dilloduck
Diamond Member
By being wrong.How is it possible to NOT demonstrate the Truth ?
How will I know when you're wrong ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By being wrong.How is it possible to NOT demonstrate the Truth ?
I am not going to grace this with an answer since it is NOTHING MORE THAN AN AD HOMINEM ATTACK!!! This is why I left Facebook. I had hoped to find gracious, intelligent, reasonable conversation here. I suppose I was wrong. For your information, I have read Kant from cover to cover. I have written NUMEROUS papers on Kant. I have a degree in Philosophy, have helped several academics with two master theses and a PhD dissertation. So please do yourself a favor and treat me with respect and address ONLY my points and not perceptions about my background, intelligence, knowledge, etc...You need to read more than the back cover of the book. Do yourself a favor and actually study Kant seriously. You'll find it very interesting.
I am not going to grace this with an answer since it is NOTHING MORE THAN AN AD HOMINEM ATTACK!!! ...You need to read more than the back cover of the book. Do yourself a favor and actually study Kant seriously. You'll find it very interesting.
For your information, I have read Kant from cover to cover. ...
It is funny how you can assess my background based on a post on a forum. ...
How will I know when you're wrong ?
I am not going to comment anymore. It is clear you are not a serious intellectual. You are just spewing out ad hominems and criticizing my background without an interest in a discussion on Epistemology. This post was not a discussion of Kant.Not so funny. You make it pretty easy.
The Prolegomena to a Future Metaphysic and Critique of Pure Reason. ...
This post was not a discussion of Kant.
The moron you found yourself engaged with never adds anything of worth to discussions here. The very idea that he would claim some expertise on philosophy is laughable considering he spends all his time here claiming to know more than everyone else. He will not even be able to decipher the irony of that.Your responses mirror that of 4chan, not of any serious discussion on anything.
Well perhaps he should go to 4chan if he wants laughs and seeks to belittle and bash people. I am not claiming to be a scholar on Kant, but I do have some background and to be disrespected like this is not what I was looking for. If I wanted that I would go back to Facebook.
Is the content of the mind perceptions of reality or reflections of empirical reality?
An ages old question:
"The terms “a priori” and “a posteriori” are used primarily to denote the foundations upon which a proposition is known. A given proposition is knowable a priori if it can be known independent of any experience other than the experience of learning the language in which the proposition is expressed, whereas a proposition that is knowable a posteriori is known on the basis of experience. For example, the proposition that all bachelors are unmarried is a priori, and the proposition that it is raining outside now is a posteriori."
See: A Priori and A Posteriori Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Well perhaps he should go to 4chan if he wants laughs and seeks to belittle and bash people. I am not claiming to be a scholar on Kant, but I do have some background and to be disrespected like this is not what I was looking for. If I wanted that I would go back to Facebook.
An ages old question:
"The terms “a priori” and “a posteriori” are used primarily to denote the foundations upon which a proposition is known. A given proposition is knowable a priori if it can be known independent of any experience other than the experience of learning the language in which the proposition is expressed, whereas a proposition that is knowable a posteriori is known on the basis of experience. For example, the proposition that all bachelors are unmarried is a priori, and the proposition that it is raining outside now is a posteriori."
See: A Priori and A Posteriori Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Ah yes, Kantian distinctions. I am aware of them. I was referring however to the basis of knowledge, more of a metaepistemic question. Not so much what we know, but how we know. And not just how we know, but the ontological question of the mind and whether there is an external world at all or whether all things come from Mind.