🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The devastating bombshell which exposes liberals

P@triot

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2011
61,483
11,680
2,060
United States
Once again we see liberals reject their own position once that position affects them. This is grossly despicable and summarizes just how disgusting the liberal position - with all of its appalling hypocrisy - really is....

Media Matters rejects the “myth” that “unions reduce business competitiveness.” Unions “can increase individual firms’ productivity,” in fact, they say – apparently so long as that firm is not Media Matters.

The liberal outfit’s staff recently requested representation by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). But Media Matter’s management did not exactly welcome this prospective productivity boost with open arms. Instead of recognizing the union, Media Matters insisted on a secret-ballot election. An election that it intends to fight, having retained the services of Perkins Coie, a noted management-side law firm.

MMFAs employees released a statement expressing their disappointment:
The actions of Media Matters executives have placed employees in the impossible position of continuing to produce content espousing pro-labor values for an employer who is challenging our right to unionize. Not only is management subjecting Media Matters employees to arduous NLRB procedures, the actions of their attorneys indicate Media Matters executives object so tenaciously to our union that they appear willing to prevent employees from ever having the opportunity to vote on the matter.

Add Media Matters to the long list of liberals who want employers to do as they say, not as they do:

Salon routinely criticizes companies that offer unpaid internships. It also offers unpaid internships at Salon.

Union stalwart and former congressman David Bonior (D., Mich.) fought strenuously to raise the minimum wage. Now that he runs two restaurants where he only pays his (non-union) workers the tip wage of $2.36 an hour (they make more after tips).

Media Matters: Do as We Say, Not as We Do
 
And to think of all the liberals who turn to Media Matters as their "trusted" source... :lmao:

This proves once and for all what a farce all of these liberal organizations are
 
The whole of the entire dimocrap party is corrupt.

Especially it's supporters.

Top to bottom, inside and out -- They're scumbags. ALL of them.
 
Once again we see liberals reject their own position once that position affects them. This is grossly despicable and summarizes just how disgusting the liberal position - with all of its appalling hypocrisy - really is....

Media Matters rejects the “myth” that “unions reduce business competitiveness.” Unions “can increase individual firms’ productivity,” in fact, they say – apparently so long as that firm is not Media Matters.

The liberal outfit’s staff recently requested representation by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). But Media Matter’s management did not exactly welcome this prospective productivity boost with open arms. Instead of recognizing the union, Media Matters insisted on a secret-ballot election. An election that it intends to fight, having retained the services of Perkins Coie, a noted management-side law firm.

MMFAs employees released a statement expressing their disappointment:
The actions of Media Matters executives have placed employees in the impossible position of continuing to produce content espousing pro-labor values for an employer who is challenging our right to unionize. Not only is management subjecting Media Matters employees to arduous NLRB procedures, the actions of their attorneys indicate Media Matters executives object so tenaciously to our union that they appear willing to prevent employees from ever having the opportunity to vote on the matter.

Add Media Matters to the long list of liberals who want employers to do as they say, not as they do:

Salon routinely criticizes companies that offer unpaid internships. It also offers unpaid internships at Salon.

Union stalwart and former congressman David Bonior (D., Mich.) fought strenuously to raise the minimum wage. Now that he runs two restaurants where he only pays his (non-union) workers the tip wage of $2.36 an hour (they make more after tips).

Media Matters: Do as We Say, Not as We Do

that is some funny stuff there

--LOL
 
Why would a media corporation have to follow all of the practices that might be advocated in its editorial content?

I'll bet most conservative media outlets that do anti-union stories on a regular basis have unionized people working for them.
 
Why would a media corporation have to follow all of the practices that might be advocated in its editorial content?

I'll bet most conservative media outlets that do anti-union stories on a regular basis have unionized people working for them.



good one stupid; now why dont you analyze what you just said?

why would union people want to work for an outfit that is in your opinion so hostile to unions?

maybe you're just too stupid; or brainwashed, to admit there can be legitimate gripes against unions and their thug representatives in America?
 
