The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

[Crick]

You are doing great Patriot, but he is too far gone to rationally understand how you used his own words to destroy him because he never thinks beyond the end of his nose.

Meanwhile here is an useful prediction page to catch up on at Watts Up With That? that shows new predictions come online while they show older ones that failed all in detail and direct links to predictions it is the definitive expose of failed prediction to see.

Failed Prediction Timeline

LINK

Actual predictions by climate science that have NOT failed

1) CO2 levels will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with fossil fuel usage
2) Global temperatures will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with CO2 levels.
3) There will be deleterious effects on the Earth's flora and fauna from the unprecedentedly rapid temperature increase.

You fools cannot deny these basics facts. God you fuckers are STUPID.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Actual predictions by climate science that have NOT failed

1) CO2 levels will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with fossil fuel usage
2) Global temperatures will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with CO2 levels.
3) There will be deleterious effects on the Earth's flora and fauna from the unprecedentedly rapid temperature increase.

You fools cannot deny these basics facts. God you fuckers are STUPID.

7-12 times faster..........still no evidence.

DURR

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Actual predictions by climate science that have NOT failed

1) CO2 levels will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with fossil fuel usage
2) Global temperatures will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with CO2 levels.

I blame the trees and animals with gas, would eliminating them ease the pain at all?...this is all about the price tag

3) There will be deleterious effects on the Earth's flora and fauna from the unprecedentedly rapid temperature increase.

so as "a prediction that has not failed" this has already occurred?

You fools cannot deny these basics facts. God you fuckers are STUPID.

how bad will the language and name calling get if you are denied access to the vault?

 

[Crick]

I blame the trees and animals with gas, would eliminating them ease the pain at all?...this is all about the price tag

The trees and animals are not responsible for the increase in CO2. Isotopic analysis shows that the excess originated from the combustion of fossil fuels. If you need that explained, just let me know.

so as "a prediction that has not failed" this has already occurred?

Yes.

how bad will the language and name calling get if you are denied access to the vault?

I have no idea what vault you're talking about.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

3) There will be deleterious effects on the Earth's flora and fauna from the unprecedentedly rapid temperature increase.

How does this reconcile itself with the greenhouse effect? does the definition need amending? or will it go the way of "women" where we must consult science professionals to understand how plant growth is and is not destroying the planet?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

The trees and animals are not responsible for the increase in CO2. Isotopic analysis shows that the excess originated from the combustion of fossil fuels. If you need that explained, just let me know.

Actually I knew the whole "cow farts" thing was a hoax too, just needed a hoaxer to make the claim for me.

Yes.

so claiming it is "going to happen" is wrong.

I have no idea what vault you're talking about.

then perhaps you should stop pretending to know what is really going on.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Actual predictions by climate science that have NOT failed

1) CO2 levels will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with fossil fuel usage
2) Global temperatures will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with CO2 levels.
3) There will be deleterious effects on the Earth's flora and fauna from the unprecedentedly rapid temperature increase.

You fools cannot deny these basics facts. God you fuckers are STUPID.

You are LYING and Misleading as usual and there is no Climate Emergency showing up.

NASA doesn't agree with you because the planet is VERY HAPPY for all the additional CO2 floating around in the air:

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

Quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK

=================

No evidence of a developing Climate Emergency either which YOU and other climate cultists ignores over and over:

Where Is The “Climate Emergency”?​

LINK

================

Fact: NO Hotspot exists.

Fact: NO Positive Feedback Loop exists.

Fact: Crop yields continues to increase.

Fact: NO developing Climate emergency exists.

Fact: CO2 at the 440 ppm level has negligible warm forcing left as this chart amply demonstrates.

LINK

and this,


Next, here is the radical change in downwelling radiation at the surface from the increase in CO2 that is supposed to be driving the “CLIMATE EMERGENCY!!!” What I’ve shown is the change that in theory would have occurred from the changes in CO2 from 1750 to the present, and the change that in theory will occur in the future when CO2 increases from its present value to twice the 1750 value. This is using the generally accepted (although not rigorously derived) claim that the downwelling radiation change from a doubling of CO2 is 3.7 watts per square metre (W/m2). The purpose is to show how small these CO2-caused changes are compared to total downwelling radiation.

The changes in downwelling radiation from the increase in CO2 are trivially small, lost in the noise …

LINK

and this too showing that CO2 almost nothing left at the 400 ppm level and has been known since 1971 by published research.

