The Hill: So Who Is Paying Avenatti?

[Weatherman2020]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

 

[JakeStarkey]

The false standard put forth by the OP is reprehensible.

All Avenatti has to do is represent his client faithfully to the canons and ethics of the bar.

He is doing that.

And Cohen has been breaking the canons and ethics regularly. He is going to get his legal nuts fried.

 

[jc456]

Trumps a F'n idiot and piss poor at risk management.

when this whole Stormy firestorm erupted ALL he had to say was " yeah, I banged a porn star ONE TIME -SO WHAT ? " and let her sell her story to the highest bidder while he went on about his business - this entire pile of crap in his pocket would be gone and done with

but

Trump would rather lie, soak up attention, and be center spotlight for as long as possible, and try and control the entire situation .....

he had an easy button - he didnt want it or was too F'n dumb to take it

SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

F HIM AND HIS HORSE.

when one like this has nothing.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The false standard put forth by the OP is reprehensible.

All Avenatti has to do is represent his client faithfully to the canons and ethics of the bar.

He is doing that.

And Cohen has been breaking the canons and ethics regularly. He is going to get his legal nuts fried.

Just like Cohen did, amiright?

 

[BlackFlag]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

Who cares? I’ll start a GoFundMe. Avenatti is putting on the greatest show on Earth

 

[Snouter]

I am gonna guess Crooked Hillary via a fake law firm, similar to how Crooked Hillary financed the fake "Russian Dossier" Hoax.

 

[debbiedowner]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

Who cares? I’ll start a GoFundMe. Avenatti is putting on the greatest show on Earth

There's already a I believe it was called justice funding with over $400,000 grand donated. No one except donations are paying her attorney despite what low life's may think.

 

[bodecea]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

How much is he being paid?

 

[Weatherman2020]

I am gonna guess Crooked Hillary via a fake law firm, similar to how Crooked Hillary financed the fake "Russian Dossier" Hoax.

I'm sure Soros has his claws in it somewhere.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I am sure that Avenatti is working on contingency.

 

[toomuchtime_]

I am sure that Avenatti is working on contingency.

lol What are they suing for? He says he is being paid by a crowd funding site he set up but who would send money to it?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

Who cares? I’ll start a GoFundMe. Avenatti is putting on the greatest show on Earth

There's already a I believe it was called justice funding with over $400,000 grand donated. No one except donations are paying her attorney despite what low life's may think.

But donations from whom?

 

[BlindBoo]

Obviously pro bono.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Obviously pro bono.

lol Because it's such a worthy cause? No, he set up a crowd funding site. It's a good way to launder donations from Obama and Clinton supporters.

 

[OKTexas]

The false standard put forth by the OP is reprehensible.

All Avenatti has to do is represent his client faithfully to the canons and ethics of the bar.

He is doing that.

And Cohen has been breaking the canons and ethics regularly. He is going to get his legal nuts fried.

Who is paying the bills is totally relevant, it's claimed to be crowd sourcing, yet he hasn't provided what crowd sourcing service he's using. My guess he's he being paid by dem donors and this is nothing but a political stunt.


.

 

[BlackFlag]

Obviously pro bono.

lol Because it's such a worthy cause? No, he set up a crowd funding site. It's a good way to launder donations from Obama and Clinton supporters.

Lol a Trump sheep probably shouldn’t bring up anything about money laundering

 

[toomuchtime_]

The false standard put forth by the OP is reprehensible.

All Avenatti has to do is represent his client faithfully to the canons and ethics of the bar.

He is doing that.

And Cohen has been breaking the canons and ethics regularly. He is going to get his legal nuts fried.

Who is paying the bills is totally relevant, it's claimed to be crowd sourcing, yet he hasn't provided what crowd sourcing service he's using. My guess he's he being paid by dem donors and this is nothing but a political stunt.


.

What??? Are you saying allowing porn actresses to extort many from men they sleep and then sell their stories is not a worthwhile cause?

 

[OKTexas]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

Who cares? I’ll start a GoFundMe. Avenatti is putting on the greatest show on Earth

There's already a I believe it was called justice funding with over $400,000 grand donated. No one except donations are paying her attorney despite what low life's may think.

.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Obviously pro bono.

lol Because it's such a worthy cause? No, he set up a crowd funding site. It's a good way to launder donations from Obama and Clinton supporters.

Lol a Trump sheep probably shouldn’t bring up anything about money laundering

You must be referring to all the leaked rumors from the Mueller-Rosenstein faux investigation that have produced nothing.