Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
State for the record and swear on the lives of your loved ones that you have never engaged in sexual intercourse for any other reason than reproduction.
ROFLMNAO! And we have ANOTHER of the "Sex is Pleasurable... therefore Sex was designed to give pleasure" idiots.
Folks, you cannot make this crap UP!
And that is how we can "KNOW" that the would-be 'People', are truly, what in greater nature is that which is known as: FOOD!
The repeated question that you refuse to answer is,
do you only engage in sexual intercourse for the purpose of reproduction?
OH! You 'feel' your little query wasn't answered... LOL! Now isn't that PRECIOUS?
Here's a clue scamp... "Why" one engages in sex, has no bearing on "WHAT NATURE DESIGNED SEX FOR".
But it DOES, however, demonstrate the efficacy of nature's design.
Pubes, hon....nature is remarkably creative. Sex may have at one time been designed soley for procreation way back when we were primative amphibious slimewads - but it is not just procreative anymore. Ever read about Bonobos?
Wrong. The sex drive is deeply ingrained in us, even today. It is so powerful that we do it a lot. The way nature intended to propagate the species. You have fun doing it because nature requires you to do it.
Why do you think young girls get knocked up by young boys? Because the "fun" of having sex does what it was intended to do.
Mark
So the sex drive in humans is there to "have fun", and not for procreation?
Again. Wow.
Mark
why would the two be mutually exclusive?
Like "keys" stated, pleasure was built into sex to "force" humans to engage in it for procreation. In evolutionary terms, there is no other reason.
Whether you can have sex for fun is not he question,. The question was whether fun was the driver. Fun is not the driver. Procreation is the driver. Fun is the impetus.
Mark
Well said.
One needs to understand that the Ideological Left lacks the objectivity which is essential to sound reason.
In effect what you see in the Left is roughly what would be expected from animals who were gifted with some potential for higher reasoning.
Nature, for instance, regulates sex drive in animals as a means to regulate procreation, IF nature provided the same sense and memory of pleasure in animals, they would procreate themselves into catastrophe.
We see this in humanity... where ever the Left is found in bulging, uncontrolled populations. Such is their limited cognition that they lack any sense of responsibility, or the need to discipline their base appetites.
It is not an overstatement that these people are sub-standard human beings, or 'sub-human'.
Sadly, our culture will not survive as a result of our failure to recognize that such people should never be allowed to speak publicly... . In the post apocalypse, people will laugh at the idea that we allowed such people to influence others, and ROLL ON THE FLOOR LAUGHING that we allowed them to vote.
The unanswered question remains, coward. Do you only ever engage in sex when you are trying to reproduce?
So the sex drive in humans is there to "have fun", and not for procreation?
Again. Wow.
Mark
why would the two be mutually exclusive?
Like "keys" stated, pleasure was built into sex to "force" humans to engage in it for procreation. In evolutionary terms, there is no other reason.
Whether you can have sex for fun is not he question. The question was whether fun was the driver. Fun is not the driver. Procreation is the driver. Fun is the impetus.
Mark
Well said.
One needs to understand that the Ideological Left lacks the objectivity which is essential to sound reason.
In effect what you see in the Left is roughly what would be expected from animals who were gifted with some potential for higher reasoning.
Nature, for instance, regulates sex drive in animals as a means to regulate procreation, IF nature provided the same sense and memory of pleasure in animals, they would procreate themselves into catastrophe.
We see this in humanity... where ever the Left is found in bulging, uncontrolled populations. Such is their limited cognition that they lack any sense of responsibility, or the need to discipline their base appetites.
It is not an overstatement that these people are sub-standard human beings, or 'sub-human'.
Sadly, our culture will not survive as a result of our failure to recognize that such people should never be allowed to speak publicly... . In the post apocalypse, people will laugh at the idea that we allowed such people to influence others, and ROLL ON THE FLOOR LAUGHING that we allowed them to vote.
The unanswered question remains, coward. Do you only ever engage in sex when you are trying to reproduce?
There is no question which has gone unanswered. That you lack the minimal intellectual means to recognize that, doesn't change reality.
That is incorrect. Sex is for pleasure, and bonding, and reproduction hitches a ride now and then. It's why you can jerk off, and why nearly all sex that is had wasn't meant to produce children. My favorite sex could never produce a child but the wife does usually brush her teeth afterwards while I pour her a drink as a reward.Children as the natural consequence of coitus.... it's what such was designed for.
So the sex drive in humans is there to "have fun", and not for procreation?
Again. Wow.
Mark
why would the two be mutually exclusive?
Like "keys" stated, pleasure was built into sex to "force" humans to engage in it for procreation. In evolutionary terms, there is no other reason.
Whether you can have sex for fun is not he question. The question was whether fun was the driver. Fun is not the driver. Procreation is the driver. Fun is the impetus.
Mark
Well said.
One needs to understand that the Ideological Left lacks the objectivity which is essential to sound reason.
In effect what you see in the Left is roughly what would be expected from animals who were gifted with some potential for higher reasoning.
Nature, for instance, regulates sex drive in animals as a means to regulate procreation, IF nature provided the same sense and memory of pleasure in animals, they would procreate themselves into catastrophe.