3 Physicists Use Experimental Evidence To Show CO2’s Capacity To Absorb Radiation Has Saturated

LINK

================

You have been wrong for years now.

 

[abu afak]

You are LYING and Misleading as usual and there is no Climate Emergency showing up.

NASA doesn't agree with you because the planet is VERY HAPPY for all the additional CO2 floating around in the air:

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

Quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK

=================

No evidence of a developing Climate Emergency either which YOU and other climate cultists ignores over and over:

Where Is The “Climate Emergency”?​

LINK

================

Fact: NO Hotspot exists.

Fact: NO Positive Feedback Loop exists.

Fact: Crop yields continues to increase.

Fact: NO developing Climate emergency exists.

Fact: CO2 at the 440 ppm level has negligible warm forcing left as this chart amply demonstrates.

View attachment 938568


LINK

and this,


Next, here is the radical change in downwelling radiation at the surface from the increase in CO2 that is supposed to be driving the “CLIMATE EMERGENCY!!!” What I’ve shown is the change that in theory would have occurred from the changes in CO2 from 1750 to the present, and the change that in theory will occur in the future when CO2 increases from its present value to twice the 1750 value. This is using the generally accepted (although not rigorously derived) claim that the downwelling radiation change from a doubling of CO2 is 3.7 watts per square metre (W/m2). The purpose is to show how small these CO2-caused changes are compared to total downwelling radiation.

View attachment 938570

The changes in downwelling radiation from the increase in CO2 are trivially small, lost in the noise …

LINK

and this too showing that CO2 almost nothing left at the 400 ppm level and has been known since 1971 by published research.

3 Physicists Use Experimental Evidence To Show CO2’s Capacity To Absorb Radiation Has Saturated

LINK

================

You have been wrong for years now.

Shlt (human and livestock) is also good Fertilizer for greening should be also increase it 50%?



Royal Meteorological Society, 2019, CO2 had recently crossed 400 PPM in 2015)

The Pliocene: The Last Time Earth had >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2​

The last time carbon dioxide was so plentiful in our planet's atmosphere was in the Pliocene era, around 3 million years ago. Life on Earth was dominated by giant mammals; humans and chimps had shared their last common ancestor. Although the sun's force was about the Same, the sea levels were 15 Metres Higher and Arctic summer temperatures were 14 degrees higher than the present day."..."

The Pliocene: The Last Time Earth had >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2


It's up 1/3 since 1958.
Going gangbusters!)

`

 

[ding]

the Same, the sea levels were 15 Metres Higher and Arctic summer temperatures were 14 degrees higher than the present day."..."

And since it is cooler today with lower seas that ought to be your first clue that temperature is not a function of atmospheric CO2.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Actual predictions by climate science that have NOT failed

1) CO2 levels will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with fossil fuel usage
2) Global temperatures will continue to rise at unprecedented rates with CO2 levels.
3) There will be deleterious effects on the Earth's flora and fauna from the unprecedentedly rapid temperature increase.

You fools cannot deny these basics facts. God you fuckers are STUPID.

I noticed you ignored the link I posted which show actual predictions Faling badly, because your lying is stupid.

1) The planet loves the CO2 increase very much as it fosters increase biota growth which is good for us.

2) The planet loves a warmer world as it expands the food supply for herbivores and predators.

3) No, the plants love it heck even parts of the Sahara are greening up.



From NASA you have repeatedly ignored because you want to remain ignorant and stupid:

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK


====================


There have been a number of "climate scientists" who have made predictions that failed badly here is a link to a running list of predictions that have failed big time from the crop of AGW supporting scientists such as Zwally, Wadham, Belchen, Serreze, Maslowski, now they have gone very quiet as the decline stopped after 2007......

Ice Free Arctic Forecasts​

LINK

 

[Crick]

I noticed you ignored the link I posted which show actual predictions Faling badly, because your lying is stupid.

The lying is taking place on your side of this argument. This list of "predictions" include NOTHING from mainstream climate science. All of mine are.

1) The planet loves the CO2 increase very much as it fosters increase biota growth which is good for us.

The planet has no emotions. The Earth's environment is a very complex system and this oversimplification ignores enormous amounts of damage being caused directly and indirectly by the rapidly increasing temperatures we are producing with our unchecked CO2 and methane emissions.

