The election is over so why is social media still banning/deleting posts they deem wrong?

[Indeependent]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Fake News deserves to be treated like Fake News

I guess CNN is out of business!

 

[Skylar]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Jesus... then don’t use them!! If they don’t want porn on their sites then thats their call. If they don’t want beheadings on their sites then fine. If they don’t want people posting fake/misleading videos that undermine an election then that is also their call. Don’t like it? Then go somewhere else. I’m sure trumps site will be up in a couple months. You can slurp up all the lies that you want there.

Man, that sounds awfully familiar. They are the same arguments supporters of those bakers used when they were shouted at about public accommodation.

Exactly the same arguments. Flaming hypocrites on both sides. With the exception of tiny handful of genuine libertarians, pretty much everyone sees the government as a way to get one over on the other guy.

If liberals started spewing anti-vac disinfo, I'd have the same reaction.

And I'm a pretty firm believer in a company being able to set its own terms of service. If I was banned from this board, for example, I'd probably be a little bummed. But it belongs to someone else and they set the rules.

 

[Skylar]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Fake News deserves to be treated like Fake News

I guess CNN is out of business!

CNN managed to relay the election results in a far more accurate way than say.....OAN, NewsMax or that occultist youtube conspiracy theorist that told you what to think for weeks.

 

[candycorn]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

We had a meeting. Its being done just to make you upset.

Either that or the fact that your blob continues to suggest there was cheating undermines American's faith in the elections and there are some contests still going on in the form of run-offs....so it's not over dumbass.

 

[colfax_m]

IMO, if you can't treat them like a publisher, they should not be censoring content. They should not receive, for example, protection from liability if a liberal hater doxes a conservative and his children die in a house fire while simultaneously being free to censor that conservative's expression of his views.

You can have that opinion but that leads to unintended consequences.

See, what you’re suggesting is exactly what we had back in the day, in the 1990s. There would be forums and they would be moderated so when objectionable content gets posted, they’d take it down. Well, the courts then made them liable for everything posted on their sites. So either you’d have to leave up everything on the website no matter how objectionable, or be responsible for the content of every person.

And that was not a situation that could be sustained.

It's not an ideal world and compromises must be made. I understand that.

I’d rather a few

IMO, if you can't treat them like a publisher, they should not be censoring content. They should not receive, for example, protection from liability if a liberal hater doxes a conservative and his children die in a house fire while simultaneously being free to censor that conservative's expression of his views.

You can have that opinion but that leads to unintended consequences.

See, what you’re suggesting is exactly what we had back in the day, in the 1990s. There would be forums and they would be moderated so when objectionable content gets posted, they’d take it down. Well, the courts then made them liable for everything posted on their sites. So either you’d have to leave up everything on the website no matter how objectionable, or be responsible for the content of every person.

And that was not a situation that could be sustained.

It could not be "sustained" only if Dim douchebags wanted to retain power. They can't tolerate people speaking the truth.

The truth is you are a bunch of thugs with no respect for private property.

Stand on a street corner and spout your nonsense. You have my full support. Demand that someone do it for you, then go to hell.

Public accommodation laws really need to be worked out with regards to social media. It is not right that a person can be denied access to a publicly offered service based on the opinions he/she expresses.

Some opinions are rather deplorable. You need to be careful about what you wish for.

 

[OldLady]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

It's because according to the President, this election isn't over.

 

[rightwinger]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Fake News deserves to be treated like Fake News

I guess CNN is out of business!

CNN correctly called the election over four weeks ago.
Those who refused to are obviously fake

 

[dblack]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Jesus... then don’t use them!! If they don’t want porn on their sites then thats their call. If they don’t want beheadings on their sites then fine. If they don’t want people posting fake/misleading videos that undermine an election then that is also their call. Don’t like it? Then go somewhere else. I’m sure trumps site will be up in a couple months. You can slurp up all the lies that you want there.

Man, that sounds awfully familiar. They are the same arguments supporters of those bakers used when they were shouted at about public accommodation.

