The Geminga Scenario

Part 5
........
EXCERPTS:
...
lunaiapetus_133.jpg

Since “Moon with a View” was originally posted, reaction has been varied – to say the least!

Some, on reading, have become intrigued. Others are repelled. And some, typified by this truly wondrous comment on “Coast to Coast AM” a few nights ago – “This time Hoagland has really walked off the cliff!” – are simply, as the phrase goes, “out to lunch.”

Fundamental to many criticisms of this theory is the scale of the construction we’re proposing. These critics see the entire idea of an “artificial moon” – and one almost a thousand miles across -- as totally preposterous, mainly because of the size of such an undertaking. What they forget is that some of these (artificial world) ideas are actually quite old … and increasingly achievable – even (as you will see) within the constraints of current technology and physics!

Their most famous incarnation is, in major part, due to Princeton University’s Institute for Advanced Studies’ professor, Dr. Freeman Dyson. Almost half a century ago, Dyson published a remarkable idea in the prestigious mainstream journal, Science [Dyson, F. J. "Search for Artificial Sources of Infrared Radiation," Science, 131, 1667 (1959)] – which described something termed a “Dyson Sphere.” Dyson ended his Science paper with the following conclusion:

“I think I have shown that there are good scientific reasons for taking seriously the possibility that life and intelligence can succeed in molding this universe of ours to their own purposes [emphasis added] ….”
.....
In Dyson’s 1950’s calculations, he envisioned huge, artificial planets -- built from the “disassembly” of a star’s natural planetary system, and its subsequent reassembly into a vast number of smaller, precisely engineered artificial worlds. The resulting “Dyson Sphere,” in Dyson’s speculations, seemed the largest artificial structures that an advanced civilization could probably ever technologically create. And as such, he believed, they might even be observable light years away, with our “primitive” technology from Earth ….

In this classic Science paper, Dyson was suggesting that such extraordinary objects – by literally englobing an entire solar system in a swarm of artificial “worlds,” thereby trapping almost all the parent sun’s emitted light and converting it to heat -- would glow brilliantly in the infrared region of the spectrum ... thus giving themselves away even in Earth’s 20th/21st Century telescopes, as “artificially modified star systems” (below).

lunaiapetus_135.jpg

Dyson’s inspiration for this extraordinary idea (as was Arthur C. Clarke’s for many of his …) ultimately derived from famed science fiction writer, Olaf Stapledon – in particular, his 1937 classic, “Star Maker”:

… As the eons advanced, hundreds of thousands of worlds were constructed, all of this type, but gradually increasing in size and complexity. Many a star without natural planets came to be surrounded by concentric rings of artificial worlds. In some cases the inner rings contained scores, the outer rings thousands of globes adapted to life at some particular distance from the Sun ….

Since Dyson’s pioneering publication of his “outrageous” speculation some 50 years ago, other workers have followed up with a variety of additional scenarios. All agree that, given enough time and current technological advancement, even our own terrestrial civilization could construct the beginnings of a “baby” Dyson sphere (see schematic - below), perhaps in the next hundred or so years. The key is in those terms: “time” … and “technological development.”
lunaiapetus_137.jpg


lunaiapetus_138.gif


lunaiapetus_139.jpg


lunaiapetus_140.jpg


lunaiapetus_141.jpg


lunaiapetus_142.jpg


lunaiapetus_143.jpg


lunaiapetus_144.jpg


lunaiapetus_146.jpg


lunaiapetus_148.jpg


lunaiapetus_149.jpg


lunaiapetus_150.jpg

...
But, besides being uniquely supportive of the other “tetrahedral clues” embodied in Iapetus -- the entire “moon,” as a gigantic fullerene (!) – this recursive statement could also be seen as redundant communication of the unique materials making up this “moon.” In other words, a back-up message: to underscore to any materials scientist, even viewing from a distance (below) -- “This place is obviously artificial!”

lunaiapetus_151.jpg

If whoever left this increasingly remarkable object “parked” in orbit around Saturn wanted such a set of signatures to be recognizable -- even after the erosion of literally millions of years -- they would have needed precisely this degree of “redundancy and convergent clues,” potentially linked to other “messages” left in other places in the solar system … to make the “message” real.

