The Supreme Court Has Now Rebuked Trump

[IM2]

Chief Justice John Roberts has spoken and Trump won't like it.

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

Just hours after President Trump called for the impeachment of a judge who sought to pause the removal of more than 200 migrants to El Salvador, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. issued a rare public statement.

“For more than two centuries,” the chief justice said, “it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Mr. Trump had called the judge, James E. Boasberg, a “Radical Left Lunatic” in a social media post and said he should be impeached.

The exchange was reminiscent of one in 2018, when Chief Justice Roberts defended the independence and integrity of the federal judiciary after Mr. Trump called a judge who had ruled against his administration’s asylum policy “an Obama judge.”

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

www.nytimes.com

 

[martybegan]

Chief Justice John Roberts has spoken and Trump won't like it.

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

Just hours after President Trump called for the impeachment of a judge who sought to pause the removal of more than 200 migrants to El Salvador, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. issued a rare public statement.

“For more than two centuries,” the chief justice said, “it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Mr. Trump had called the judge, James E. Boasberg, a “Radical Left Lunatic” in a social media post and said he should be impeached.

The exchange was reminiscent of one in 2018, when Chief Justice Roberts defended the independence and integrity of the federal judiciary after Mr. Trump called a judge who had ruled against his administration’s asylum policy “an Obama judge.”

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

www.nytimes.com

That and $3.50 will get you an overpriced cup of coffee from Starbucks.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That's not for him to decide.

Congress impeaches not the Supreme Court.

 

[Polishprince]

Trump was just speaking his piece, like all Americans are allowed.

Its up to the House of Reps to decide if there are grounds for impeachment

Boasberg is an incompetent fool who doesn't have the legal brains to try a mattress tag vandalizer around here. But is incompetence a legal basis for impeachment is the question.

In this case, I see it as a "no harm no foul" kind of case. The Illegals have been successfully settled in El Salvador and won't be coming back.

 

[BackAgain]

Chief Justice John Roberts has spoken and Trump won't like it.

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

Just hours after President Trump called for the impeachment of a judge who sought to pause the removal of more than 200 migrants to El Salvador, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. issued a rare public statement.

“For more than two centuries,” the chief justice said, “it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Mr. Trump had called the judge, James E. Boasberg, a “Radical Left Lunatic” in a social media post and said he should be impeached.

The exchange was reminiscent of one in 2018, when Chief Justice Roberts defended the independence and integrity of the federal judiciary after Mr. Trump called a judge who had ruled against his administration’s asylum policy “an Obama judge.”

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

www.nytimes.com

The Chief Justice is allowed to offer his commentary on what President Trump said; but that’s not the same as a “rebuke” by “SCOTUS.”

Someone should pull the idiot, IQ2, aside and explain the difference to him.

 

[DGS49]

The Chief Justice is right. Of course.

This doesn't change the fact that these Leftist District Court justices are vastly exceeding their powers as granted by Congress, and they must be reeled in, otherwise they have the power, in effect, to nullify a national election.

I was shocked to see that Trump said this. (No I wasn't. It was typical).

 

[IM2]

That's not for him to decide.

Congress impeaches not the Supreme Court.

That judge should not be impeached because he opposed Trump's illegal bs. SCOTUS is the check on the legislative and executive, therefore he does have a say. Since trump is pushing boundaries and not playing by the rules, the courts should do the same.

 

[IM2]

The Chief Justice is right. Of course.

This doesn't change the fact that these Leftist District Court justices are vastly exceeding their powers as granted by Congress, and they must be reeled in, otherwise they have the power, in effect, to nullify a national election.

I was shocked to see that Trump said this. (No I wasn't. It was typical).

The only person exceeding their power is Trump.

 

[justoffal]

That and $3.50 will get you an overpriced cup of coffee from Starbucks.

It's $7.00 now

 

[justoffal]

That and $3.50 will get you an overpriced cup of coffee from Starbucks.

Boasberg's wife runs an NGO for immigrants.
Hmmmm.... He won't have to be impeached he will be recused.

 

[martybegan]

It's $7.00 now

I developed a sensitivity to caffeine and haven't really had any in 20 years.

Too many Mountain Dews, Jolt Colas and Dr Peppers as a kid and college student. We even made something called a "study bomb" which was 2 No-Doz pills crushed in a large coffee.

Thanks for updating me on the cost!

