ScreamingEagle
Gold Member
- Jul 5, 2004
- 13,399
- 1,707
- 245
Well the corporations could choose to pay taxes rather than provide good wages, benefits, and retirement. It wouldn't be forced.
If companies don't provide these things then the government will continue to grow. We vote in this country so you can't just cut welfare and pretend that's going to fix everything. When companies don't provide it, the government will. I prefer that companies provide it.
don't you realize that the end consumer is the one who always pays.....? any product or service contains corporate taxes in the prices....
we need to cut taxes and regulations to the bone.....this will free up business and downsize government.....two goals that will free up Americans to become all that they can be....
That's why I say it can go to 0 for all I care. But I don't think employees of the largest companies in the country should be paid so little they collect welfare. Meanwhile CEO pay has gone from 20X the average worker to over 300X the average worker. As long as companies pay so little the government will grow.
if an ordinary person can create and build his own business without the interference of government and the burden of confiscatory taxes and invasaive regulations then he can call his own shots and most certainly get off welfare.....not everyone would rake in millions but if you work hard and smart anybody could become wealthy....good on the CEO who makes millions...
and with less govenment interference in business there would be more companies built and thus there would be more competition for workers which means their wages would go up...due to the market not directives from government...
under socialism and corporatism all you see is small companies going under and the big ones getting bigger....and welfare getting bigger and bigger....it's all about control....
Last edited: