The religion of atheists is socialism

[ding]

Everyone is going to die. No one gets out of this world alive.

why invest in healthcare options?

capitalists are inherently liars and thieves masquerading as moralists. capitalism is inherently evil.

No, that's the gradualist capitalist response; evade, escape, deny.

Capitalism is not based on morals. Capitalism is based on the efficient use of capital to provide a product or a service at competitive pricing. Capitalism is Darwinian. God loves capitalism. He created it.

No social morals for free; i got it.

I wish you did get it.

i do; it is why You have Only yourself to be accountable to, for Your fallacies.

No. It is not just me. It is everyone and it is not just fallacies it is everything.

 

[ding]

Not possible their whole strategy of gradualism is based upon deceit and deception. Everything those inherently evil socialists believe and do is based on a fallacy.

nope; i am advocating for equal protection of the law, as that form of capital gain.

You already have that. No one is discriminating against filthy socialists just yet.

it is about the Socialism of equality regarding application of the law.

Which according to the socialism of socialism is equality via uniformity.

Standards, in other words. Our federal Congress is delegated that social Power, as well.

No. Not standards. Normalization of deviance. We have individual rights here. Not group rights.

 

[danielpalos]

why invest in healthcare options?

capitalists are inherently liars and thieves masquerading as moralists. capitalism is inherently evil.

No, that's the gradualist capitalist response; evade, escape, deny.

Capitalism is not based on morals. Capitalism is based on the efficient use of capital to provide a product or a service at competitive pricing. Capitalism is Darwinian. God loves capitalism. He created it.

No social morals for free; i got it.

I wish you did get it.

i do; it is why You have Only yourself to be accountable to, for Your fallacies.

No. It is not just me. It is everyone and it is not just fallacies it is everything.

in other words, you want a social bailout but don't want me to get one.

 

[danielpalos]

nope; i am advocating for equal protection of the law, as that form of capital gain.

You already have that. No one is discriminating against filthy socialists just yet.

it is about the Socialism of equality regarding application of the law.

Which according to the socialism of socialism is equality via uniformity.

Standards, in other words. Our federal Congress is delegated that social Power, as well.

No. Not standards. Normalization of deviance. We have individual rights here. Not group rights.

Normalization of deviance for the public Good, is lawful. That requires group rights, not just selfish, individual rights.

 

[ding]

You already have that. No one is discriminating against filthy socialists just yet.

it is about the Socialism of equality regarding application of the law.

Which according to the socialism of socialism is equality via uniformity.

Standards, in other words. Our federal Congress is delegated that social Power, as well.

No. Not standards. Normalization of deviance. We have individual rights here. Not group rights.

Normalization of deviance for the public Good, is lawful. That requires group rights, not just selfish, individual rights.

No. Normalization of deviance is stupid and requires stupid people to believe it is for the public good. There is no such thing as group rights here, comrade.

 

[ding]

Capitalism is not based on morals. Capitalism is based on the efficient use of capital to provide a product or a service at competitive pricing. Capitalism is Darwinian. God loves capitalism. He created it.

No social morals for free; i got it.

I wish you did get it.

i do; it is why You have Only yourself to be accountable to, for Your fallacies.

No. It is not just me. It is everyone and it is not just fallacies it is everything.

in other words, you want a social bailout but don't want me to get one.

No. Not even close. Put down the bong.

 

[Mudda]

So you have nothing except your tired, disproven signature. Got it.

That seemed like quite a lot to me.

Do I have to remind you that your standards are extremely low?

My standards are quite high. You are the one who has normalized his deviance. Just do a compare and contrast with posts #384 and #385. It's not even close.

You're right, it's not close, I need real facts, you use alternative facts.

I gave you real facts. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.

Everyone here has disproven your sig. But I'm curious, what does this mean "They worship science but are the first to reject it"? When do people who believe in science reject it?

 

[danielpalos]

it is about the Socialism of equality regarding application of the law.

Which according to the socialism of socialism is equality via uniformity.

Standards, in other words. Our federal Congress is delegated that social Power, as well.

No. Not standards. Normalization of deviance. We have individual rights here. Not group rights.

Normalization of deviance for the public Good, is lawful. That requires group rights, not just selfish, individual rights.

No. Normalization of deviance is stupid and requires stupid people to believe it is for the public good. There is no such thing as group rights here, comrade.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights.

 

[ding]

That seemed like quite a lot to me.

Do I have to remind you that your standards are extremely low?

My standards are quite high. You are the one who has normalized his deviance. Just do a compare and contrast with posts #384 and #385. It's not even close.

You're right, it's not close, I need real facts, you use alternative facts.

I gave you real facts. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.

Everyone here has disproven your sig. But I'm curious, what does this mean "They worship science but are the first to reject it"? When do people who believe in science reject it?

No one has come close to refuting it because it is all true. In fact, it is starting to spread.

 

[ding]

Which according to the socialism of socialism is equality via uniformity.

Standards, in other words. Our federal Congress is delegated that social Power, as well.

No. Not standards. Normalization of deviance. We have individual rights here. Not group rights.

