The Right To Bear Arms

Uh, so you believe that when the colonists came into North America, into unknown lands, that we came unarmed into a unknown and dangerous frontier? Why did King George demand confiscation of all firearms, to never give them back? Why worry about colonial firearms and seize them if they weren't prevalent. Did colonists not hunt? Were they all vegetarians. I think the burden of proof is on you to back your claim given the contrary evidence in early colonial America.

No, American's didn't fight over it, until it become a divisive political tool.

Speculation and hyperbole don't fair well in any logical discussion.

I've argued that the 2A's primary purpose is defense from a tyrannical gov't. Self defense is a secondary attribute that comes from the 2A. Along with the 2A, state constitutions, at the forming of the constitution also, back up the 2A, and a few states, are more specific when providing the right of citizens to be armed.
Sorry, I can't help you there -

 
Sorry, I can't help you there -

So you're going to claim technology deficiency to not have to respond? Cause you don't know how or use Multi-quote (and technically, it's not multi-quoting" to break up your post. Multi-quoting is quoting multiple posters in one reply.

Sheesh this is laziness.
 
So you're going to claim technology deficiency to not have to respond? Cause you don't know how or use Multi-quote (and technically, it's not multi-quoting" to break up your post. Multi-quoting is quoting multiple posters in one reply.

Sheesh this is laziness.
No, I don't suffer fools gladly. I don't sit in a pub with a mate and have a conversation in a multi-quote format. If you do, knock your pan in.
 
Wingnuts haven't said or done anything to convince anyone that assualt weapons are a part of the second ammendment so in that way, yes, it is obsolete.
We are using technology to communicate that the FF's could not imagine that allows us to communicate with thousands in an instant. Is the 1st obsolete because we can weaponize speech now and cause people to commit suicide? If you don't believe that, check into the number of teenagers killing themselves after being cyberbullied on social media.
 
I've also requested a comparison between an Assault Weapon and a Non-Assault Weapon several times. No response.

From the press accounts, the bright lights on the left think assault weapons have "high magazine clips" and "things that flip up on the shoulder". And they look Vewy Scawwwyyyy!!!
Most descriptions boil down to "big, black and scary-looking".
 
Good

For

You
Screenshot_20240923-135143.jpg
 
No assault weapons are sold in the US to anyone that hasn't passed a very exhaustive background check and paid a huge fee to own an automatic weapon. And in 17 states it is illegal to own one.

For the slow and stupid among us, an assault weapon is defined as a rifle that has a selector switch on it that allows the weapon to fire automatic fire. An AR-15 is not an assault weapon.
 
No, I don't suffer fools gladly. I don't sit in a pub with a mate and have a conversation in a multi-quote format. If you do, knock your pan in.
We don't operate by your rules. By quoting you we can allow new readers to get up to speed quicker and allow them to see your nonsense for what it is. If we didn't "suffer fools gladly" none of us would bother to reply to you. Be grateful that you are tolerated.
 
No assault weapons are sold in the US to anyone that hasn't passed a very exhaustive background check and paid a huge fee to own an automatic weapon. And in 17 states it is illegal to own one.

For the slow and stupid among us, an assault weapon is defined as a rifle that has a selector switch on it that allows the weapon to fire automatic fire. An AR-15 is not an assault weapon.
You are a bozo

Assault weapon



In the United States, assault weapon is a controversial term applied to different kinds of firearms. There is no clear, consistent definition. It can include semi-automatic firearms with a detachable magazine, a pistol grip, and sometimes other features, such as a vertical forward grip, flash suppressor, or barrel shroud. Wikipedia You don't know shit , you are just a mouth that is connected to fox news bu nor your own brain.
 
You are a bozo

Assault weapon



In the United States, assault weapon is a controversial term applied to different kinds of firearms. There is no clear, consistent definition. It can include semi-automatic firearms with a detachable magazine, a pistol grip, and sometimes other features, such as a vertical forward grip, flash suppressor, or barrel shroud. Wikipedia You don't know shit , you are just a mouth that is connected to fox news bu nor your own brain.
In other words, according to you, an assault weapon is any firearm that you fear and/or want banned.
 
You are a bozo

Assault weapon



In the United States, assault weapon is a controversial term applied to different kinds of firearms. There is no clear, consistent definition. It can include semi-automatic firearms with a detachable magazine, a pistol grip, and sometimes other features, such as a vertical forward grip, flash suppressor, or barrel shroud. Wikipedia You don't know shit , you are just a mouth that is connected to fox news bu nor your own brain.
It usually boils down to "big, black and scary looking".
 
In other words, according to you, an assault weapon is any firearm that you fear and/or want banned.
Doesn't matter.
Whatever you call them, they're in common use for traditionally lawful purposes.
This means they are "bearable arms".
The 2nd protects the right to use 'all bearable arms"; a ban on a firearm protected by the 2nd violates the Constitution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top