Exactly the same arguments. Flaming hypocrites on both sides. With the exception of tiny handful of genuine libertarians, pretty much everyone sees the government as a way to get one over on the other guy.

If liberals started spewing anti-vac disinfo, I'd have the same reaction.

And I'm a pretty firm believer in a company being able to set its own terms of service. If I was banned from this board, for example, I'd probably be a little bummed. But it belongs to someone else and they set the rules.

And are you a firm believer in a baker's right to do likewise?

 

[Skylar]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Jesus... then don’t use them!! If they don’t want porn on their sites then thats their call. If they don’t want beheadings on their sites then fine. If they don’t want people posting fake/misleading videos that undermine an election then that is also their call. Don’t like it? Then go somewhere else. I’m sure trumps site will be up in a couple months. You can slurp up all the lies that you want there.

Man, that sounds awfully familiar. They are the same arguments supporters of those bakers used when they were shouted at about public accommodation.

Exactly the same arguments. Flaming hypocrites on both sides. With the exception of tiny handful of genuine libertarians, pretty much everyone sees the government as a way to get one over on the other guy.

If liberals started spewing anti-vac disinfo, I'd have the same reaction.

And I'm a pretty firm believer in a company being able to set its own terms of service. If I was banned from this board, for example, I'd probably be a little bummed. But it belongs to someone else and they set the rules.

And are you a firm believer in a baker's right to do likewise?

That's a fair point. I'll need to chew on that.

 

[colfax_m]

Whats the goal here?

They don’t want to be a hotbed of conspiratorial nonsense.

You mean they want to suppress opinions and information they disagree with.

Who do you think you're fooling?

I mean that they are a business and advertisers don’t like their ads appearing on the pages of lunatics.

There are plenty of advertisers what would love to have their ads posted on rightwing pages.

You idiots kill me when you display your naked hatred for freedom of speech.

Why do you call yourselves "liberal" or "progressive?" Stalinists is what you are.

Not enough to pay the bills for the torrent of bullshit you lunatics put in the internet.

We are talking about massive companies, not stupid little right wing blogs.

The hatred of freedom comes from you thugs who demand social media do as you say.

Yeah, right. Censorship means freedom. War is peace.

Freedom of speech costs nothing. Censorship is what requires massive armies of Stalinist douchebags.

You're the lowest bucket of piss in the universe.

But you’re forgetting that this “censorship” isn’t occurring in the public sphere. It’s not occurring on government property.

It’s occurring on private servers paid for by private money. You are a thug trying to tell people what to do with their property. Because you know what? Running a massive website isn’t actually free!

It's occuring with government protection, scumbag. The cost of lawyers isn't free when the government isn't protecting you from lawsuits.

No one needs government to protect them from the consequences of chucking you lunatics off their property. That’s their constitutional right to do so.

The you should support terminating Section 230. Why are you fighting so hard to defend it?

Because the internet would be a steaming pile of shit without it.

You lunatics would burn it all down.

YEs, I imagine from the point of view of a bootlicking Stalinist dirtbag, it would be a pile of shit. However, now it's a pile of shit for anyone who isn't a brainwashed minion of the deep state.

The Stalinist is the one who wants to force private individuals to do to your bidding.

I have no intention of forcing them to do my bidding. I just don't want them protected from lawsuits while they persecute half the population of this country.

I don’t want to force them to do my bidding. I just want to sue them. To do my bidding.

Idiot.

 

[bripat9643]

Whats the goal here?

They don’t want to be a hotbed of conspiratorial nonsense.

You mean they want to suppress opinions and information they disagree with.

Who do you think you're fooling?

I mean that they are a business and advertisers don’t like their ads appearing on the pages of lunatics.

There are plenty of advertisers what would love to have their ads posted on rightwing pages.

You idiots kill me when you display your naked hatred for freedom of speech.

Why do you call yourselves "liberal" or "progressive?" Stalinists is what you are.

Not enough to pay the bills for the torrent of bullshit you lunatics put in the internet.