2) The planet loves a warmer world as it expands the food supply for herbivores and predators.

The planet has no emotions. The rate of extinctions is hundreds if not thousands of times greater than the natural background rate and the vast majority are being caused by humans, many of those from the effects of global warming.

3) No, the plants love it heck even parts of the Sahara are greening up.

From NASA you have repeatedly ignored because you want to remain ignorant and stupid:

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK

Do you have any evidence that that greening has benefitted humans?

There have been a number of "climate scientists" who have made predictions that failed badly here is a link to a running list of predictions that have failed big time from the crop of AGW supporting scientists such as Zwally, Wadham, Belchen, Serreze, Maslowski, now they have gone very quiet as the decline stopped after 2007......

Ice Free Arctic Forecasts​

LINK

What decline stopped after 2007?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you have any evidence that that greening has benefitted humans?

No benefit to higher crop yields?

 

[Sunsettommy]

For Crick,

1) Crick has no evidence to offer that CO2 and CH4 is damaging plants of the world and that Methane/CO2 is now a negligible factor in todays heat budget.

2) Crick has no evidence to offer to show because it doesn't exist, here is the official INTERNATIONAL organization that tracks Extinctions worldwide,

There’s no sign of the fabled “Sixth Wave Of Extinctions”.

I showed you this before even posted the link to show how a big a liar you are as there are over a dozen published papers referred in the paper showing that extinction rate is not increasing and misleading as well.

Historical bird and terrestrial mammal extinction rates and causes​

LINK

3) Do you have any evidence that that greening has benefitted humans?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Here is a sample from the USDA LINK


Corn for grain production in 2023 was estimated at a record high 15.3 billion bushels, up 12 percent from the 2022 estimate. The average yield in the United States was estimated at a record high 177.3 bushels per acre, 3.9 bushels above the 2022 yield of 173.4 bushels per acre. Area harvested for grain was estimated at 86.5 million acres, up 10 percent from the 2022 estimate.

Sorghum: Grain production in 2023 was estimated at 318 million bushels, up 69 percent from the 2022 total. Planted area for 2023 was estimated at 7.20 million acres, up 14 percent from the previous year. Area harvested for grain, at 6.12 million acres, up 34 percent from 2022. Grain yield was estimated at 52.0 bushels per acre, up 10.9 bushels from 2022.

Rice: Production in 2023 totaled 218 million cwt, up 36 percent from the 2022 total. Planted area for 2022 was estimated at 2.89 million acres, up 30 percent from 2022. Area harvested, at 2.85 million acres, was up 32 percent from the previous crop year. The average yield for all United States rice was estimated at 7,649 pounds per acre, up 264 pounds from the 2022 average yield of 7,385 pounds per acre

4) What decline stopped after 2007?

LOL, you are so lazy as the well documented answer is in the link I provided this headline that was bolded and right in front of you,

Ice Free Arctic Forecasts​

I have already posted many times showing the decline stopped after 2007 but your renowned Swiss cheese memory bank doesn't allow you to keep up with reality.

 

[Crick]

For Crick,

1) Crick has no evidence to offer that CO2 and CH4 is damaging plants of the world and that Methane/CO2 is now a negligible factor in todays heat budget.

2) Crick has no evidence to offer to show because it doesn't exist, here is the official INTERNATIONAL organization that tracks Extinctions worldwide,

There’s no sign of the fabled “Sixth Wave Of Extinctions”.

View attachment 941521

I showed you this before even posted the link to show how a big a liar you are as there are over a dozen published papers referred in the paper showing that extinction rate is not increasing and misleading as well.

And I responded. This graphic IS NOT the product of the IUCN and can found in NO IUCN resource anywhere. This was procuced by someone named Wrightstone. IUCN data show nothing but massively increasing extinction rates for all categories of animals over this time span. You've been informed of this yet you still publish this graph. That makes you a WILLFUL LIAR.

Historical bird and terrestrial mammal extinction rates and causes​

LINK

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

This isn't from IUCN either.

Here is a sample from the USDA LINK

Corn for grain production in 2023 was estimated at a record high 15.3 billion bushels, up 12 percent from the 2022 estimate. The average yield in the United States was estimated at a record high 177.3 bushels per acre, 3.9 bushels above the 2022 yield of 173.4 bushels per acre. Area harvested for grain was estimated at 86.5 million acres, up 10 percent from the 2022 estimate.

