The President is proposing to pay women to have children

[Mr Natural]

Sort of like The Handmaids Tale.

 

[mudwhistle]

Not a fan of more teen mothers and more welfare moms having kids for a "signing" bonus. This is idea needs a lot of work imo.

 

[OKTexas]

Social engineering is not your narrow definition. This society was structured in a certain way, denying certain groups rights while ensuring one group had rights. The country was engineered to provide the best outcomes for that one group. That's social engineering defined.

My narrow definition is on topic, you living in the past, not so much.

.

 

[Clipper]

Fertility rate: 'Jaw-dropping' global crash in children …​

Jul 14, 2020 · Italy is expected to see an equally dramatic population crash from 61 million to 28 million over the same timeframe. They are two of 23 countries …

World's population could plummet to 6 billion by the …​

Mar 30, 2023 · Population growth could grind to a halt by 2050, before decreasing to as little as 6 billion humans on Earth in 2100, a new analysis of birth trends has revealed.

Earth's Population Could Soon Start Falling. Here's Why​

Now a new report suggests that the world's population may peak at just 9 billion by 2050, a number far lower than previously thought. Compared to other more well-known estimates, such as those from the United Nations, the latest …

Felon47 wiped out a few hundred thousand thanks to his lies & stupidity during Covid.

 

[IM2]

My narrow definition is on topic, you living in the past, not so much.

.

“The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”
-William Faulkner

I don't live in the past, and it's time you racists put that line away. MAGA is about the past. Past social engineering is why whites have the most wealth and control today. The past creates the present, but the racist tries gaslighting by telling everybody how they live in the past because they can't face the truth. That's called fact, not fax.

 

[OKTexas]

“The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”
-William Faulkner

I don't live in the past, and it's time you racists put that line away. MAGA is about the past. Past social engineering is why whites have the most wealth and control today. The past creates the present, but the racist tries gaslighting by telling everybody how they live in the past because they can't face the truth. That's called fact, not fax.

Note to the clueless race baiter, ever thought that whites settled and developed this country in far greater numbers than any other race. But I saw nothing in your link that said these bribes would be race specific.

.

 

[IM2]

Note to the clueless race baiter, ever thought that whites settled and developed this country in far greater numbers than any other race. But I saw nothing in your link that said these bribes would be race specific.

.

I find it funny how the real race baiters try talking. Whites were the only ones allowed to come here by law, and on top of that, the government killed millions of the indigenous people who were here before them. The link from Axios does state that:

• Some of its most controversial adherents hold racist views that encouraging white people to have more babies could help maintain the race's stability.

https://www.axios.com/2025/04/22/trump-women-children-natalist-movement

You can just quit trying to deny how white supremacists have been pushing fake white genocide, fake white replacement, and increased white births. And go take a history class. Not one of these whitewashed history classes either.

 

[odanny]

This is considered a "gift" and subject to something near 50% tax, so have a baby for $2500.00.

How monumentally stupid a proposal is this? If it were someone in your city government proposing this idea you would consider him/her unfit and ask for a recall election. The thing is, if you did some digging you would have found this hypothetical person unfit and possibly never elected them.

But not for Trump. He got re-elected.

Do you know the SS had a breeding center for women to have children to advance the race? Don't tell me that Trump wants blacks and Hispanics to have more children.

 

[OKTexas]

I find it funny how the real race baiters try talking. Whites were the only ones allowed to come here by law, and on top of that, the government killed millions of the indigenous people who were here before them. The link from Axios does state that:

• Some of its most controversial adherents hold racist views that encouraging white people to have more babies could help maintain the race's stability.

https://www.axios.com/2025/04/22/trump-women-children-natalist-movement

You can just quit trying to deny how white supremacists have been pushing fake white genocide, fake white replacement, and increased white births. And go take a history class. Not one of these whitewashed history classes either.

It appears that's the only point you seem to have taken away from your link, I sincerely pity anyone who has that much hate bottled up.

.

 

[IM2]

It appears that's the only point you seem to have taken away from your link, I sincerely pity anyone who has that much hate bottled up.

.

The problem you white racists have is that you think this is hate when it's opposition to the hate YOU have. The gaslighting you guys continue trying to do is really disgusting. This is a blatantly racist administration and it is definitely pushing white supremacy, so then there is nothing else to get from this policy but that it is a blatant attempt to increase the white population.

 

[OKTexas]

The problem you white racists have is that you think this is hate when it's opposition to the hate YOU have. The gaslighting you guys continue trying to do is really disgusting. This is a blatantly racist administration and it is definitely pushing white supremacy, so then there is nothing else to get from this policy but that it is a blatant attempt to increase the white population.