We are talking about massive companies, not stupid little right wing blogs.

The hatred of freedom comes from you thugs who demand social media do as you say.

Yeah, right. Censorship means freedom. War is peace.

Freedom of speech costs nothing. Censorship is what requires massive armies of Stalinist douchebags.

You're the lowest bucket of piss in the universe.

But you’re forgetting that this “censorship” isn’t occurring in the public sphere. It’s not occurring on government property.

It’s occurring on private servers paid for by private money. You are a thug trying to tell people what to do with their property. Because you know what? Running a massive website isn’t actually free!

It's occuring with government protection, scumbag. The cost of lawyers isn't free when the government isn't protecting you from lawsuits.

No one needs government to protect them from the consequences of chucking you lunatics off their property. That’s their constitutional right to do so.

The you should support terminating Section 230. Why are you fighting so hard to defend it?

Because the internet would be a steaming pile of shit without it.

You lunatics would burn it all down.

YEs, I imagine from the point of view of a bootlicking Stalinist dirtbag, it would be a pile of shit. However, now it's a pile of shit for anyone who isn't a brainwashed minion of the deep state.

The Stalinist is the one who wants to force private individuals to do to your bidding.

I have no intention of forcing them to do my bidding. I just don't want them protected from lawsuits while they persecute half the population of this country.

That argument is completely fake. You all are pissed off at Facebook and Twitter because they're flagging your posts for the bullshit they are, and you want big daddy government to punish them. Same old statist crap - using the government to bully people you don't like.

But, I know, it's different when you do it.

Anyone who wants some mega corporation deciding what the truth is identifies himself as a Stalinist. It's utterly hilarious how Trump hating turds believe censorship is a form of freedom.

 

[bripat9643]

Whats the goal here?

They don’t want to be a hotbed of conspiratorial nonsense.

You mean they want to suppress opinions and information they disagree with.

Who do you think you're fooling?

I mean that they are a business and advertisers don’t like their ads appearing on the pages of lunatics.

There are plenty of advertisers what would love to have their ads posted on rightwing pages.

You idiots kill me when you display your naked hatred for freedom of speech.

Why do you call yourselves "liberal" or "progressive?" Stalinists is what you are.

Not enough to pay the bills for the torrent of bullshit you lunatics put in the internet.

We are talking about massive companies, not stupid little right wing blogs.

The hatred of freedom comes from you thugs who demand social media do as you say.

Yeah, right. Censorship means freedom. War is peace.

Freedom of speech costs nothing. Censorship is what requires massive armies of Stalinist douchebags.

You're the lowest bucket of piss in the universe.

But you’re forgetting that this “censorship” isn’t occurring in the public sphere. It’s not occurring on government property.

It’s occurring on private servers paid for by private money. You are a thug trying to tell people what to do with their property. Because you know what? Running a massive website isn’t actually free!

It's occuring with government protection, scumbag. The cost of lawyers isn't free when the government isn't protecting you from lawsuits.

No one needs government to protect them from the consequences of chucking you lunatics off their property. That’s their constitutional right to do so.

The you should support terminating Section 230. Why are you fighting so hard to defend it?

Because the internet would be a steaming pile of shit without it.

You lunatics would burn it all down.

YEs, I imagine from the point of view of a bootlicking Stalinist dirtbag, it would be a pile of shit. However, now it's a pile of shit for anyone who isn't a brainwashed minion of the deep state.

The Stalinist is the one who wants to force private individuals to do to your bidding.

I have no intention of forcing them to do my bidding. I just don't want them protected from lawsuits while they persecute half the population of this country.

I don’t want to force them to do my bidding. I just want to sue them. To do my bidding.

Idiot.

That's the American way, asshole.

 

[bripat9643]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Jesus... then don’t use them!! If they don’t want porn on their sites then thats their call. If they don’t want beheadings on their sites then fine. If they don’t want people posting fake/misleading videos that undermine an election then that is also their call. Don’t like it? Then go somewhere else. I’m sure trumps site will be up in a couple months. You can slurp up all the lies that you want there.

