumulation of wealth means the multiplication of schools, the increase of knowledge, the dissemination of intelligence, the encouragement of science, the broadening of outlook, the expansion of liberties, the widening of culture.
Of course, the accumulation of wealth cannot be justified as the chief end of existence. But we are compelled to recognize it as a means to well-nigh every desirable achievement. So long as wealth is made the means and not the end, we need not greatly fear it.”
January 17, 1925 Given before the American Society of Newspaper Editors
"We grudge no man a fortune which represents his own power and sagacity, when exercised with entire regard to the welfare of his fellows."
Teddy Roosevelt spoke impassionedly about great wealth, saying that it is "not even enough that it should have been gained without doing damage to the community. We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community.
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father's has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
From Jefferson's prospectus for his translation of Destutt de Tracy's Treatise on Political Economy, communicated to Joseph Milligan in a letter of April 6, 1816.
The text this quotation appears in has not yet been published by the Papers of Thomas Jefferson: Retirement Series, but you can see Jefferson's retained copy of the prospectus in the Thomas Jefferson Papers at the Library of Congress, online at http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mtj1&fileName=mtj1page048.db....
Original here:
The Thomas Jefferson Papers Series 1. General Correspondence. 1651-1827
A power to dispose of estates for ever is manifestly absurd. The earth and the fulness of it belongs to every generation, and the preceding one can have no right to bind it up from posterity. Such extension of property is quite unnatural. Thomas Jefferson
The causes which destroyed the ancient republics were numerous; but in Rome, one principal cause was the vast inequality of fortunes. Noah Webster
The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful, and to despise, or, at least, to neglect persons of poor and mean condition is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments. Adam Smith
10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks
Define socialismThe Government represents us. They do as much or as little as we want
If We the People are not happy with their choices, we vote them out
It has happened tens of thousands of times
thats true, but many times the damage is already done. the better solution is to elect people who understand what this country stands for------------------and its not socialism, winger/jake.
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
1. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately. Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.
2. Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked theAmerican Medical Associationbecause of his conflicting views onsocialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).
b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life." Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252
Do you even know what you voted for?
How many people died from famines under the Czars?Define socialismThe Government represents us. They do as much or as little as we want
If We the People are not happy with their choices, we vote them out
It has happened tens of thousands of times
thats true, but many times the damage is already done. the better solution is to elect people who understand what this country stands for------------------and its not socialism, winger/jake.
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
1. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately. Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.
2. Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked theAmerican Medical Associationbecause of his conflicting views onsocialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).
b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life." Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252
Do you even know what you voted for?
Define socialism
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
Obamacare, "I want to redistribute the wealth". "you didn't build that". "fair share" "free jr college" obamaphones.
I could go on for several paragraphs, but maybe you get it--------------probably not.
So NO, you have NOTHING
John Adams, Founding Father and 2nd President; Thoughts on Government, 1776:
"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for the profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."
When John Adams referred to "the people" he didn't mean all the deadbeats and freeloaders.
Prior to FDR the presumption of government was to produce the conditions for the "pursuit of happiness." FDR said, "why stop there, the federal government can produce happiness" ( understood as material well-being ) thus the New Deal, road to socialism and ruination of the principles the Founders spent much time on, in their famous U.S. Constitution, that is now almost up in flames. Obammy is fast closing it out, completely. We poor hard-working sucking taxpayers.
Often misquoted as ‘The business of America is business,” Coolidge really said:
“...After all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world. I am strongly of opinion that the great majority of people will always find these are moving impulses of our life. …
Wealth is the product of industry, ambition, character and untiring effort. In all experience, the accumulation of wealth means the multiplication of schools, the increase of knowledge, the dissemination of intelligence, the encouragement of science, the broadening of outlook, the expansion of liberties, the widening of culture.
Of course, the accumulation of wealth cannot be justified as the chief end of existence. But we are compelled to recognize it as a means to well-nigh every desirable achievement. So long as wealth is made the means and not the end, we need not greatly fear it.”
January 17, 1925 Given before the American Society of Newspaper Editors
"We grudge no man a fortune which represents his own power and sagacity, when exercised with entire regard to the welfare of his fellows."
Teddy Roosevelt spoke impassionedly about great wealth, saying that it is "not even enough that it should have been gained without doing damage to the community. We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community.
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father's has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
From Jefferson's prospectus for his translation of Destutt de Tracy's Treatise on Political Economy, communicated to Joseph Milligan in a letter of April 6, 1816.
The text this quotation appears in has not yet been published by the Papers of Thomas Jefferson: Retirement Series, but you can see Jefferson's retained copy of the prospectus in the Thomas Jefferson Papers at the Library of Congress, online at http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mtj1&fileName=mtj1page048.db....