Yep, for a racist with tunnel vision. BTW, I don't waste my limited energy on hate, it's too exhausting. But that's what you accuse anyone who isn't looking down your little tunnel of.

.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Really? Do tell. They could have offered me 250K in my younger days to have kids and I would have told them to pound sand.

.

We wish your parents felt the same.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Big whoop. A minor thing.

What are you worried about? You'll likely be gone in a short time.

 

[BrokeLoser]

There’s a long history of some political voices accusing Black women of having children primarily for welfare benefits, often using this stereotype to justify restricting assistance. Now, with the proposed “baby bonus” policy from the Trump administration to encourage higher birth rates, the government is being asked to incentivize childbirth for the broader population.

It’s interesting to see how public attitudes toward government support for families can shift depending on which groups are perceived to benefit. Policies that were once stigmatized as “handouts” are now reframed as necessary incentives, reflecting deeper anxieties about changing demographics in America.

The push for women to have more children has a powerful ally: Trump​

The White House is emerging as a powerful ally of the burgeoning movement of people who want women to have more children, but there's little emphasis on the unique level of danger that birth poses in the U.S.

Why it matters: The U.S. population is aging, presenting complex economic and health care challenges that "pro-natalists" argue should be addressed through raising fertility rates. At the same time, the country is facing an ongoing maternal mortality crisis and a politically fraught debate over women's reproductive health that's had widespread ripple effects.

• The pro-natalist movement is splintered into factions with different views, including some with restrictive definitions of what constitutes a family. There's also infighting over exactly how women should be reproducing — with debate around IVF and genetic screening.
• Some of its most controversial adherents hold racist views that encouraging white people to have more babies could help maintain the race's stability.

https://www.axios.com/2025/04/22/trump-women-children-natalist-movement

Based on that pesky truth/data we could improve and enhance America pretty quickly if we can just get Caucasians and Asians to fuck like rabbits and prevent dark people from running their baby factories.

 

[Independent thinker]

There’s a long history of some political voices accusing Black women of having children primarily for welfare benefits, often using this stereotype to justify restricting assistance. Now, with the proposed “baby bonus” policy from the Trump administration to encourage higher birth rates, the government is being asked to incentivize childbirth for the broader population.

It’s interesting to see how public attitudes toward government support for families can shift depending on which groups are perceived to benefit. Policies that were once stigmatized as “handouts” are now reframed as necessary incentives, reflecting deeper anxieties about changing demographics in America.

The push for women to have more children has a powerful ally: Trump​

The White House is emerging as a powerful ally of the burgeoning movement of people who want women to have more children, but there's little emphasis on the unique level of danger that birth poses in the U.S.

Why it matters: The U.S. population is aging, presenting complex economic and health care challenges that "pro-natalists" argue should be addressed through raising fertility rates. At the same time, the country is facing an ongoing maternal mortality crisis and a politically fraught debate over women's reproductive health that's had widespread ripple effects.

• The pro-natalist movement is splintered into factions with different views, including some with restrictive definitions of what constitutes a family. There's also infighting over exactly how women should be reproducing — with debate around IVF and genetic screening.
• Some of its most controversial adherents hold racist views that encouraging white people to have more babies could help maintain the race's stability.

https://www.axios.com/2025/04/22/trump-women-children-natalist-movement

Maybe Trump should reconsider that as I don't want any more children from your side, which your side seems perfectly happy to comply with. We don't need the left's gene mutations being passed on.

 

[Mac-7]

I don't believe the govt should be spending taxpayer money on any type of social engineering, including this.

.

In that case check out the Earned Income Tax Credit where low income women are being rewarded with almost $6,000 cash if they have children

 

[Mac-7]

Btw: bring in America illegally and being pregnant should move those women to the top of the deportation list

 

[Mac1958]

This smack of the Nazis paying women to have children in exchange for discharging debts.

Maybe these people will come up with a way to pay certain, uh, "kinds" of women.

Put Stephen Miller on that.

 

[luiza]

proposing to pay women to have children​

It is assumed that people like the OP would not be allowed to be involved in this scheme under any circumstances .
In fact, let's hope Trumpfy later rules out Racists like IQ-2.0 and they are debarred by law from participating.

Let bad genes go bad .
Perhaps even neutering the Undesirables

.

 

[OKTexas]

In that case check out the Earned Income Tax Credit where low income women are being rewarded with almost $6,000 cash if they have children

I'm fully aware, and don't agree with that either.

.