Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a bunch of crap. It really is. They haven't been "liberal" in some time.
Says who?It's a bunch of crap. It really is. They haven't been "liberal" in some time.
LMAO. They're as liberal as the day is long.
Typical crap from USMB libs. Make the argument about something else....How about you regard that the NYT salivates over stories of men being paid more and then does the same....mmmkay.
It's a bunch of crap. It really is. They haven't been "liberal" in some time.
It's a bunch of crap. It really is. They haven't been "liberal" in some time.
LMAO. They're as liberal as the day is long.
When Jill Abramson found out she was being paid less than her predecessor, Bill Keller...she complained and then was subsequently fired.
NYT Publisher Sulzberger Says Abramson Firing Driven by Conduct - Bloomberg
Typical crap from USMB libs. Make the argument about something else....How about you regard that the NYT salivates over stories of men being paid more and then does the same....mmmkay.
actually, it appears she was fired for making decisions in contradiction to what the Owner and CEO wanted, and even misled them on certain issues.
That said, what was she being paid compared to what Bill Keller was being paid. I've yet to see anyone on either side of this lay the numbers out on the table.
It's a bunch of crap. It really is. They haven't been "liberal" in some time.
LMAO. They're as liberal as the day is long.
It's usually prudent to use 'in my opinion' when painting with such a broad political brush. For example, 'in my opinion' you don't know what you're talking about. However, I hear crap like this come out of the mouths of industry outsiders on a daily basis from both ends of the political spectrum. News flash: both 'this paper is ________- biased' arguments are equally obtuse.
EVERY single newspaper in the country is either a corporation and/or relies on corporate sponsorship. That's just the way it is. Having a distinct political agenda is usually bad for business, thus being as objective as possible is the only economically viable decision. If you ain't figured this out yet, you probably never will.
But, please, feel free to jabber on about things you know nothing about. It's entertaining to see.
When Jill Abramson found out she was being paid less than her predecessor, Bill Keller...she complained and then was subsequently fired.
NYT Publisher Sulzberger Says Abramson Firing Driven by Conduct - Bloomberg
When Jill Abramson found out she was being paid less than her predecessor, Bill Keller...she complained and then was subsequently fired.
NYT Publisher Sulzberger Says Abramson Firing Driven by Conduct - Bloomberg
So?
You negotiate your own salary, she settled for less.
Says who?It's a bunch of crap. It really is. They haven't been "liberal" in some time.
LMAO. They're as liberal as the day is long.
It's a bunch of crap. It really is. They haven't been "liberal" in some time.
LMAO. They're as liberal as the day is long.
It's usually prudent to use 'in my opinion' when painting with such a broad political brush. For example, 'in my opinion' you don't know what you're talking about. However, I hear crap like this come out of the mouths of industry outsiders on a daily basis from both ends of the political spectrum. News flash: both 'this paper is ________- biased' arguments are equally obtuse.
EVERY single newspaper in the country is either a corporation and/or relies on corporate sponsorship. That's just the way it is. Having a distinct political agenda is usually bad for business, thus being as objective as possible is the only economically viable decision. If you ain't figured this out yet, you probably never will.
But, please, feel free to jabber on about things you know nothing about. It's entertaining to see.
LMAO. They're as liberal as the day is long.
It's usually prudent to use 'in my opinion' when painting with such a broad political brush. For example, 'in my opinion' you don't know what you're talking about. However, I hear crap like this come out of the mouths of industry outsiders on a daily basis from both ends of the political spectrum. News flash: both 'this paper is ________- biased' arguments are equally obtuse.
EVERY single newspaper in the country is either a corporation and/or relies on corporate sponsorship. That's just the way it is. Having a distinct political agenda is usually bad for business, thus being as objective as possible is the only economically viable decision. If you ain't figured this out yet, you probably never will.
But, please, feel free to jabber on about things you know nothing about. It's entertaining to see.
Yea__ no. Everyone and their dog knows the political leanings of NYT. There's no need to accord such trivialities. Next time you blatantly condescend, try at least being right, dude.