Man, that sounds awfully familiar. They are the same arguments supporters of those bakers used when they were shouted at about public accommodation.

Exactly the same arguments. Flaming hypocrites on both sides. With the exception of tiny handful of genuine libertarians, pretty much everyone sees the government as a way to get one over on the other guy.

You're just another Trump hating asshole. "Libertarian" my ass.

 

[dblack]

Whats the goal here?

They don’t want to be a hotbed of conspiratorial nonsense.

You mean they want to suppress opinions and information they disagree with.

Who do you think you're fooling?

I mean that they are a business and advertisers don’t like their ads appearing on the pages of lunatics.

There are plenty of advertisers what would love to have their ads posted on rightwing pages.

You idiots kill me when you display your naked hatred for freedom of speech.

Why do you call yourselves "liberal" or "progressive?" Stalinists is what you are.

Not enough to pay the bills for the torrent of bullshit you lunatics put in the internet.

We are talking about massive companies, not stupid little right wing blogs.

The hatred of freedom comes from you thugs who demand social media do as you say.

Yeah, right. Censorship means freedom. War is peace.

Freedom of speech costs nothing. Censorship is what requires massive armies of Stalinist douchebags.

You're the lowest bucket of piss in the universe.

But you’re forgetting that this “censorship” isn’t occurring in the public sphere. It’s not occurring on government property.

It’s occurring on private servers paid for by private money. You are a thug trying to tell people what to do with their property. Because you know what? Running a massive website isn’t actually free!

It's occuring with government protection, scumbag. The cost of lawyers isn't free when the government isn't protecting you from lawsuits.

No one needs government to protect them from the consequences of chucking you lunatics off their property. That’s their constitutional right to do so.

The you should support terminating Section 230. Why are you fighting so hard to defend it?

Because the internet would be a steaming pile of shit without it.

You lunatics would burn it all down.

YEs, I imagine from the point of view of a bootlicking Stalinist dirtbag, it would be a pile of shit. However, now it's a pile of shit for anyone who isn't a brainwashed minion of the deep state.

The Stalinist is the one who wants to force private individuals to do to your bidding.

I have no intention of forcing them to do my bidding. I just don't want them protected from lawsuits while they persecute half the population of this country.

That argument is completely fake. You all are pissed off at Facebook and Twitter because they're flagging your posts for the bullshit they are, and you want big daddy government to punish them. Same old statist crap - using the government to bully people you don't like.

But, I know, it's different when you do it.

Anyone who wants some mega corporation deciding what the truth is identifies himself as a Stalinist. It's utterly hilarious how Trump hating turds believe censorship is a form of freedom.

Uh - no. Stalinists use government to force their will on others. Anyone who thinks that corporations have the power to decide things for us, has no. fucking. clue. what a free market is.

 

[Skylar]

Whats the goal here?

They don’t want to be a hotbed of conspiratorial nonsense.

You mean they want to suppress opinions and information they disagree with.

Who do you think you're fooling?

I mean that they are a business and advertisers don’t like their ads appearing on the pages of lunatics.

There are plenty of advertisers what would love to have their ads posted on rightwing pages.

You idiots kill me when you display your naked hatred for freedom of speech.

Why do you call yourselves "liberal" or "progressive?" Stalinists is what you are.

Not enough to pay the bills for the torrent of bullshit you lunatics put in the internet.

We are talking about massive companies, not stupid little right wing blogs.

The hatred of freedom comes from you thugs who demand social media do as you say.

Yeah, right. Censorship means freedom. War is peace.

Freedom of speech costs nothing. Censorship is what requires massive armies of Stalinist douchebags.

You're the lowest bucket of piss in the universe.

But you’re forgetting that this “censorship” isn’t occurring in the public sphere. It’s not occurring on government property.

It’s occurring on private servers paid for by private money. You are a thug trying to tell people what to do with their property. Because you know what? Running a massive website isn’t actually free!