 

[justoffal]

I developed a sensitivity to caffeine and haven't really had any in 20 years.

Too many Mountain Dews, Jolt Colas and Dr Peppers as a kid and college student. We even made something called a "study bomb" which was 2 No-Doz pills crushed in a large coffee.

Thanks for updating me on the cost!

Jolt cola! Lol.... Used to love those!

 

[justoffal]

The only person exceeding their power is Trump.

 

[okfine]

Chief Justice John Roberts has spoken and Trump won't like it.

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

Just hours after President Trump called for the impeachment of a judge who sought to pause the removal of more than 200 migrants to El Salvador, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. issued a rare public statement.

“For more than two centuries,” the chief justice said, “it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Mr. Trump had called the judge, James E. Boasberg, a “Radical Left Lunatic” in a social media post and said he should be impeached.

The exchange was reminiscent of one in 2018, when Chief Justice Roberts defended the independence and integrity of the federal judiciary after Mr. Trump called a judge who had ruled against his administration’s asylum policy “an Obama judge.”

https://www.nytimes.com/20

http://

Chief Justice John Roberts has spoken and Trump won't like it.

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

Just hours after President Trump called for the impeachment of a judge who sought to pause the removal of more than 200 migrants to El Salvador, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. issued a rare public statement.

“For more than two centuries,” the chief justice said, “it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Mr. Trump had called the judge, James E. Boasberg, a “Radical Left Lunatic” in a social media post and said he should be impeached.

The exchange was reminiscent of one in 2018, when Chief Justice Roberts defended the independence and integrity of the federal judiciary after Mr. Trump called a judge who had ruled against his administration’s asylum policy “an Obama judge.”

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

www.nytimes.com

Trump got spanked and put in his place.

 

[justoffal]

The only person exceeding their power is Trump.

View attachment 1090883

 

[BackAgain]

The only person exceeding their power is Trump.

False.

 

[marvin martian]

Chief Justice John Roberts has spoken and Trump won't like it.

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

Just hours after President Trump called for the impeachment of a judge who sought to pause the removal of more than 200 migrants to El Salvador, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. issued a rare public statement.

“For more than two centuries,” the chief justice said, “it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Mr. Trump had called the judge, James E. Boasberg, a “Radical Left Lunatic” in a social media post and said he should be impeached.

The exchange was reminiscent of one in 2018, when Chief Justice Roberts defended the independence and integrity of the federal judiciary after Mr. Trump called a judge who had ruled against his administration’s asylum policy “an Obama judge.”

Rebuking Talk From Trump, Roberts Calls Impeaching Judges Over Rulings Improper

The chief justice rarely issues public statements. This one was reminiscent of another in 2018 defending judicial independence after the president criticized a different judge’s ruling.

www.nytimes.com

In related news, pigs say bacon tastes terrible and you shouldn't eat it.

 

[justoffal]

False.

The 238 prisoners are still in CECOT....
WILL WE BE SEEING A CONTINGENT OF SPANDEXED GEEN HAIRED FAT LIBERAL WOMEN Running DOWN THEE TO BREAK THEM OUT?

 

[justoffal]

Trump was just speaking his piece, like all Americans are allowed.

Its up to the House of Reps to decide if there are grounds for impeachment

Boasberg is an incompetent fool who doesn't have the legal brains to try a mattress tag vandalizer around here. But is incompetence a legal basis for impeachment is the question.

In this case, I see it as a "no harm no foul" kind of case. The Illegals have been successfully settled in El Salvador and won't be coming back.

His wife runs an NGO for immigrants.... Probably got money from USAID...

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Trump was just speaking his piece, like all Americans are allowed.

Its up to the House of Reps to decide if there are grounds for impeachment

Boasberg is an incompetent fool who doesn't have the legal brains to try a mattress tag vandalizer around here. But is incompetence a legal basis for impeachment is the question.

In this case, I see it as a "no harm no foul" kind of case. The Illegals have been successfully settled in El Salvador and won't be coming back.

The Star Chamber's Supernova

Outraged at Marbury changing the form of government into a judicial dictatorship, President Jefferson began to impeach the "Just Us"s one by one. That was based on a judicial decision, so the precedent was set.

As always, SCROTUS backed down when its self-granted privileges were challenged. They stated that judicial review was a "non-binding opinion." They waited things out before re-asserting their dictatorship.