Normalization of deviance for the public Good, is lawful. That requires group rights, not just selfish, individual rights.

No. Normalization of deviance is stupid and requires stupid people to believe it is for the public good. There is no such thing as group rights here, comrade.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights.

No, dear, there are no group rights only individual rights.

 

[danielpalos]

Standards, in other words. Our federal Congress is delegated that social Power, as well.

No. Not standards. Normalization of deviance. We have individual rights here. Not group rights.

Normalization of deviance for the public Good, is lawful. That requires group rights, not just selfish, individual rights.

No. Normalization of deviance is stupid and requires stupid people to believe it is for the public good. There is no such thing as group rights here, comrade.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights.

No, dear, there are no group rights only individual rights.

How does that work for, US citizens?

 

[ding]

No. Not standards. Normalization of deviance. We have individual rights here. Not group rights.

Normalization of deviance for the public Good, is lawful. That requires group rights, not just selfish, individual rights.

No. Normalization of deviance is stupid and requires stupid people to believe it is for the public good. There is no such thing as group rights here, comrade.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights.

No, dear, there are no group rights only individual rights.

How does that work for, US citizens?

How does it not?

 

[danielpalos]

Normalization of deviance for the public Good, is lawful. That requires group rights, not just selfish, individual rights.

No. Normalization of deviance is stupid and requires stupid people to believe it is for the public good. There is no such thing as group rights here, comrade.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights.

No, dear, there are no group rights only individual rights.

How does that work for, US citizens?

How does it not?

US citizenship belongs to a group of individuals.

 

[ding]

No. Normalization of deviance is stupid and requires stupid people to believe it is for the public good. There is no such thing as group rights here, comrade.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights.

No, dear, there are no group rights only individual rights.

How does that work for, US citizens?

How does it not?

US citizenship belongs to a group of individuals.

Yes, but the contract is between the state and the person. You can't usurp one's rights to grant another's.

 

[danielpalos]

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights.

No, dear, there are no group rights only individual rights.

How does that work for, US citizens?

How does it not?

US citizenship belongs to a group of individuals.

Yes, but the contract is between the state and the person. You can't usurp one's rights to grant another's.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights

 

[ding]

No, dear, there are no group rights only individual rights.

How does that work for, US citizens?

How does it not?

US citizenship belongs to a group of individuals.

Yes, but the contract is between the state and the person. You can't usurp one's rights to grant another's.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights

You said that already. Now you are going in circles, dear.

 

[ding]

You already have that. No one is discriminating against filthy socialists just yet.

it is about the Socialism of equality regarding application of the law.

Which according to the socialism of socialism is equality via uniformity.

Standards, in other words. Our federal Congress is delegated that social Power, as well.

No. Not standards. Normalization of deviance. We have individual rights here. Not group rights.

Normalization of deviance for the public Good, is lawful. That requires group rights, not just selfish, individual rights.

Do you even know what normalization of deviance is?

 

[RWS]

according to the fantastical and (semi-)Religious right wing, the poor must "work or die"; as a moral from the Age of Iron.

Why in the world would you believe that according to the fantastical and (semi-)Religious right wing, the poor must "work or die"? Who told you that?

the right wing. where have you been?

More like you are talking out of your ass.

nope; i got it from them. allegedly, it is a moral from the Age of Iron, referenced in a Bible.

We both know better. Should we seriously expect a socialist to be able to define free enterprise without distorting the truth? Like I already told you before, Socialists are inherently liars and thieves masquerading as moralists. Socialism is inherently evil.

Everything you have written thus far to describe a Socialist, and that I have read, actually describes YOU and your posts!

The only person lying or cheating in these theads, is YOU!

The only people who have an understanding of morals and goodness, are the people YOU are calling socialists...

Meanwhile, you hide inside your box of righteousness, and don't even realize that you're calling yourself out...


So I guess I was wrong when I said there are no Socialists here, before...

You are the Socialist! By your own definition...

I know, you're not gonna like that, but again, step outside of your box and look at what you have been promoting.

 

[Mudda]

Do I have to remind you that your standards are extremely low?

My standards are quite high. You are the one who has normalized his deviance. Just do a compare and contrast with posts #384 and #385. It's not even close.

You're right, it's not close, I need real facts, you use alternative facts.

I gave you real facts. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.

Everyone here has disproven your sig. But I'm curious, what does this mean "They worship science but are the first to reject it"? When do people who believe in science reject it?

No one has come close to refuting it because it is all true. In fact, it is starting to spread.

So what does this mean "They worship science but are the first to reject it"? When do people who believe in science reject it?

 

[danielpalos]

How does that work for, US citizens?

How does it not?

US citizenship belongs to a group of individuals.

Yes, but the contract is between the state and the person. You can't usurp one's rights to grant another's.

You don't know what you are talking about, dear. Simply having a public sector involves the socialism of group rights

You said that already. Now you are going in circles, dear.

You just don't get it.

When are you going to read up on sovereign immunity, as it may apply to functionaries of government.