Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The gnostic gospels are not in the Bible for a reason: they don't belong there.
But it is vexing, to wonder why the Books of Enoch weren't put in it.
The gnostic gospels are not in the Bible for a reason: they don't belong there.
But it is vexing, to wonder why the Books of Enoch weren't put in it.
I believe the books of Enoch are a misquote or forgery. I believe we have the correct quote in the Bible.
perhaps the gospel of Judas wasn't included in the canonization of scripture because no one was aware of it at the time......
perhaps the gospel of Judas wasn't included in the canonization of scripture because no one was aware of it at the time......
I've always thought that if they weren't aware of it, it meant they weren't read.
perhaps the gospel of Judas wasn't included in the canonization of scripture because no one was aware of it at the time......
I've always thought that if they weren't aware of it, it meant they weren't read.
I believe when manuscripts got old, they would break parts of them off and circulate them around the churches to be read. If they weren't aware of it, does that mean they weren't in the Bible? I think they they weren't in the Bible.
I've always thought that if they weren't aware of it, it meant they weren't read.
I believe when manuscripts got old, they would break parts of them off and circulate them around the churches to be read. If they weren't aware of it, does that mean they weren't in the Bible? I think they they weren't in the Bible.
the church chose what went in the bible, they knew about most if not all the teachings.
They just took the ones that made the best story and gave them the most control over the masses.
I believe when manuscripts got old, they would break parts of them off and circulate them around the churches to be read. If they weren't aware of it, does that mean they weren't in the Bible? I think they they weren't in the Bible.
the church chose what went in the bible, they knew about most if not all the teachings.
They just took the ones that made the best story and gave them the most control over the masses.
Millions of people in the church died because of persecution so I would take the word of those who died over those who didn't die for anything.
Its kind of like this, those who didn't die didn't care for the faith and they are the ones who started heresies.
the church chose what went in the bible, they knew about most if not all the teachings.
They just took the ones that made the best story and gave them the most control over the masses.
Millions of people in the church died because of persecution so I would take the word of those who died over those who didn't die for anything.
Its kind of like this, those who didn't die didn't care for the faith and they are the ones who started heresies.
the killings (feeding christians to the lions) happened long before the church formed
I believe when manuscripts got old, they would break parts of them off and circulate them around the churches to be read. If they weren't aware of it, does that mean they weren't in the Bible? I think they they weren't in the Bible.
the church chose what went in the bible, they knew about most if not all the teachings.
They just took the ones that made the best story and gave them the most control over the masses.
Millions of people in the church died because of persecution so I would take the word of those who died over those who didn't die for anything.
Its kind of like this, those who didn't die didn't care for the faith and they are the ones who started heresies.
the church chose what went in the bible, they knew about most if not all the teachings.
They just took the ones that made the best story and gave them the most control over the masses.
Millions of people in the church died because of persecution so I would take the word of those who died over those who didn't die for anything.
Its kind of like this, those who didn't die didn't care for the faith and they are the ones who started heresies.
The fact people died doesn't ascribe ultimate truth to a given text.
People die for bad causes all the time, that doesn't suddenly glorify their sacrifice. It just means they made the ultimate mistake.
Ascribing authority to such deeds is not enlightenment, it is lazy. Truth is not found from outside forces, good or bad, but from within.
perhaps the gospel of Judas wasn't included in the canonization of scripture because no one was aware of it at the time......
In other words, if the Emperor asked, "Is Ceasar Lord?", I wouldn't trust someone with the apocrypha when they said, "Yes". It means they stayed alive supporting an alternate belief.
perhaps the gospel of Judas wasn't included in the canonization of scripture because no one was aware of it at the time......
Along with other non-canonized works.
Canonized or not doesn't matter to all denominations of faiths. My thing's always been anything about God is something I wanna read. And the more people tell me it doesn't matter, or isn't part of official Canon, the more I wanna read it.