Culminating with this astonishing result—

Take the specific geometry that now seems to shape Iapetus – a truncated icosahedron, a duplicate of the “C60 fullerene.” Multiply it by the number of radii Iapetus is orbiting away from Saturn (60 …). And discover—

360 -- the exact number of degrees in a full circle/orbit of this extraordinary “moon!”


The odds against these precise, interrelated “tetrahedral” numbers constantly recurring in one “moon” -- each neatly “encoded” in the very size, shape, distance and orbital inclination of Iapetus by “sheer coincidence” -- are literally now overwhelming!!

The clincher is the recursive relationship between Iapetus’ measurable, remarkable macro-fullerene appearance ... and the extraordinary physical properties of the microscopic carbon nanotubes that, in our model, someone had to use to build it!
...
lunaiapetus_153.jpg


lunaiapetus_156a.jpg


lunaiapetus_157.jpg


lunaiapetus_160.jpg


lunaiapetus_161.jpg


lunaiapetus_162.jpg


lunaiapetus_169.jpg


lunaiapetus_170.jpg


 
PART 6
.........
As can be seen in this 1950’s classic (below), painted by another of Arthur’s long-time friends – the “father of space art” himself, Chesley Bonestell -- because of its highly tilted orbit, Iapetus is the only “moon” with a spectacular perspective on both the Ringed Planet … and all of Saturn’s other moons …
lunaiapetus_174.jpg

Considering that Chesley painted this evocative scene decades before astronomers had anything to look at but a “winking” point of light, the resemblance to the Iapetus that Voyager and Cassini have now given us (below) is startling – right down to the leading hemisphere’s “dark russet hue” …
..........
RCH next engages some interesting speculations (which I'll provide a counter view to later).
...... EXCERPT
Which brings us back to the overarching, crucial question: just what the hell is Iapetus … if it’s not just a “natural” moon!?

In Part 5 we laid out two possible scenarios.

1) That, this extraordinary object was deliberately constructed as an “ark” – an artificial, world-sized spacecraft -- designed to rescue as many as possible from the imminent, hyperdimensional explosion of an entire world, the destruction of a former major member of the sun’s planetary system which now no longer exists: Planet V. An event which would have inevitably, disastrously, affected the very existence of even an extremely advanced, solar system wide civilization … which we (and others) -- based on a myriad of accumulating evidence -- have proposed arose long before us … literally millions of years ago.

2) That Iapetus was indeed a “Deathstar world” -- created as an instrument of war by that same civilization (which is still humans’ primary occupation, isn’t it?) – an “instrument” then used in some unimaginable conflict in this solar system a long, long time ago ….

That Iapetus may somehow have even been instrumental in creating the almost unimaginable holocaust – a literal “war in Heaven” -- which ultimately resulted in the deliberate destruction of that same doomed world … with Iapetus itself caught by the aftermath. As an eternal, silent tomb, forever trapped now in a permanent, unique orbit around Saturn ….

But, as we hinted in earlier sections of this Series, there are problems with both of these “solutions” to the current, increasingly profound mysteries presented by Iapetus … major problems.

For instance, the density of this otherwise extraordinary “moon” is awfully close to the density of several other Saturnian moons – close to frozen water … ~1 gram/cubic centimeter. How (some critics have asked) is that possible – if the intention was “to leave an unmistakable, artificial marker in the solar system …?” Wouldn’t such “designers” have wanted Iapetus’ density “to truly stand out?” -- thus deliberately creating Iapetus with a measurable density significantly less than water ice (by merely making the “moon” bigger, in the “constructed” model, but with the same mass …).

If, indeed, this was the prime intention -- to uniquely signal its artificial origin across the depths of space and time … to a distant future generation – wouldn’t designers of such an “artificial world” have made sure its density reflected that intent?

The answer, of course, depends on your definition of the term “artificial.”

The fact is, we have never insisted that Iapetus was/is totally artificial. Nor, that such an external signal to “a future generation” was its prime reason for creation!

Even if Iapetus was a completely natural moon, and was subsequently covered over with a series of deep, constructed artificial shells – made of our suggested carbon nanotubes, and created in the geometric form that we see in the Cassini imaging – the end product, in terms of strict definitions, would most certainly qualify as “artificial!” However, the impact of even such major surface modifications on the natural moon’s total average density would still be almost trivial … even for an artificial set of geometric “layers” extending into the interior for literally miles ….

