Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Shocking Secret Behind ObamaCare Enrollment Numbers That ACA, exchanges, Medicaid, and young adult enrollments are far better than expected by any one, certainly the far reactionary right.
But not up to the rosy predictions you and your fellow Marx-O-Crats were touting.
Barack Obama wants you to know he enrolled 7.5 million Americans through ObamaCares health insurance Exchanges. What he doesnt want you to know is how.
Federal courts may soon rule that President Obama induced the majority of those enrollees to enroll by offering them taxpayer dollars he has no legal authority to spend.
If the courts put a stop to that unauthorized spending, a majority of Exchange enrollees would suddenly face the full cost of ObamaCare coverage, and enrollments would plummet.
....
The eligibility rules for the PPACAs Exchange subsidies specify nine times, without deviation, that recipients must enroll through an Exchange established by the State. House Democrats even complained about this part of the Senate-passed PPACA before they themselves approved it, so they knew exactly what they were sending to the presidents desk.
Confounding supporters expectations, 34 states declined to establish Exchanges. Under the plain terms of federal law, subsidies are therefore available in the 16 Exchanges established by states, and not available in the 34 Exchanges established by the federal government.
.....
In January of this year, the Obama administration began spending billions of dollars of unauthorized subsidies to induce Americans to enroll in the 34 Exchanges established by the federal government. The president is literally forcing taxpayers, without any legal authorization, to subsidize two out of every three Exchange enrollments.
The shocking secret behind ObamaCare enrollment numbers | Fox News
The original ACA required all states to particpate and create health insurance exchanges. Thus the language about subsidies in relation to those state exchanges.
Since the Supreme Court ruled that states can opt out of ObamaCare, that language obviously has to be changed, if it hasn't already been in separate legislation.
Sorry, but this isn't a "shocking secret" except to rubes who have no clue.
Most of the states which opted out of ObamaCare are red states. Splooging with glee in your pants that all those people in those states could get fucked out of their subsidies is not exactly good political strategy. The fact those same states have prevented their citizens from getting into the expanded Medicaid program is going to be used against the politicians who blocked them.
Federal courts may soon rule that President Obama induced the majority of those enrollees to enroll by offering them taxpayer dollars he has no legal authority to spend.
The Shocking Secret Behind ObamaCare Enrollment Numbers That ACA, exchanges, Medicaid, and young adult enrollments are far better than expected by any one, certainly the far reactionary right.
But not up to the rosy predictions you and your fellow Marx-O-Crats were touting.
Actually, the enrollment numbers have now exceeded all earlier rosy predictions.
Sorry!
Federal courts may soon rule that President Obama induced the majority of those enrollees to enroll by offering them taxpayer dollars he has no legal authority to spend.
Obama had no authority for the Fed govt to get involved in insurance at all.
That didn't stop him.
You think this will?
Only because they're doing it ILLEGALLY....
what happens when the courts make it official in a few months from now...?
Barack Obama wants you to know he enrolled 7.5 million Americans through ObamaCares health insurance Exchanges. What he doesnt want you to know is how.
Federal courts may soon rule that President Obama induced the majority of those enrollees to enroll by offering them taxpayer dollars he has no legal authority to spend.
If the courts put a stop to that unauthorized spending, a majority of Exchange enrollees would suddenly face the full cost of ObamaCare coverage, and enrollments would plummet.
....
The eligibility rules for the PPACAs Exchange subsidies specify nine times, without deviation, that recipients must enroll through an Exchange established by the State. House Democrats even complained about this part of the Senate-passed PPACA before they themselves approved it, so they knew exactly what they were sending to the presidents desk.
Confounding supporters expectations, 34 states declined to establish Exchanges. Under the plain terms of federal law, subsidies are therefore available in the 16 Exchanges established by states, and not available in the 34 Exchanges established by the federal government.
.....
In January of this year, the Obama administration began spending billions of dollars of unauthorized subsidies to induce Americans to enroll in the 34 Exchanges established by the federal government. The president is literally forcing taxpayers, without any legal authorization, to subsidize two out of every three Exchange enrollments.
The shocking secret behind ObamaCare enrollment numbers | Fox News
The original ACA required all states to particpate and create health insurance exchanges. Thus the language about subsidies in relation to those state exchanges.
Since the Supreme Court ruled that states can opt out of ObamaCare, that language obviously has to be changed, if it hasn't already been in separate legislation.
Sorry, but this isn't a "shocking secret" except to rubes who have no clue.