Original here:
The Thomas Jefferson Papers Series 1. General Correspondence. 1651-1827
A power to dispose of estates for ever is manifestly absurd. The earth and the fulness of it belongs to every generation, and the preceding one can have no right to bind it up from posterity. Such extension of property is quite unnatural. Thomas Jefferson
The causes which destroyed the ancient republics were numerous; but in Rome, one principal cause was the vast inequality of fortunes. Noah Webster
The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful, and to despise, or, at least, to neglect persons of poor and mean condition is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments. Adam Smith
10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks
So ,,if I am a communist, I won't get inherent diseases?Often misquoted as ‘The business of America is business,” Coolidge really said:
“...After all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world. I am strongly of opinion that the great majority of people will always find these are moving impulses of our life. …
Wealth is the product of industry, ambition, character and untiring effort. In all experience, the accumulation of wealth means the multiplication of schools, the increase of knowledge, the dissemination of intelligence, the encouragement of science, the broadening of outlook, the expansion of liberties, the widening of culture.
Of course, the accumulation of wealth cannot be justified as the chief end of existence. But we are compelled to recognize it as a means to well-nigh every desirable achievement. So long as wealth is made the means and not the end, we need not greatly fear it.”
January 17, 1925 Given before the American Society of Newspaper Editors
"We grudge no man a fortune which represents his own power and sagacity, when exercised with entire regard to the welfare of his fellows."
Teddy Roosevelt spoke impassionedly about great wealth, saying that it is "not even enough that it should have been gained without doing damage to the community. We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community.
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father's has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
From Jefferson's prospectus for his translation of Destutt de Tracy's Treatise on Political Economy, communicated to Joseph Milligan in a letter of April 6, 1816.
The text this quotation appears in has not yet been published by the Papers of Thomas Jefferson: Retirement Series, but you can see Jefferson's retained copy of the prospectus in the Thomas Jefferson Papers at the Library of Congress, online at http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mtj1&fileName=mtj1page048.db....
Original here:
The Thomas Jefferson Papers Series 1. General Correspondence. 1651-1827
A power to dispose of estates for ever is manifestly absurd. The earth and the fulness of it belongs to every generation, and the preceding one can have no right to bind it up from posterity. Such extension of property is quite unnatural. Thomas Jefferson
The causes which destroyed the ancient republics were numerous; but in Rome, one principal cause was the vast inequality of fortunes. Noah Webster
The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful, and to despise, or, at least, to neglect persons of poor and mean condition is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments. Adam Smith
10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks
Define socialismthats true, but many times the damage is already done. the better solution is to elect people who understand what this country stands for------------------and its not socialism, winger/jake.
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
1. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately. Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.
2. Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked theAmerican Medical Associationbecause of his conflicting views onsocialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).
b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life." Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252
Do you even know what you voted for?
Totally unrelated to what I posted but a wonderful attempt at meaninless cut and paste passed off as your own
How many people died from famines under the Czars?Define socialismthats true, but many times the damage is already done. the better solution is to elect people who understand what this country stands for------------------and its not socialism, winger/jake.
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
1. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately. Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.
2. Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked theAmerican Medical Associationbecause of his conflicting views onsocialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).
b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life." Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252
Do you even know what you voted for?
Define socialism
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
1. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately. Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.
2. Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked theAmerican Medical Associationbecause of his conflicting views onsocialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).
b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life." Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252
Do you even know what you voted for?
Totally unrelated to what I posted but a wonderful attempt at meaninless cut and paste passed off as your own
Liar.
You tried to pull a fast one, demanding: "Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist."
And I did.
So ,,if I am a communist, I won't get inherent diseases?"We grudge no man a fortune which represents his own power and sagacity, when exercised with entire regard to the welfare of his fellows."
Teddy Roosevelt spoke impassionedly about great wealth, saying that it is "not even enough that it should have been gained without doing damage to the community. We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community.
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father's has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
From Jefferson's prospectus for his translation of Destutt de Tracy's Treatise on Political Economy, communicated to Joseph Milligan in a letter of April 6, 1816.
The text this quotation appears in has not yet been published by the Papers of Thomas Jefferson: Retirement Series, but you can see Jefferson's retained copy of the prospectus in the Thomas Jefferson Papers at the Library of Congress, online at http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mtj1&fileName=mtj1page048.db....
Original here:
The Thomas Jefferson Papers Series 1. General Correspondence. 1651-1827
A power to dispose of estates for ever is manifestly absurd. The earth and the fulness of it belongs to every generation, and the preceding one can have no right to bind it up from posterity. Such extension of property is quite unnatural. Thomas Jefferson
The causes which destroyed the ancient republics were numerous; but in Rome, one principal cause was the vast inequality of fortunes. Noah Webster
The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful, and to despise, or, at least, to neglect persons of poor and mean condition is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments. Adam Smith
10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks
Ya' shoulda' quit while you were ahead.
Define socialism
To you....socialism is any time the government does anything to help the people
sorry, asshole, your hero obozo the great is really more of a marxist collectivist----------look it up ya fricken jerk.
Ok
Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist
Do you even know what the words mean?
1. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately. Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.
2. Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked theAmerican Medical Associationbecause of his conflicting views onsocialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).
b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life." Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252
Do you even know what you voted for?
Totally unrelated to what I posted but a wonderful attempt at meaninless cut and paste passed off as your own
Liar.
You tried to pull a fast one, demanding: "Point to any Obama policy that could be considered Marxist Collectivist."
And I did.
