The rules of engagement…

Rustic

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2015
58,769
5,895
1,940
They are so fucked up, they do not help our military at all... in fact they force them be helpless.
 
They are so fucked up, they do not help our military at all... in fact they force them be helpless.

If you are referring to the caravan, the military is needed to make sure these people don't get into the country. It's a "show of force". Meaning, we will not tolerate anyone to just come here whenever they feel like it and do whatever they want. That has to stop!
 
We have 2,000 in Syria to deal with terrorists.
We will have 15,000 in Arizona to deal with nannies and gardeners.

Trump is a fucking moron.
Those who support this policy are fucking morons.
Trump is trying to secure our borders from a foreign invasion helped along by scum dimocrats. Nothing moronic about that. Those people have no right to come here and most Americans are tired of paying for them.
 
We have 2,000 in Syria to deal with terrorists.
We will have 15,000 in Arizona to deal with nannies and gardeners.

Trump is a fucking moron.
Those who support this policy are fucking morons.
Trump is trying to secure our borders from a foreign invasion helped along by scum dimocrats. Nothing moronic about that. Those people have no right to come here and most Americans are tired of paying for them.
only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy. it is a Commerce issue.
 
We have 2,000 in Syria to deal with terrorists.
We will have 15,000 in Arizona to deal with nannies and gardeners.

Trump is a fucking moron.
Those who support this policy are fucking morons.
If those terrorists were trying to enter the US in force, do you think the US would have more than 2,000 troops dedicated to them? If so, you have no worthwhile argument.
 
We have 2,000 in Syria to deal with terrorists.
We will have 15,000 in Arizona to deal with nannies and gardeners.

Trump is a fucking moron.
Those who support this policy are fucking morons.
If those terrorists were trying to enter the US in force, do you think the US would have more than 2,000 troops dedicated to them? If so, you have no worthwhile argument.

false equivalency; thy name is Godboy
 
We have 2,000 in Syria to deal with terrorists.
We will have 15,000 in Arizona to deal with nannies and gardeners.

Trump is a fucking moron.
Those who support this policy are fucking morons.
If those terrorists were trying to enter the US in force, do you think the US would have more than 2,000 troops dedicated to them? If so, you have no worthwhile argument.

false equivalency; thy name is Godboy
Yes, you made a false equivalency. That has already been established by me. I see you STILL have no worthwhile argument.
 
We have 2,000 in Syria to deal with terrorists.
We will have 15,000 in Arizona to deal with nannies and gardeners.

Trump is a fucking moron.
Those who support this policy are fucking morons.
If those terrorists were trying to enter the US in force, do you think the US would have more than 2,000 troops dedicated to them? If so, you have no worthwhile argument.

false equivalency; thy name is Godboy
Yes, you made a false equivalency. That has already been established by me. I see you STILL have no worthwhile argument.

You’re equating the people the soldiers are fighting in the middle east with these migrants in central America. either you’re profoundly stupid or…. no there is no either/or here; you’re just profoundly stupid.
 
We have 2,000 in Syria to deal with terrorists.
We will have 15,000 in Arizona to deal with nannies and gardeners.

Trump is a fucking moron.
Those who support this policy are fucking morons.
If those terrorists were trying to enter the US in force, do you think the US would have more than 2,000 troops dedicated to them? If so, you have no worthwhile argument.

false equivalency; thy name is Godboy
Yes, you made a false equivalency. That has already been established by me. I see you STILL have no worthwhile argument.

You’re equating the people the soldiers are fighting in the middle east with these migrants in central America. either you’re profoundly stupid or…. no there is no either/or here; you’re just profoundly stupid.
You are still confused about your dumb comparison? That's probably because you're dumb. Stop embarrassing yourself.
 
They are so fucked up, they do not help our military at all... in fact they force them be helpless.
Do you even know what they are?
Rules of engagement - Wikipedia

They are obviously politically correct

Rules of Engagement are determined by DOD for the specific conflict the troops are involved with. Yes, most of them are stupid and put our troops in unnecessary danger.

Thus, it is going to be most interesting to see what the President and Secretary Mattis determine what the ROE will be for this upcoming confrontations at the border.
 
They are so fucked up, they do not help our military at all... in fact they force them be helpless.
Do you even know what they are?
Yes, here they are.

Regressive liberal ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

4. Ridicule spelling and typos, punctuation.

5. Attack the person as being juvenile, ie: "are you 12 years old", question their education, intelligence, Age

6. Employ misdirection,

6a. smear people

6b. attack religion

6c. attack your rationality.

7. Lie, make false assumptions

8. Play race/gender card/misogynist card

9. Play gay/lesbian card

10. Play the Nazi/Fascist/bigot card

11. Make up stuff/So you got nothing?

12. Deny constantly

13. Reword and repeat

14. Pretending not to understand, playing ignorant/what did I lie about

15. When losing, resort to personal attacks.

16. Russia

17. Fox News/Alex Jones/Brietbart/infowars/Stormfront/Gateway/hannity

18. You can’t read.

19. Trump Trump Trump TrumpTrump Trump
 

Forum List

Back
Top