Most of the states which opted out of ObamaCare are red states. Splooging with glee in your pants that all those people in those states could get fucked out of their subsidies is not exactly good political strategy. The fact those same states have prevented their citizens from getting into the expanded Medicaid program is going to be used against the politicians who blocked them.
Actually, the enrollment numbers have now exceeded all earlier rosy predictions.
Sorry!
Only because they're doing it ILLEGALLY....
what happens when the courts make it official in a few months from now...?
The plaintiffs, three private employers and four individual taxpayers, had argued that people were only entitled to the subsidies if they lived in states that opted to set up their own insurance exchanges. Thirty-four states did not, leaving the task to the federal government.
They cited language in the law that said the subsidies would be available to those “enrolled through an Exchange established by the State.”
But District Court Judge Paul L. Friedman sided with the federal government, saying that the phrase was out of context. “One cannot look at just a few isolated words . . . but also must at least look at the other statutory provisions to which it refers,” Friedman wrote in his 39-page opinion.
Among the lawsuits challenging the Affordable Care Act, this one represented the “greatest existential threat,” said Ronald Pollack, executive director of Families USA, an advocacy group. “The fact that the judge has ruled so clearly and emphatically . . . protects the long term stability of the Affordable Care Act.”
The fact those same states have prevented their citizens from getting into the expanded Medicaid program is going to be used against the politicians who blocked them.
Uh...red states....and this will be used against them ?
Don't think so.
How did you come up with that idea ?
Demcrats are going to go after Republican incumbents with a vengeance.
The issue ads practically write themselves. Democratic candidates, and the SuperPACS and JFCs who support them, will run ads reminding everyone how the Republicans blocked the Medicaid expansion in their state, thus preventing voting citizens of their states from getting insured.
They will also run ads reminding everyone how the Republicans failed to build a state health insurance exchange, thus doing everything they could to stop people from getting insured.
How can you NOT see this coming?
Uh...red states....and this will be used against them ?
Don't think so.
How did you come up with that idea ?
Demcrats are going to go after Republican incumbents with a vengeance.
The issue ads practically write themselves. Democratic candidates, and the SuperPACS and JFCs who support them, will run ads reminding everyone how the Republicans blocked the Medicaid expansion in their state, thus preventing voting citizens of their states from getting insured.
They will also run ads reminding everyone how the Republicans failed to build a state health insurance exchange, thus doing everything they could to stop people from getting insured.
How can you NOT see this coming?
LOL, you haven't clue as to the mood of the public...stop ptetending you do.
There is outright rage on Main Street america, I listen to it every day.
Demcrats are going to go after Republican incumbents with a vengeance.
The issue ads practically write themselves. Democratic candidates, and the SuperPACS and JFCs who support them, will run ads reminding everyone how the Republicans blocked the Medicaid expansion in their state, thus preventing voting citizens of their states from getting insured.
They will also run ads reminding everyone how the Republicans failed to build a state health insurance exchange, thus doing everything they could to stop people from getting insured.
How can you NOT see this coming?
LOL, you haven't clue as to the mood of the public...stop ptetending you do.
There is outright rage on Main Street america, I listen to it every day.
When you see the issue ads, remember it was I who told you they were coming.
The Shocking Secret Behind ObamaCare Enrollment Numbers That ACA, exchanges, Medicaid, and young adult enrollments are far better than expected by any one, certainly the far reactionary right.
But not up to the rosy predictions you and your fellow Marx-O-Crats were touting.
You are wrong, and you know it,
You are wrong, and you know it,
You are wrong, and you know it, so you simply have to blow it,
You are wrong, and you know it.
You far right reactionary brown shirts are crying tears in your beers.
But not up to the rosy predictions you and your fellow Marx-O-Crats were touting.
You are wrong, and you know it,
You are wrong, and you know it,
You are wrong, and you know it, so you simply have to blow it,
You are wrong, and you know it.
You far right reactionary brown shirts are crying tears in your beers.
Damn, that was a mature response, for a second grader.
Barack Obama wants you to know he enrolled 7.5 million Americans through ObamaCares health insurance Exchanges. What he doesnt want you to know is how.
Federal courts may soon rule that President Obama induced the majority of those enrollees to enroll by offering them taxpayer dollars he has no legal authority to spend.
If the courts put a stop to that unauthorized spending, a majority of Exchange enrollees would suddenly face the full cost of ObamaCare coverage, and enrollments would plummet.
....
The eligibility rules for the PPACAs Exchange subsidies specify nine times, without deviation, that recipients must enroll through an Exchange established by the State. House Democrats even complained about this part of the Senate-passed PPACA before they themselves approved it, so they knew exactly what they were sending to the presidents desk.
