"The Secret Service LIED to the American people about protecting President Trump and you have FIRED no one!?"

Cool with me. We can have presidential elections every few weeks after someone in an administration fails.
There is failing and then there is someone being murdered, an assassination attempt, and lies from the admin
 
Interestingly, there is a taller building just behind the one where the shooter was, which would have been an excellent position for an SS sniper team;
id5690447-computer1.jpg


If that diagram is accurate, that is a more than obvious threat point where the shooter was perched.
Reminds me of this…

 
Why would law enforcement want to disseminate that kind of thing? The only purpose of a manifesto to radicalize more people.
If a mass shooter ever left a manifesto saying he or she did it for Trump, the feds would put it out in no time flat, and the media would never stop talking about it.
 
If a mass shooter ever left a manifesto saying he or she did it for Trump, the feds would put it out in no time flat, and the media would never stop talking about it.
And MAGAs would invent a conspiracy that it had been written by the deep state and the mass shooter was actually a transgendered Antifa psyop.
 
what? first off, Trump doesn't support Project 2025, but moreover, what about it gets us "back in the 1950s" what does that even mean?
Sure he does, the authors of it are all pretty much Trump Humpers. Most of the policies in the plan are from the 50s and tell me Struth why does his name show up in Project 2025 312 times?
I haven't seen enough evidence to know if it did....I don't know if that was his motive or not.
You know too much of a coward to say.
Police are human beings and make mistakes...do you not think police are human beings? Do you not think humans make mistakes?
You think shooting an unarmed black woman in the face is a mistake?
Do I think Sonya Massey case was a mistake? absolutely....geez, she should never of been shot. Do you not think that was a mistake? You think she should have been?
That wasn't a damn mistake, he intentionally shot her, you boot licking negroes are a joke.
 
Last edited:
And MAGAs would invent a conspiracy that it had been written by the deep state and the mass shooter was actually a transgendered Antifa psyop.
That's the kind of crazy ideas people get when the government hides information.

Remember when some amateurish black bag men were caught breaking into the Democratic presidential campaign headquarters, and people had the insane idea that the sitting president himself was personally planning and directing a cover up?

Bad example, I guess. That insane idea turned out to be correct.

But, remember when people crazily thought that the government was violating the law Congress had passed banning funding the Contras in Nicaragua by selling U.S. arms at a profit and using the profit as an off the books slush fund to do exactly that? Pffffft!

Oh, wait. That one turned out to be true.

Remember when people had the crazy idea that Senior FBI officials were colluding to stop Trump from being elected?

Shit, that one was true, also.

Point being, when government hides something there is a reason. That reason is that government has something to hide.
 
I have no idea what you think you saw that you are being told didn't happen to Comment on that.
Several posters on this board believe that Trump was not shot, based on what their media is telling them.

I saw it myself, so I ain't gonna listen to their media.
 
Cool with me. We can have presidential elections every few weeks after someone in an administration fails.
The Democrats had an election just recently, to determine who would be their nominee.

Then they said, "ooooh, not a good choice. Sorry, we pick another.
 
That's the kind of crazy ideas people get when the government hides information.

Remember when some amateurish black bag men were caught breaking into the Democratic presidential campaign headquarters, and people had the insane idea that the sitting president himself was personally planning and directing a cover up?

Bad example, I guess. That insane idea turned out to be correct.
If Watergate took place now, the conservatives would be lining up to defend Nixon from the lying MSM. The base would never believe reporting coming out of the Washington Post. They'd defend Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre as well within the powers of the president and not a scandal.

The idea that Nixon was crooked never was thought to be a crazy idea. Bad example.
But, remember when people crazily thought that the government was violating the law Congress had passed banning funding the Contras in Nicaragua by selling U.S. arms at a profit and using the profit as an off the books slush fund to do exactly that? Pffffft!

Oh, wait. That one turned out to be true.
If Iran Contra took place now, conservatives would likewise be lining up to defend the president as having done nothing wrong. Oh wait, they already did that. Ollie North has been a right wing commentator for decades, even had his own show on Fox News.

The idea that Reagan would do whatever he wanted was never thought to be a crazy idea. Bad example.
Remember when people had the crazy idea that Senior FBI officials were colluding to stop Trump from being elected?

Shit, that one was true, also.
Yeah, it's not true. It's a fabrication of the deep state conspiracy theorists.
Point being, when government hides something there is a reason. That reason is that government has something to hide.
Bad examples because these are matters directly implicating the government. Hiding a manifesto has nothing to do with government malfeasance. It's rational to not publicize the manifestos. We don't need to give these people platforms.

Not that these manifestos are truly ever hidden. They're generally posted online and very available if you do a little searching and don't mind going on 4Chan or some crazy shit.
 
Sure he does, the authors of it are all pretty much Trump Humpers. Most of the policies in the plan are from the 50s and tell me Struth why does his name show up in Project 2025 312 times?

You know too much of a coward to say.

You think shooting an unarmed black woman in the face is a mistake?

That wasn't a damn mistake, he intentionally shot her, you boot licking negroes are a joke.
Are you black?
 
If Watergate took place now, the conservatives would be lining up to defend Nixon from the lying MSM. The base would never believe reporting coming out of the Washington Post. They'd defend Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre as well within the powers of the president and not a scandal.

The idea that Nixon was crooked never was thought to be a crazy idea. Bad example.

If Iran Contra took place now, conservatives would likewise be lining up to defend the president as having done nothing wrong. Oh wait, they already did that. Ollie North has been a right wing commentator for decades, even had his own show on Fox News.

The idea that Reagan would do whatever he wanted was never thought to be a crazy idea. Bad example.

Yeah, it's not true. It's a fabrication of the deep state conspiracy theorists.

Bad examples because these are matters directly implicating the government. Hiding a manifesto has nothing to do with government malfeasance. It's rational to not publicize the manifestos. We don't need to give these people platforms.

Not that these manifestos are truly ever hidden. They're generally posted online and very available if you do a little searching and don't mind going on 4Chan or some crazy shit.
Are you trying to be black?
 
Several posters on this board believe that Trump was not shot, based on what their media is telling them.

I saw it myself, so I ain't gonna listen to their media.

I saw some state he was hit with shrapnel but that's still being shot.

Unless you are reading conspiracy sites.
 

Forum List

Back
Top