We see this in humanity... where ever the Left is found in bulging, uncontrolled populations. Such is their limited cognition that they lack any sense of responsibility, or the need to discipline their base appetites.
It is not an overstatement that these people are sub-standard human beings, or 'sub-human'.
Sadly, our culture will not survive as a result of our failure to recognize that such people should never be allowed to speak publicly... . In the post apocalypse, people will laugh at the idea that we allowed such people to influence others, and ROLL ON THE FLOOR LAUGHING that we allowed them to vote.
Procreation may be the main component of the drive but that does not mean it is SOLEY procreative anymore.
1. The homos are damn sure demanding the rest of us not just acknowledge their choice but that we agree with it and don't say anything other than you agree with it.
Really now? No one is saying you have to agree with it or even acknowledge it.
So... which is it? Are you lying outright? Or are ya an imbecile?
I ask because what you've advanced as truth, is demonstrably false. SO FALSE IS IT, that in truth, you must either be attempting to deceive the readers of this board or you lack the cognitive means common to a popsicle.
First, I didn't say that...
But since ya brought it up:
Children are the natural consequence of coitus.... it's what such was designed for.
Did you want to contest that?
LOL! No WAIT!
ROFL!
You're one of those who 'feel' that because coitus is pleasurable, that such was designed to provide pleasure?
LMAO!
Before ya answer... you should know, that sexual intercourse is purposed for conception... part and parcel of promoting the likelihood of such, the human body is designed to trigger specific hormonal responses when the brain recognizes the potential for such, the genitals are designed around a phalanx of sensors which induce a sense of pleasure, which ... AGAIN ... sets a pattern of pleasure, so as to promote the likelihood of recurrence, thus increasing the potential for procreation, toward the biological imperative OKA: The Propagation of the Species.
A process which rests deep within the base instincts of the mammal... thus is animalistic... and which, provides very real 'danger' to the individual human female, as it sharply reduces her means to sustain herself thus REDUCING the likelihood of procreation, which is balanced through MARRIAGE, wherein the male provides for the safety and sustenance of the female and subsequent progeny... which requires nearly two decades of constant nurturing and training before it is a viable individual.
Now... having been educated on the issue.
Go ahead and tell the board what you feel 'sex' is for... .
Don't be shy now... go ahead.
State for the record and swear on the lives of your loved ones that you have never engaged in sexual intercourse for any other reason than reproduction.
ROFLMNAO! And we have ANOTHER of the "Sex is Pleasurable... therefore Sex was designed to give pleasure" idiots.
Folks, you cannot make this crap UP!
And that is how we can "KNOW" that the would-be 'People', are truly, what in greater nature is that which is known as: FOOD!
The repeated question that you refuse to answer is,
do you only engage in sexual intercourse for the purpose of reproduction?
OH! You 'feel' your little query wasn't answered... LOL! Now isn't that PRECIOUS?
Here's a clue scamp... "Why" one engages in sex, has no bearing on "WHAT NATURE DESIGNED SEX FOR".
But it DOES, however, demonstrate the efficacy of nature's design.
Nature made human females receptive to sex at any time, in stark contrast to almost every other species.
Why was that?
Procreation may be the main component of the drive but that does not mean it is SOLEY procreative anymore.
ROFLMNAO!
Oh... So natural principle is subject to antiquation?
LOL!
You cannot make this crap up folks. AGAIN!: In greater nature, these idiots are what is OKA: FOOD!
1. The homos are damn sure demanding the rest of us not just acknowledge their choice but that we agree with it and don't say anything other than you agree with it.
Really now? No one is saying you have to agree with it or even acknowledge it.
So... which is it? Are you lying outright? Or are ya an imbecile?
I ask because what you've advanced as truth, is demonstrably false. SO FALSE IS IT, that in truth, you must either be attempting to deceive the readers of this board or you lack the cognitive means common to a popsicle.
Hon, calm down a second and take a deep breath. Now. Is someone holding a gun to your head and demanding you agree with their choice?
Take your time
I think he has the option to disagree with something. He has that choice. He's doing a decent job in giving his reasons why he does.1. The homos are damn sure demanding the rest of us not just acknowledge their choice but that we agree with it and don't say anything other than you agree with it.
Really now? No one is saying you have to agree with it or even acknowledge it.
So... which is it? Are you lying outright? Or are ya an imbecile?
I ask because what you've advanced as truth, is demonstrably false. SO FALSE IS IT, that in truth, you must either be attempting to deceive the readers of this board or you lack the cognitive means common to a popsicle.
Hon, calm down a second and take a deep breath. Now. Is someone holding a gun to your head and demanding you agree with their choice?
Take your time
Well in fairness... you are also the ones that 'believe' that things which are ABNORMAL are normal... that paying people to NOT WORK will encourage them to seek employment and that there is a RIGHT to MURDER THE MOST INNOCENT of human beings, EVEN WHILE THEY'RE STILL IN THEIR MOTHER'S WOMB!