It's occuring with government protection, scumbag. The cost of lawyers isn't free when the government isn't protecting you from lawsuits.

No one needs government to protect them from the consequences of chucking you lunatics off their property. That’s their constitutional right to do so.

The you should support terminating Section 230. Why are you fighting so hard to defend it?

Because the internet would be a steaming pile of shit without it.

You lunatics would burn it all down.

YEs, I imagine from the point of view of a bootlicking Stalinist dirtbag, it would be a pile of shit. However, now it's a pile of shit for anyone who isn't a brainwashed minion of the deep state.

The Stalinist is the one who wants to force private individuals to do to your bidding.

I have no intention of forcing them to do my bidding. I just don't want them protected from lawsuits while they persecute half the population of this country.

That argument is completely fake. You all are pissed off at Facebook and Twitter because they're flagging your posts for the bullshit they are, and you want big daddy government to punish them. Same old statist crap - using the government to bully people you don't like.

But, I know, it's different when you do it.

Anyone who wants some mega corporation deciding what the truth is identifies himself as a Stalinist. It's utterly hilarious how Trump hating turds believe censorship is a form of freedom.

You can decide 'truth'. Just not on someone else's website.

By your logic I can stroll into your living room, spray paint 'President-Elect Biden Wins Again!' on the wall and you can neither stop me nor ever take it down or cover it up.....else you're a 'Stalinist'.

You simply have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[dblack]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Jesus... then don’t use them!! If they don’t want porn on their sites then thats their call. If they don’t want beheadings on their sites then fine. If they don’t want people posting fake/misleading videos that undermine an election then that is also their call. Don’t like it? Then go somewhere else. I’m sure trumps site will be up in a couple months. You can slurp up all the lies that you want there.

Man, that sounds awfully familiar. They are the same arguments supporters of those bakers used when they were shouted at about public accommodation.

Exactly the same arguments. Flaming hypocrites on both sides. With the exception of tiny handful of genuine libertarians, pretty much everyone sees the government as a way to get one over on the other guy.

You're just another Trump hating asshole. "Libertarian" my ass.

No, your ass isn't libertarian either.

 

[colfax_m]

Whats the goal here?

They don’t want to be a hotbed of conspiratorial nonsense.

You mean they want to suppress opinions and information they disagree with.

Who do you think you're fooling?

I mean that they are a business and advertisers don’t like their ads appearing on the pages of lunatics.

There are plenty of advertisers what would love to have their ads posted on rightwing pages.

You idiots kill me when you display your naked hatred for freedom of speech.

Why do you call yourselves "liberal" or "progressive?" Stalinists is what you are.

Not enough to pay the bills for the torrent of bullshit you lunatics put in the internet.

We are talking about massive companies, not stupid little right wing blogs.

The hatred of freedom comes from you thugs who demand social media do as you say.

Yeah, right. Censorship means freedom. War is peace.

Freedom of speech costs nothing. Censorship is what requires massive armies of Stalinist douchebags.

You're the lowest bucket of piss in the universe.

But you’re forgetting that this “censorship” isn’t occurring in the public sphere. It’s not occurring on government property.

It’s occurring on private servers paid for by private money. You are a thug trying to tell people what to do with their property. Because you know what? Running a massive website isn’t actually free!

It's occuring with government protection, scumbag. The cost of lawyers isn't free when the government isn't protecting you from lawsuits.

No one needs government to protect them from the consequences of chucking you lunatics off their property. That’s their constitutional right to do so.

The you should support terminating Section 230. Why are you fighting so hard to defend it?

Because the internet would be a steaming pile of shit without it.

You lunatics would burn it all down.

YEs, I imagine from the point of view of a bootlicking Stalinist dirtbag, it would be a pile of shit. However, now it's a pile of shit for anyone who isn't a brainwashed minion of the deep state.

The Stalinist is the one who wants to force private individuals to do to your bidding.

I have no intention of forcing them to do my bidding. I just don't want them protected from lawsuits while they persecute half the population of this country.