Why would a media corporation have to follow all of the practices that might be advocated in its editorial content?

I'll bet most conservative media outlets that do anti-union stories on a regular basis have unionized people working for them.

:rolleyes:

repeat....The actions of Media Matters executives have placed employees in the impossible position of continuing to produce content espousing pro-labor values for an employer who is challenging our right to unionize.
 
not only is Media Matters oppposed to unionizing; but incredibly so was ACORN; which was founded by two guys who were big shots in the SEIU; a huge union.


ACORN employess had to SUE THE LEADERS OF ACORN TO PAY OVERTIME; for workers who did outreach on the streets; often in sub-zero weather in places like Wisconsin and Michigan

libs are:

idiots and hypocrites
 
Why would a media corporation have to follow all of the practices that might be advocated in its editorial content?

I'll bet most conservative media outlets that do anti-union stories on a regular basis have unionized people working for them.

:rolleyes:

repeat....The actions of Media Matters executives have placed employees in the impossible position of continuing to produce content espousing pro-labor values for an employer who is challenging our right to unionize.

they arnt challenging their right they only want them to follow the law --LOL
 
not only is Media Matters oppposed to unionizing; but incredibly so was ACORN; which was founded by two guys who were big shots in the SEIU; a huge union.


ACORN employess had to SUE THE LEADERS OF ACORN TO PAY OVERTIME; for workers who did outreach on the streets; often in sub-zero weather in places like Wisconsin and Michigan

libs are:

idiots and hypocrites

Are you really still wondering how you get the "stupid" label so often?

It was California Regulators that sued ACORN, not a union.
 
Why would a media corporation have to follow all of the practices that might be advocated in its editorial content?

I'll bet most conservative media outlets that do anti-union stories on a regular basis have unionized people working for them.

:rolleyes:

repeat....The actions of Media Matters executives have placed employees in the impossible position of continuing to produce content espousing pro-labor values for an employer who is challenging our right to unionize.

I guess you people can't summarily reject Media Matters as a biased liberal source then, if it's not run by liberals.
 
Liberals love making rules for others. Do business with a liberal and you will soon find out that they don't like to practice what they preach.
 
Why would a media corporation have to follow all of the practices that might be advocated in its editorial content?

I'll bet most conservative media outlets that do anti-union stories on a regular basis have unionized people working for them.

:rolleyes:

repeat....The actions of Media Matters executives have placed employees in the impossible position of continuing to produce content espousing pro-labor values for an employer who is challenging our right to unionize.

I guess you people can't summarily reject Media Matters as a biased liberal source then, if it's not run by liberals.
Sheryl Atkinson says they are and made a personal (and professional) decision to no longer be part of it. Her word against yours.
 
That's it? That's the "bombshell"?

An organization which puts out content stating that unions do not harm business is refusing to allow their own employees to unionize.

So yeah, it proves (once again) that the left lives the motto "socialism is for the people, not the socialist".

Just like you and SeaWytch won't help your fellow man (but demand that government place a gun to my head and force me to help), Media Matters disseminates pro-union propaganda but then fights when their own employees want to unionize.
 
Why would a media corporation have to follow all of the practices that might be advocated in its editorial content?

I'll bet most conservative media outlets that do anti-union stories on a regular basis have unionized people working for them.

:rolleyes:

repeat....The actions of Media Matters executives have placed employees in the impossible position of continuing to produce content espousing pro-labor values for an employer who is challenging our right to unionize.

I guess you people can't summarily reject Media Matters as a biased liberal source then, if it's not run by liberals.

Wrong guess

What we have here is the liberal elites lying to the liberal lemmings and the subsequent whining liberals do when they find out they've been tools but refuse to see the forest for the trees
 

Well duh! This is humiliating for them and ruins ALL credibility. Of course they are going to back-track now and proclaim they are "not opposed". But if they weren't opposed, they wouldn't have taken the action they did to prevent unionization.

Why did they assist their employees rather than seeking assistance from a law firm known for being anti-union, pro-management?
 

Forum List

Back
Top