The Calguns Foundation Wins Handgun Carry Lawsuit Against the Los Angeles Sheriff’s

Geaux4it

Intensity Factor 4-Fold
May 31, 2009
22,873
4,295
Chalk up another win against the pressure the second amendment is under in California. We will succeed in restoring the freedom and liberties that were so hard fought for.

One step at a time

-Geaux

The Calguns Foundation Wins Handgun Carry Lawsuit Against the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department

on January 14, 2014 in Press Releases
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Tuesday, January 14, 2014

The Calguns Foundation Wins Handgun Carry Lawsuit Against the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department and Sheriff Lee Baca

The organization promises more lawsuits after latest Sunshine and Compliance Initiative court victory.

ROSEVILLE, CA — In a decision released today that forces the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department to begin accepting and processing handgun carry license applications, Judge Deirdre Hill said that LASD must “consider the applications of all persons seeking a CCW permit in the first instance without requiring any applicant to first seek a CCW permit with his/her local police chief or city.”

The case, titled Lu v. Baca, was filed in 2012 by California-based gun rights organization The Calguns Foundation and a number of individual plaintiffs seeking to overturn an unlawful LASD policy that functioned as a de facto ban on handgun carry licenses for Los Angeles County residents.

“This decision means that all Californians need not jump through more hoops than those required under state law in order to apply for a handgun carry license and exercise their Second Amendment rights,” explained Gene Hoffman, the group’s Chairman.

According to the Foundation’s executive director, Brandon Combs, the victory represents an affirmation of its legal strategy and presents new opportunities to advance gun rights in the Golden State.

“It’s long past time for sheriffs and police chiefs to adhere to the same laws they swore an oath to enforce, starting with the Constitution,” said Combs. “Hopefully they’re getting the message that our fundamental rights are not open to debate. We’ll keep filing lawsuits if that’s what it takes to restore Second Amendment freedoms in California.”

“I’m very pleased by the outcome,” said Charles Hokanson, the plaintiffs’ Long Beach-based attorney. “It is always positive to see the rights of law-abiding people vindicated as they were today in this decision.”

Earlier this month, CGF published two comprehensive reports on handgun carry licenses in the state, which can be viewed or downloaded for free at www.calgunsfoundation.org/carry.

Based on data from the California Department of Justice and other government sources, the Foundation’s reports show an increase of nearly 30,000 handgun carry licensees since it began efforts to make California “shall-issue” in May of 2009, when it and the Bellevue, Washington-based Second Amendment Foundation filed the first “right to carry” lawsuit in the nation since the United States Supreme Court’s historic D.C. v. Heller decision in 2008. CGF noted that it is currently awaiting a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in its federal Second Amendment carry lawsuit Richards v. Prieto, the filings for which can be found on CGF’s online Wiki at Richards v. Prieto - Calguns Foundation Wiki.

As reported on the Foundation’s website, CGF’s Carry License Sunshine and Compliance Initiative uses grassroots-funded research, publications, and litigation to:

Acquire and publish objective carry license statistics for evaluation and public scrutiny

Audit and publish the policies and practices of California’s licensing authorities

Acquire and publish carry license application records and other public documents that are or indicate the actual practices of California’s licensing authorities

Help carry license applicants through the maze of state laws and local rules

Force California’s licensing authorities to comply with state laws, legal precedent, and the United States Constitution

Link to the release- http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/20...angeles-sheriffs-department-sheriff-lee-baca/

The Lu v. Baca decision can be viewed or downloaded at The Calguns Foundation Wins Handgun Carry Lawsuit Against the Los Angeles Sheriff?s Department and Sheriff Lee Baca | Calguns FoundationCalguns Foundation.
 
Last edited:
Police themselves are trained to assume that there is a weapon in any encounter they may have.

Now the bad guys can assume the same. As it should be.

I'm 3-4 months away from receiving my Illinois permit and I couldn't be happier.
 
Police themselves are trained to assume that there is a weapon in any encounter they may have.

Now the bad guys can assume the same. As it should be.

I'm 3-4 months away from receiving my Illinois permit and I couldn't be happier.

I can't imagine what it is like to live in that corrupt state. There is no way I could move there and take my arsenal.
 
They'll probably just ignore it, the po po that is.

Perhaps, but this is not CGF first rodeo. Down went Ventura County Sheriff Dean in a lawsuit forcing him to release 'approved' good cause statements for issuance of a CCW. You see, Ventura County is not a 'shall issue', but a 'may issue' based on certain criteria. That being good cause and moral character. Besides 'may issue' being unconstitutional, going through the process had no consistency. Come to find, Sheriff Dean was denying applicants with identical good cause statements as those approved. Some statements were simple as 'self defense'. Turns out he was issuing permits to his cronies and his 'posse'.

Long story short, this latest litigation is just another box checked that will be beneficial in the next step to restoration of our rights.

Link to the Ventura County Victory- http://www.vcstar.com/news/2010/oct/20/gun-group-sues-ventura-county-sheriff-to-obtain/

-Geaux
 
Last edited:
Police themselves are trained to assume that there is a weapon in any encounter they may have.

Now the bad guys can assume the same. As it should be.

I'm 3-4 months away from receiving my Illinois permit and I couldn't be happier.

I can't imagine what it is like to live in that corrupt state. There is no way I could move there and take my arsenal.

You could, but I wouldn't advise it LOL. Hell, I'd move out if I could. Well I can, but i'd still pay state income tax because this is where we roll.
 
Illinois scares that hell out of me. I've been to Chicago and East St. Louis. Those places might as well be Fallujah. And the cops? They're all bent. You don't dare drive across Illinois with an out of state tag. I'm happy right here with 4 assault rifles, 4 shotguns, and 5 pistols.
 
Illinois scares that hell out of me. I've been to Chicago and East St. Louis. Those places might as well be Fallujah. And the cops? They're all bent. You don't dare drive across Illinois with an out of state tag. I'm happy right here with 4 assault rifles, 4 shotguns, and 5 pistols.

I lost all my guns in a tragic boating accident :mad:

-Geaux
 
Illinois scares that hell out of me. I've been to Chicago and East St. Louis. Those places might as well be Fallujah. And the cops? They're all bent. You don't dare drive across Illinois with an out of state tag. I'm happy right here with 4 assault rifles, 4 shotguns, and 5 pistols.

I lost all my guns in a tragic boating accident :mad:

-Geaux

That sucks. Too bad you couldn't recover them before they started to deteriorate.
 
If the tide can be turned in California look out because so goes California, so goes the Nation (gun laws)

So all the gun grabbers should take note- Even if oppressive laws are passed, Americans will not stand for it in the long run

-Geaux
 

Forum List

Back
Top