Sorghum: Grain production in 2023 was estimated at 318 million bushels, up 69 percent from the 2022 total. Planted area for 2023 was estimated at 7.20 million acres, up 14 percent from the previous year. Area harvested for grain, at 6.12 million acres, up 34 percent from 2022. Grain yield was estimated at 52.0 bushels per acre, up 10.9 bushels from 2022.

Rice: Production in 2023 totaled 218 million cwt, up 36 percent from the 2022 total. Planted area for 2022 was estimated at 2.89 million acres, up 30 percent from 2022. Area harvested, at 2.85 million acres, was up 32 percent from the previous crop year. The average yield for all United States rice was estimated at 7,649 pounds per acre, up 264 pounds from the 2022 average yield of 7,385 pounds per acre

LOL, you are so lazy as the well documented answer is in the link I provided this headline that was bolded and right in front of you,

Where is this increase credited to atmospheric CO2 levels asshole?

Ice Free Arctic Forecasts​

I have already posted many times showing the decline stopped after 2007 but your renowned Swiss cheese memory bank doesn't allow you to keep up with reality.

Can we say "cherry-picked"?

PIOMAS northern sea ice volume

PIOMAS northern sea ice volume

gergs.net

Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 to 2020

Abstract. Ice losses from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have accelerated since the 1990s, accounting for a significant increase in the global mean sea level. Here, we present a new 29-year record of ice sheet mass balance from 1992 to 2020 from the Ice Sheet Mass Balance...

essd.copernicus.org

You are a stupid lying ratfuck.

 

[P@triot]

Facts matter…and when you get to the root of every problem, you find government was the cause.

The Good News about Climate Change | PragerU

Is climate change an existential crisis? Judith Curry, former Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology,…

www.prageru.com

 

[jc456]

View attachment 941581

Was the arctic ever ice free?

 

[P@triot]

You are a stupid lying ratfuck.

You’re so terrified by the propaganda you’ve consumed, that it has you completely off the sanity cliff.

In other words, it’s done exactly what it was designed to do. Sad.

 

[ReinyDays]

Was the arctic ever ice free?

Dinosaur fossils are found on Alaska's North Slope ≈ 100,000,000 million years ... and here I'm defining "ice free" as no ice at sea level year round ... every summer all the ice at sea level melts ... everywhere ... "Look at the bones, man, look at the bones" ...

IIRC the bottom of Greenland's ice is 30 millions years old ... because before then all the ice melted every year ...

I think what important is that IF there is at least an ice-free passage way, we'll need to invade Canada so we can control it ... burn tires and mobilize the Army ... Manifest Trump'stiny

 

[Crick]

Dinosaur fossils are found on Alaska's North Slope ≈ 100,000,000 million years ...

One hundred quadrillion years? I hope that was just being dramatic.

and here I'm defining "ice free" as no ice at sea level year round ... every summer all the ice at sea level melts ... everywhere ... "Look at the bones, man, look at the bones" ...

IIRC the bottom of Greenland's ice is 30 millions years old ... because before then all the ice melted every year ...

The bottom of Greenland's ice is 3 million years old at most.

"The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, confirms that the Greenland Ice Sheet melted and the island greened during a warm period likely within the last million years"

https://lamont.columbia.edu/news/ancient-plant-insect-bits-confirm-greenland-melted-recent-geologic-past#:~:text=A%20team%20of%20scientists%20reexamined,poppy%20seed%20in%20pristine%20condition.

"The new study makes clear that the deep ice at Camp Century -- some 75 miles inland from the coast and only 800 miles from the North Pole -- entirely melted at least once within the last million years"

Scientists stunned to discover plants beneath mile-deep Greenland ice

Scientists found frozen plant fossils, preserved under a mile of ice on Greenland. The discovery helps confirm a new and troubling understanding that the Greenland Ice Sheet has melted entirely during recent warm periods in Earth's history -- like the one we are now creating with human-caused...

www.sciencedaily.com

 

[jc456]

One hundred quadrillion years? I hope that was just being dramatic.

it proves that ice didn't exist. You are suggesting ice is needed. Why?

The bottom of Greenland's ice is 3 million years old at most.

so there is a base and it too was ice free. Why do you need it to have ice?

"The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, confirms that the Greenland Ice Sheet melted and the island greened during a warm period likely within the last million years"

blows your nonsense up!