So... LOL! That means that you're crazy; which is to say that you suffer a perverse form of human reasoning; meaning that you're insane... and healthy people, like healthy cultures... disregard the 'feelings' of the insane.
First, I didn't say that...
But since ya brought it up:
Children are the natural consequence of coitus.... it's what such was designed for.
Did you want to contest that?
LOL! No WAIT!
ROFL!
You're one of those who 'feel' that because coitus is pleasurable, that such was designed to provide pleasure?
LMAO!
Before ya answer... you should know, that sexual intercourse is purposed for conception... part and parcel of promoting the likelihood of such, the human body is designed to trigger specific hormonal responses when the brain recognizes the potential for such, the genitals are designed around a phalanx of sensors which induce a sense of pleasure, which ... AGAIN ... sets a pattern of pleasure, so as to promote the likelihood of recurrence, thus increasing the potential for procreation, toward the biological imperative OKA: The Propagation of the Species.
A process which rests deep within the base instincts of the mammal... thus is animalistic... and which, provides very real 'danger' to the individual human female, as it sharply reduces her means to sustain herself thus REDUCING the likelihood of procreation, which is balanced through MARRIAGE, wherein the male provides for the safety and sustenance of the female and subsequent progeny... which requires nearly two decades of constant nurturing and training before it is a viable individual.
Now... having been educated on the issue.
Go ahead and tell the board what you feel 'sex' is for... .
Don't be shy now... go ahead.
Then the natural age for females to begin to have intercourse is when they've become sexually mature? Capable of reproducing?
In a "natural" world, absolutely. Why do you think they were designed that way?
Mark
Tell that to the idiot who's trying to song and dance the facts.
What facts did he deny? Like me, he acknowledges "natural" law, but also stated that because of the humans ability to reason, things change.
Mark
He denies that humans might reason that gay sexual relations are natural.
Procreation may be the main component of the drive but that does not mean it is SOLEY procreative anymore.
ROFLMNAO!
Oh... So natural principle is subject to antiquation?
LOL!
You cannot make this crap up folks. AGAIN!: In greater nature, these idiots are what is OKA: FOOD!
Sex is used for a variety of purposes pubes. Surely you are aware of this? Most of us grasp this fundemental principle in our teens.
I think he has the option to disagree with something. He has that choice. He's doing a decent job in giving his reasons why he does.1. The homos are damn sure demanding the rest of us not just acknowledge their choice but that we agree with it and don't say anything other than you agree with it.
Really now? No one is saying you have to agree with it or even acknowledge it.
So... which is it? Are you lying outright? Or are ya an imbecile?
I ask because what you've advanced as truth, is demonstrably false. SO FALSE IS IT, that in truth, you must either be attempting to deceive the readers of this board or you lack the cognitive means common to a popsicle.
Hon, calm down a second and take a deep breath. Now. Is someone holding a gun to your head and demanding you agree with their choice?
Take your time
Gays NEVER have sex for reproduction. Unless they name their turds.
Says the guy who wants to marry his TV.I think he has the option to disagree with something. He has that choice. He's doing a decent job in giving his reasons why he does.1. The homos are damn sure demanding the rest of us not just acknowledge their choice but that we agree with it and don't say anything other than you agree with it.
Really now? No one is saying you have to agree with it or even acknowledge it.
So... which is it? Are you lying outright? Or are ya an imbecile?
I ask because what you've advanced as truth, is demonstrably false. SO FALSE IS IT, that in truth, you must either be attempting to deceive the readers of this board or you lack the cognitive means common to a popsicle.
Hon, calm down a second and take a deep breath. Now. Is someone holding a gun to your head and demanding you agree with their choice?
Take your time
No, he's making a fool of himself, but it's hardly surprising you can't tell the difference.
1. The homos are damn sure demanding the rest of us not just acknowledge their choice but that we agree with it and don't say anything other than you agree with it.
Really now? No one is saying you have to agree with it or even acknowledge it. Hyperbole much?
2. You have to watch every word in order that those freaks don't get their panties in a wad.
No. You can say what you want. However there is such a thing as manners. You may lack them.
3. It would be for the freak of nature that thought HE was a girl and approached my daughter.
Seriously dude - if a transgender person felt he was a female he's hardly likely to approach your daughter.
4. Teebowing happens when someone actually accomplishes something.
Like what?
5. You think being a freak is normal. When daily new stories put those abnormal freaks on the screen, you don't have to look.
I don't care about what's normal or abnormal - a lot of that is cultural. Inside it are real people with feelings. And they aren't hurting you any. So if you can't stomach it - change the channel. I get nauseous at the overflow of hate from fundamentalists. So I change the channel. UInless you're a quadroplegic..I suggest you do the same.
Then the natural age for females to begin to have intercourse is when they've become sexually mature? Capable of reproducing?
In a "natural" world, absolutely. Why do you think they were designed that way?
Mark
Tell that to the idiot who's trying to song and dance the facts.
What facts did he deny? Like me, he acknowledges "natural" law, but also stated that because of the humans ability to reason, things change.
Mark
He denies that humans might reason that gay sexual relations are natural.
Licking your own ass is natural as well. It does not mean it should be acceptable.
Mark