Confounding supporters expectations, 34 states declined to establish Exchanges. Under the plain terms of federal law, subsidies are therefore available in the 16 Exchanges established by states, and not available in the 34 Exchanges established by the federal government.
.....
In January of this year, the Obama administration began spending billions of dollars of unauthorized subsidies to induce Americans to enroll in the 34 Exchanges established by the federal government. The president is literally forcing taxpayers, without any legal authorization, to subsidize two out of every three Exchange enrollments.
The shocking secret behind ObamaCare enrollment numbers | Fox News
yes because we should always take any article from Fox News seriously.
The numbers themselves are likely fake. This administration has no problem making things up to make themselves look better.
The numbers themselves are likely fake. This administration has no problem making things up to make themselves look better.
Actually, the enrollment numbers have now exceeded all earlier rosy predictions.
Sorry!
Only because they're doing it ILLEGALLY....
what happens when the courts make it official in a few months from now...?
The courts have ALREADY made it official!
Federal judge: No, the ObamaCare statute doesn’t limit subsidies to state-run exchanges
The plaintiffs, three private employers and four individual taxpayers, had argued that people were only entitled to the subsidies if they lived in states that opted to set up their own insurance exchanges. Thirty-four states did not, leaving the task to the federal government.
They cited language in the law that said the subsidies would be available to those “enrolled through an Exchange established by the State.”
But District Court Judge Paul L. Friedman sided with the federal government, saying that the phrase was out of context. “One cannot look at just a few isolated words . . . but also must at least look at the other statutory provisions to which it refers,” Friedman wrote in his 39-page opinion.
Among the lawsuits challenging the Affordable Care Act, this one represented the “greatest existential threat,” said Ronald Pollack, executive director of Families USA, an advocacy group. “The fact that the judge has ruled so clearly and emphatically . . . protects the long term stability of the Affordable Care Act.”
Sorry! ObamaCare is here to stay.
Like I said, this was a "shocking secret" only to the rubes. And that is because Fox News kept the full picture a secret from you. "We report (half truths), you decide!"
Last month, one of those lawsuits – Halbig v. Sebelius – went before a skeptical three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit.
After years of not articulating any statutory basis for its decision, the administration assured the court that the PPACA “makes clear that Congress expected the federal premium tax credits to be available on the federal exchange.”
How?
Through “a system of nested provisions that when you walk through them lead to the conclusion that the federal Exchange stands in the place of a state exchange.”
Oh.
No one disputes the purpose of a federal Exchange is to stand in the place of a state-established Exchange. The problem is the administration’s logical leap that an Exchange established by the federal government is somehow “established by the State.”
Judge Thomas B. Griffith, a George W. Bush appointee considered the panel’s swing vote, somewhat comically forced the administration to admit the tautology that an Exchange established by the federal government is not “established by the State.” He then explained, “the key language is who establishes the Exchange, and you just keep coming back to well, the Secretary establishes it.”
The D.C. Circuit likely will issue a ruling sometime in the coming months, as will the 4th Circuit, which will hear oral arguments in King v. Sebelius on May 14, another challenge to the legality of the subsidies. Two similar challenges, filed by the attorneys general in Oklahoma (Pruitt v. Sebelius) and Indiana (Indiana v. IRS), await consideration in federal district courts.
Billy000 said:yes because we should always take any article from Fox News seriously.
Barack Obama wants you to know he enrolled 7.5 million Americans through ObamaCares health insurance Exchanges. What he doesnt want you to know is how.
Federal courts may soon rule that President Obama induced the majority of those enrollees to enroll by offering them taxpayer dollars he has no legal authority to spend.
If the courts put a stop to that unauthorized spending, a majority of Exchange enrollees would suddenly face the full cost of ObamaCare coverage, and enrollments would plummet.
....
The eligibility rules for the PPACAs Exchange subsidies specify nine times, without deviation, that recipients must enroll through an Exchange established by the State. House Democrats even complained about this part of the Senate-passed PPACA before they themselves approved it, so they knew exactly what they were sending to the presidents desk.
Confounding supporters expectations, 34 states declined to establish Exchanges. Under the plain terms of federal law, subsidies are therefore available in the 16 Exchanges established by states, and not available in the 34 Exchanges established by the federal government.
.....
In January of this year, the Obama administration began spending billions of dollars of unauthorized subsidies to induce Americans to enroll in the 34 Exchanges established by the federal government. The president is literally forcing taxpayers, without any legal authorization, to subsidize two out of every three Exchange enrollments.
The shocking secret behind ObamaCare enrollment numbers | Fox News
