bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,169
- 47,316
- 2,180
The judge lied.
Maybe the Liar in Chief needs better legal advice. No, they were not all thrown out due to procedural grounds. None of the cases were able to show any examples of massive voter fraud. You are a sheep that believes every lie that trump speaks. You and Hitler would have been great friends!
Judge rejects Trump campaign lawsuit seeking to block state’s presidential election results, says no evidence election was affected by fraud - The Nevada Independent
El juez James Russell emitió un fallo en contra de la solicitud sin precedentes de la campaña de Trump para bloquear la certificación de los resultados.thenevadaindependent.com
That's dead wrong, dumbass.
In his 35-page order, Russell wrote that he found the evidence offered by the Trump campaign to have “little to no value,” and failed to provide under any standard of proof that the campaign’s long list of alleged fraud and vote irregularities could be backed up under any evidentiary standard.
“Contestants did not prove under any standard of proof that any illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, for any other improper or illegal reason, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell wrote in the order. “Reasonable doubt is one based on reason, not mere possibility.”
The judge also wrote that he found many of the depositions and expert witnesses provided by the Trump campaign questionable, referring to several of the exhibits presented to the court as “unsound” or based on questionable methodology. He wrote that there was “no evidence that voter fraud rates associated with mail voting are systematically higher than voter fraud rates associated with other forms of voting,” and that there was no evidence that fraudulent election activities had affected the outcome of the presidential race in the state.
“Based on this testimony, the Court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud,” he wrote.
Trump-Appointed Judge Dismisses Pennsylvania Election Case
Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas noted that the president's "claims have no merit."www.newsweek.com
Donald Trump's latest case regarding the 2020 election results has been dismissed. On Friday, a judge (who was appointed by Trump) dismissed the case against Pennsylvania, where Trump attempted to undo Joe Biden's victory.
Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, who oversaw the case, began the scathing ruling stating: "Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
