Mr. Jones
Senior Member
- Jan 21, 2009
- 2,501
- 163
- Thread starter
- #381
It's even worse than first thought. Today (ID)eots reached a new low when he changed the wording of an NIST answer from a Q&A session claiming the blast necessary to destroy the critical bldg 7 column and cause its failure would be only "as loud as a shot-gun blast or speakers at a rock concert..."
The actual answer was "This sound level is consistent with a gunshot blast, standing next to a jet plane engine, and more than 10 times louder than being in front of the speakers at a rock concert." The boy is clearly ready, willing and eager to lie for his "cause" and while I'm not one to block posters but I don't blame you for blocking that asshole.
Link?
Interesting. I notice you required none of (ID)eots who posted the NIST response in an altered state (and without a link) but do of me who not only busted the lying slug but included this link with that post:
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » Blog Archive » Explosion Witnesses
In response to having his lying ass exposed for all to see he then posted the unaltered version (which matched the version I posted) and included another link:
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Care to comment on (ID)eots' lying?![]()
Eots didn't lie. You were caught in lies, and you once again are using BS excuses when you can't debate the issues honestly. You have been given every chance to argue for the probability of the molten steel being aluminum and failed.
Now we are talking about other aspects of the NIST that also ignored, or failed to adequately investigate reports of explosions, symmetrical 'squibs" running down the towers tens of stories below the collapse fronts etc...
Hysterical you calling someone else a liar who knows more about the topic then you do blindfolded. It's clear you can't present any points that substantiate your OCT, and you have to resort to calling others liars, when you are one, and when you yourself believe in things that are lies.