So, we began looking at a third possibility to explain the bizarre existence of Iapetus, one which neatly – inherently -- resolves the apparent contradictions of these first two tentative scenarios ….

And, then it struck us.

That -- some time before the destruction of Planet V -- in the natural course of the inexorable expansion through and colonization of the ancient solar system (by our posited “ancient, advanced human civilization”) … Iapetus (as a previously natural moon, but one laden with highly desirable raw materials) was specifically transformed for another purpose altogether: from being just a completely natural satellite … into an artificially-modified, carefully crafted “designer world”… to serve as another highly specialized purpose: as a vast, orbiting “hotel.”

Which was then moved from its original location (maybe in this system, maybe farther out … Uranus … or Neptune … or even from the so-called “Kuiper Belt”) -- to finally occupy the most coveted location in the entire ancient solar system: a look-down orbit on the most visually stunning (and hyperdimensionally-significant) planet known ….
SATURN
........

lunaiapetus_180.jpg


lunaiapetus_181.jpg


lunaiapetus_183.jpg


lunaiapetus_188.jpg


lunaiapetus_189.jpg


“9) And in 1943, Hoffman at Princeton in a public lecture



... about Kron's version of the UFT … says ‘we now have experimental confirmation of Einstein's Unified Field Theory.’ He was talking about the effects in motors ... but, he means what he says. Einstein's theory of a [low energy!] relation between ‘electromagnetism and gravity’ has been proven – because of observable effects it predicts in [rotating] motors …."

-- Note: This information was provided on background by a scientist working at a small aerospace engineering and advanced technology company in Cypress, California who wishes to remain anonymous...

Rotation … rotation … rotation ….
...
Simple.

If Iapetus is a modified moon/spacecraft, developed by an advanced interplanetary/interstellar civilization … then it is foreordained to have embodied physics and engineering far beyond of any current capabilities or even theories.

Ergo: it was NOT propelled by “rockets.”

If Einstein’s UFT ideas, or any of the modern variants which have evolved -- from super strings to M-brane theory – can ultimately be engineered into workable technologies for literally bending space and time ... then, all bets are off. Anything could be waiting inside Iapetusif we return.

Only one thing now seems clear:

Whoever designed it, for whatever ultimate objective, if our “insider” physicist is correct in observing “…one way of thinking of an antigravity device is to think of it as an unusual form of electrical motor …”, then the mystery of Iapetus ~60,000-foot-high“wall” may now be close to resolution—

As the massive field coils of a world-sized, anti-gravity propulsion system ... which may have literally carried Iapetus between the stars … setting in motion a series of extraordinary events, stretching across literally billions of ensuing years … which would one day lead to us!


If that is true, then its very name – “Iapetus” … the father of Prometheus, the “maker of Mankind” --- is eerie foreshadowing of all we might one day confirm ….

Could that stark possibility – that, in Iapetus, we are confronting our very origins … if not the origins of every living thing on Earth -- explain the startling series of events … from the Vatican to Washington DC … that Cassini’s shocking close-ups set in motion at the turning of 2005?

 
Turns out there is no "PART 7".

Many of "us" were involved in the Richard C. Hoagland website "Message Board" about 20 years ago when this series came out and our commentary and such began to shape the direction of his "episodes" as this developed. Our feedback helped shape and guide what concepts and ideas were used to flesh further developments. Hence the shift from context and focus of the first parts to the later parts.

However: PART 7 never appeared and speculation is did Richard C. Hoagland (RCH) fail to extrapolate the material we sent him via the message board of his website: "The Enterprise Mission .com or did some other interest/faction intervene ??? As he presented his six parts, the feedback on his site/forum seemed to guide/steer the content and direction of the later parts. Yet is it possible something in those contributions of ideas and thoughts clashed with the ideas and agendas of others ... ???

By PART 6 it looks like we might be closing on to something of major significance, and a strong implied extrapolation, yet it all suddenly went dead ~ quiet.

Has yet to revive or go further .... after nearly 20 years ....

