The EVIDENCE is simple. If you are counting mail-in ballots LAST instead of FIRST, it is FRAUD

[Care4all]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

trump did not cripple the PO.....the PO's problems are of their own making...

Well it went from 90-95% delivery of First class mail within 5 days down to 65% delivery in 5 days in some places in Detroit and other big cities, AFTER DeJoys changes he made in early July, or June.

The PO may have had problems, but he made it worse....

 

[Care4all]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

trump did not cripple the PO.....the PO's problems are of their own making...

Well it went from 90-95% delivery of First class mail within 5 days down to 65% delivery in 5 days in some places in Detroit and other big cities, AFTER DeJoys changes he made in early July, or June.

The PO may have had problems, but he made it worse....

more info:

The independent government watchdog for the United States Postal Service has concluded that a sweeping series of operational changes implemented at the agency by President Donald Trump’s postmaster general “negatively impacted the quality and timeliness of mail delivery” across the country.

In a report released this week in response to various congressional requests, the USPS Office of Inspector General analyzed the cost-cutting measures Postmaster General Louis DeJoy put in place after assuming control of the agency in June — as well as the nearly six dozen strategies initiated by USPS operations executives to achieve financial targets.


The inspector general found that USPS officials did not conduct any analysis of the service effects of their changes, and that “documentation and guidance to the field” regarding the new policies “was very limited and almost exclusively oral.”


“The resulting confusion and inconsistency in operations at postal facilities compounded the significant negative service impacts across the country,” the inspector general wrote.

In addition, the inspector general found that the documentation of the operational changes provided by USPS officials to customers and congressional lawmakers “was generally accurate but incomplete.”

The “collective results” of the changes by DeJoy and USPS executives, “combined with the ongoing employee availability challenges resulting from” the coronavirus pandemic, “negatively impacted the quality and timeliness of mail delivery nationally,” the inspector general wrote.

The inspector general also found that the agency’s “mail service performance significantly dropped beginning in July 2020, directly corresponding to implementation of the operational changes and initiatives.”

DeJoy, a former businessman and Republican megadonor, was tapped to lead the cash-strapped USPS this summer as the White House escalated its unsubstantiated attacks on mail-in voting — provoking widespread criticism of DeJoy’s organizational restructuring at the agency.

READ MORE

Government watchdog knocks Postal Service for operational changes

An inspector general report criticized the cost-cutting initiatives by Louis DeJoy and agency executives.

www.politico.com

 

[BULLDOG]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

trump did not cripple the PO.....the PO's problems are of their own making...

Trump recently named one of his major fundraisers, who had no experience with anything remotely associated with the post office, as postmaster general. He's the one who crippled the PO

 

[Harry Dresden]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

trump did not cripple the PO.....the PO's problems are of their own making...

Well it went from 90-95% delivery of First class mail within 5 days down to 65% delivery in 5 days in some places in Detroit and other big cities, AFTER DeJoys changes he made in early July, or June.

The PO may have had problems, but he made it worse....

what i read it went down to 85%......and all those changes have been going on for years.....especially the OT situation.....trump and the democrats have blown this up way more than what it is...

 

[Harry Dresden]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

trump did not cripple the PO.....the PO's problems are of their own making...

Trump recently named one of his major fundraisers, who had no experience with anything remotely associated with the post office, as postmaster general. He's the one who crippled the PO

do you know how many PMG's have been appointed over the years that have zero experience with the Post Office?...and who tried implementing policies that crippled the place because they thought they were helping curb overtime and speeding up the mail?......under the 8 i worked under 5 were not postal people....

 

[g5000]

please discuss

Nope. Try again.

 

[AntonToo]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

How the hell does it "retain integrity" and how do you explain REPUBLICANS blocking counting mail-ins first in places like PA.

 

[Care4all]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

trump did not cripple the PO.....the PO's problems are of their own making...

Well it went from 90-95% delivery of First class mail within 5 days down to 65% delivery in 5 days in some places in Detroit and other big cities, AFTER DeJoys changes he made in early July, or June.

The PO may have had problems, but he made it worse....

what i read it went down to 85%......and all those changes have been going on for years.....especially the OT situation.....trump and the democrats have blown this up way more than what it is...

Harry...more info on it....Detroit ran 15% lower, than usps national average....

Detroit mail delivery slowest in nation, USPS data shows

The United States Postal Service (USPS) released new data that ranks Detroit’s postal delivery in last place, raising concerns about the effect that delivery delays could have on the presidential election just 10 days away.

www.clickondetroit.com

DETROIT – The United States Postal Service (USPS) released new data that ranks Detroit’s postal delivery in last place, raising concerns about the effect that delivery delays could have on the presidential election just 10 days away.

The data was released due to a federal court order and was part of a new report on USPS performance released by Sen. Gary Peters, who has been investigating USPS delivery delays since July. Peters serves as the ranking member on the Senate Oversight Committee for the USPS.

According to the data, mail delivery in the Detroit region was about 15% slower than the national average during the first week of October, ranking the city at 67 out of 67 USPS regions. Mail delivery throughout the rest of Michigan was 0.5% slower than the national average.


The national average mail delivery time has also dropped from 91% of on-time delivery to 86%. Officials said the agency’s goal is to deliver 95% of first class mail on time.

 

[Harry Dresden]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

trump did not cripple the PO.....the PO's problems are of their own making...

Well it went from 90-95% delivery of First class mail within 5 days down to 65% delivery in 5 days in some places in Detroit and other big cities, AFTER DeJoys changes he made in early July, or June.

The PO may have had problems, but he made it worse....

what i read it went down to 85%......and all those changes have been going on for years.....especially the OT situation.....trump and the democrats have blown this up way more than what it is...

Harry...more info on it....Detroit ran 15% lower, than usps national average....

Detroit mail delivery slowest in nation, USPS data shows

The United States Postal Service (USPS) released new data that ranks Detroit’s postal delivery in last place, raising concerns about the effect that delivery delays could have on the presidential election just 10 days away.

www.clickondetroit.com

DETROIT – The United States Postal Service (USPS) released new data that ranks Detroit’s postal delivery in last place, raising concerns about the effect that delivery delays could have on the presidential election just 10 days away.

The data was released due to a federal court order and was part of a new report on USPS performance released by Sen. Gary Peters, who has been investigating USPS delivery delays since July. Peters serves as the ranking member on the Senate Oversight Committee for the USPS.

According to the data, mail delivery in the Detroit region was about 15% slower than the national average during the first week of October, ranking the city at 67 out of 67 USPS regions. Mail delivery throughout the rest of Michigan was 0.5% slower than the national average.


The national average mail delivery time has also dropped from 91% of on-time delivery to 86%. Officials said the agency’s goal is to deliver 95% of first class mail on time.

Detroit just might have some shitty management too....