That argument is completely fake. You all are pissed off at Facebook and Twitter because they're flagging your posts for the bullshit they are, and you want big daddy government to punish them. Same old statist crap - using the government to bully people you don't like.

But, I know, it's different when you do it.

Anyone who wants some mega corporation deciding what the truth is identifies himself as a Stalinist. It's utterly hilarious how Trump hating turds believe censorship is a form of freedom.

I decide what is truth. None of these websites has any ability to decide that for me.

It’s utterly hilarious how you lunatics think forcing people to do your bidding is freedom.

 

[bripat9643]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Jesus... then don’t use them!! If they don’t want porn on their sites then thats their call. If they don’t want beheadings on their sites then fine. If they don’t want people posting fake/misleading videos that undermine an election then that is also their call. Don’t like it? Then go somewhere else. I’m sure trumps site will be up in a couple months. You can slurp up all the lies that you want there.

If they don't want to be sued, then quit slandering their customers and destroying their livelyhoods.

 

[colfax_m]

Whats the goal here?

They don’t want to be a hotbed of conspiratorial nonsense.

You mean they want to suppress opinions and information they disagree with.

Who do you think you're fooling?

I mean that they are a business and advertisers don’t like their ads appearing on the pages of lunatics.

There are plenty of advertisers what would love to have their ads posted on rightwing pages.

You idiots kill me when you display your naked hatred for freedom of speech.

Why do you call yourselves "liberal" or "progressive?" Stalinists is what you are.

Not enough to pay the bills for the torrent of bullshit you lunatics put in the internet.

We are talking about massive companies, not stupid little right wing blogs.

The hatred of freedom comes from you thugs who demand social media do as you say.

Yeah, right. Censorship means freedom. War is peace.

Freedom of speech costs nothing. Censorship is what requires massive armies of Stalinist douchebags.

You're the lowest bucket of piss in the universe.

But you’re forgetting that this “censorship” isn’t occurring in the public sphere. It’s not occurring on government property.

It’s occurring on private servers paid for by private money. You are a thug trying to tell people what to do with their property. Because you know what? Running a massive website isn’t actually free!

It's occuring with government protection, scumbag. The cost of lawyers isn't free when the government isn't protecting you from lawsuits.

No one needs government to protect them from the consequences of chucking you lunatics off their property. That’s their constitutional right to do so.

The you should support terminating Section 230. Why are you fighting so hard to defend it?

Because the internet would be a steaming pile of shit without it.

You lunatics would burn it all down.

YEs, I imagine from the point of view of a bootlicking Stalinist dirtbag, it would be a pile of shit. However, now it's a pile of shit for anyone who isn't a brainwashed minion of the deep state.

The Stalinist is the one who wants to force private individuals to do to your bidding.

I have no intention of forcing them to do my bidding. I just don't want them protected from lawsuits while they persecute half the population of this country.

I don’t want to force them to do my bidding. I just want to sue them. To do my bidding.

Idiot.

That's the American way, asshole.

It’s not. It’s you being an authoritarian thug.

America stands for freedom. Not you pathetic losers whining because you can’t post on Facebook.

 

[bripat9643]

Whats the goal here?

Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?

Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?

Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Seriously can't say this loud enough....

FUCK THESE COMPANIES!

Jesus... then don’t use them!! If they don’t want porn on their sites then thats their call. If they don’t want beheadings on their sites then fine. If they don’t want people posting fake/misleading videos that undermine an election then that is also their call. Don’t like it? Then go somewhere else. I’m sure trumps site will be up in a couple months. You can slurp up all the lies that you want there.

Man, that sounds awfully familiar. They are the same arguments supporters of those bakers used when they were shouted at about public accommodation.

Exactly the same arguments. Flaming hypocrites on both sides. With the exception of tiny handful of genuine libertarians, pretty much everyone sees the government as a way to get one over on the other guy.

You're just another Trump hating asshole. "Libertarian" my ass.

No, your ass isn't libertarian either.

It sure as hell is.