In the meantime, Richard has lost his wife, who passed on several years ago, and being about five years older than I am, I can understand how that could slow down the energy and enthusiasm to go on ....

Also, it appears he lost or gave up his website ID and "TheEnterpriseMission.com" no longer exists.

Hopefully others will be able to carry-on and continue the research and efforts he began decades ago.

It's been years since he and I last communicated and I'm trying to re-establish such. Hopefully we'll reconnect and I can provide some updates on these matters.
 
Another in a long chain of articles on Neanderthal and early human connections, relations, and/or coitus(?).

So far I've yet to find any of these confirm if the Neanderthal had 48 chromosomes which is common with all apes/hominoids or had 46 chromosomes which is what only human/homo sapiens have.
If humans evolved out of Neanderthal and the two species co-existed for a time, that would clear the confusion, maybe.
 
Something I just posted in another thread that could relate to here;


I'm not religious but I've always believed there is an infinite dimension we cannot see that we are all apart of. We get to walk around in meat suits for a few decades or maybe some other biological shell but we always return to the infinite dimension. My own idea, I don't know or care if anyone agrees.
I've had something similar for a few decades now.

1. It starts with the assumption, based upon the consistent order and systems of the Cosmos, that there may be a Creative Designer or Intelligent Creator involved in making all this of the Universe/Cosmos.

2. Since logic would suggest "You can't get Something form Nothing."; then this Universe/Physical Existence must be product from the Substance of the Intelligent Creator/Creative Designer.

3. It then follows that if this Creator/Designer is Eternal, has no Beginning nor any End, then all that It* has made of It's own substance would also be Eternal.
* Being a single Entity and not in need of reproduction(sex) than the Creator/Designer doesn't need to be referred to as He or She.

4. Everything in this Universe(Existence) being Eternal and 'Of the Creator', than we humans would be a part of the Creator/Designer. We are "It" and "It" is we. The foundation of the implied message of Christ and others that we should treat all as we would ourselves; because "They are We, We are They".

5. Also, everything in the Universe/Existence being Eternal, than the Big Bang will become the Big Collapse, which will again become the Big Bang, and again the Big Collapse, Etc., Etc., Etc., ...

6. The above would also suggest that our Soul (the non-physical aspect of our Spirit) is Eternal (as is the Creator, which it is a part of *) and also would have no Beginning nor an End.
* Think of "us" as individual souls being like cells in the body of the Creator.

7. Our Souls having an Eternal aspect, then it's probable we would have many "lifetimes" (occupation of bodies; "meat suits"), a process often referred to as Reincarnation(s). The most probable purpose of such process would be to have a range of physical experiences that would also effect a path of Spiritual growth/education/progression leading back to a fully spiritual and non-physical existence. Alternatively, physical existence might be a game/recreation of sorts done for amusement and overcoming challenges.

8. While many to most "religions" present some to most of these concepts, no single "Religion" to date appears to have presented the full story/concept in this manner(as above). Partly why I take "The Bible - OT & NT" with a "grain of salt"; as with all other Religions and their dogma/texts. I suspect this may be because currently this planet is property of Extra Terrestrial colonists whom accelerated hominid evolution to create we humans (homo sapiens) for their purposes, and constrained Spiritual knowledge~growth might enable them to better control humans. (Religion is a population control device). As suggested in a thread I started here a while back;
The Geminga Scenario
 
Tesla's "tech" might have been another influence of the Anunnaki.

The Intriguing Intersection of Nikola Tesla's "Death Ray," MIT's John G. Trump, and the FBI's Curiosity​

 
Relates here since the Gemingans might have had;

Star Trek's Warp Drives: A Step Closer to Reality?​


New Discoveries Indicate Warp Drive Feasibility According to Current Physics: Highlights from ScienceAlert​

 
I've come across similar accounts over the years. Seems some claims have the Anunnaki (some anyway) being taller than humans;

'10-foot-tall people' discovered by archaeologists in Nevada cave​

 
Reincarnation being part of the theme here, these may have something to consider;
I haven't had time to compare these, so this is archive for now;

17 Things People Get Totally Wrong About The Afterlife​


19 Things People Get Totally Wrong About the Afterlife​


25 Things People Often Get Wrong About the Afterlife​

 

Forum List

Back
Top