Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I watched the video and the scanner they used really really sucked. I looked at the other images available around the web, and big fucking deal.
Again get scanned or ride a bike.
Again, how about you ride the bike instead of telling everyone else to hand more of their freedom over to the Federal government. You don't know how to respond to this, do you?
Show me in the constitution where it says you can get on a plane without going through security.
The world changed on 9-11-01, and if we don't change a little bit with it then we are fools and we are lost.
You don't like the security at Airports? Don't fly.
The Constitution does NOT limit our rights - it limits the powers of the federal government. So it is incumbent on you to show that fedgov has the authority to nationalize our airports and force passengers to go through security.
I watched the video and the scanner they used really really sucked. I looked at the other images available around the web, and big fucking deal.
Again get scanned or ride a bike.
Scanners are not effective. AND they are an invasion of privacy. The best thing to catch someone with the makings of a bomb is very low tech...a bomb sniffing dog.
I fly a fair amount, and airport security is a joke. I am a little fat redhead soon to be granny. I get patted down EVERY time I fly because if have a knee replacement. Show the card? Ohhellno, does no good whatsoever. I stand there getting shaken down while middle eastern thug types board the plane untouched.
If you want to see a REALLY big joke of an airport go to JFK in NY. I don't know how that place is still standing.
On what do you base your statement that they are not effective? And dogs are one of the easiest to fool. Ask any druggie.
The Constitution does NOT limit our rights - it limits the powers of the federal government. So it is incumbent on you to show that fedgov has the authority to nationalize our airports and force passengers to go through security.
Its under the Airports and security clause of the Constitution
If you can't find it there.....look under the "General Welfare" or "Interstate commerce" clause
Again, how about you ride the bike instead of telling everyone else to hand more of their freedom over to the Federal government. You don't know how to respond to this, do you?
Show me in the constitution where it says you can get on a plane without going through security.
The world changed on 9-11-01, and if we don't change a little bit with it then we are fools and we are lost.
You don't like the security at Airports? Don't fly.
mr. Fucktard Sir:
The Constitution does NOT limit our rights - it limits the powers of the federal government. So it is incumbent on you to show that fedgov has the authority to nationalize our airports and force passengers to go through security.
.
Scanners are not effective. AND they are an invasion of privacy. The best thing to catch someone with the makings of a bomb is very low tech...a bomb sniffing dog.
I fly a fair amount, and airport security is a joke. I am a little fat redhead soon to be granny. I get patted down EVERY time I fly because if have a knee replacement. Show the card? Ohhellno, does no good whatsoever. I stand there getting shaken down while middle eastern thug types board the plane untouched.
If you want to see a REALLY big joke of an airport go to JFK in NY. I don't know how that place is still standing.
On what do you base your statement that they are not effective? And dogs are one of the easiest to fool. Ask any druggie.
Scanners would not have stopped 9-11 OR the Christmas day bomber.
Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo. -Lee Iacocca
\
Scanners wouldn't have picked up box cutters? Really? We don't even know for certain how they got them through the security that we did have. I'm not an expert but Scanners are the next best thing we've got to a full body cavity search.
On what do you base your statement that they are not effective? And dogs are one of the easiest to fool. Ask any druggie.
Scanners would not have stopped 9-11 OR the Christmas day bomber.
Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo. -Lee Iacocca
Scanners wouldn't have picked up box cutters? Really? We don't even know for certain how they got them through the security that we did have. I'm not an expert but Scanners are the next best thing we've got to a full body cavity search.
You know that this is going to be abused to hell and back.
And the crotch bomber was not a failure of the right equipment, but a failure in operational procedures.
We were told that when the started the TSA, they would be 'professional.' I have my doubts.
Before they can have these toys, they need to prove better that they can be trusted. So far, that proof is wanting.
What passes for security now is ludicrous. It is ridiculous for grannies to be the hottest suspects they have. Totally ludicrous.
A team of non-Arabic female suicide bombers has been sent to attack targets in the West, it is feared.
Security officials have been warned to be on the look-out for the women, carrying Western passports, who are believed to have escaped an attack on an Al Qaeda terror camp in Yemen.
You know that this is going to be abused to hell and back.
And the crotch bomber was not a failure of the right equipment, but a failure in operational procedures.
We were told that when the started the TSA, they would be 'professional.' I have my doubts.
Before they can have these toys, they need to prove better that they can be trusted. So far, that proof is wanting.
You do know that the people in AMSTERDAM who let the underwear guy on the plane don't work for our TSA, right?
What passes for security now is ludicrous. It is ridiculous for grannies to be the hottest suspects they have. Totally ludicrous.
Lets exempt grannies from security checks. Then all Al Qaeda has to do is pay some "granny" in need of money to smuggle something through a checkpoint.
You know that this is going to be abused to hell and back.
And the crotch bomber was not a failure of the right equipment, but a failure in operational procedures.
We were told that when the started the TSA, they would be 'professional.' I have my doubts.
Before they can have these toys, they need to prove better that they can be trusted. So far, that proof is wanting.
You do know that the people in AMSTERDAM who let the underwear guy on the plane don't work for our TSA, right?
And they are probably laughing it up right now. WE need to know who is headed for our shores. If WE say he can't get on the plane and come here then WE have the control. As to the Christmas day bomber there WAS intel that would have stopped him. WE ignored it.
Knowing who is flying is the best tact we can take. Yes, I know how many thousands fly every day. But we have computers who have booked them in, it would take only a little more to check them all out.
What passes for security now is ludicrous. It is ridiculous for grannies to be the hottest suspects they have. Totally ludicrous.
Lets exempt grannies from security checks. Then all Al Qaeda has to do is pay some "granny" in need of money to smuggle something through a checkpoint.
Where did I say they need to be 'exempt?' I didn't. But the ones who are exempt NOW are middle aged middle eastern men who fit the profile of hijackers and terrorists and they cruise right on in while they are shaking down the grannies with joint replacements.
You do know that the people in AMSTERDAM who let the underwear guy on the plane don't work for our TSA, right?
And they are probably laughing it up right now. WE need to know who is headed for our shores. If WE say he can't get on the plane and come here then WE have the control. As to the Christmas day bomber there WAS intel that would have stopped him. WE ignored it.
Knowing who is flying is the best tact we can take. Yes, I know how many thousands fly every day. But we have computers who have booked them in, it would take only a little more to check them all out.
Damn Sunshine, we don't even know who is already here. Our borders are wide open and there is no one in Washington who gives a shit. Airline security is the only thing they've actually made any better at all and you want to fight them on that.
Lets exempt grannies from security checks. Then all Al Qaeda has to do is pay some "granny" in need of money to smuggle something through a checkpoint.
Where did I say they need to be 'exempt?' I didn't. But the ones who are exempt NOW are middle aged middle eastern men who fit the profile of hijackers and terrorists and they cruise right on in while they are shaking down the grannies with joint replacements.
But the bleeding hearts say we aren't allowed to profile, it's not fair.
And here i thought that security against terrorism during a time of war against terrorism.
And since we've just had an Airliner nearly blown up it sort of brings home the point that security on aircraft is kind of necessary in todays world. .
And they are probably laughing it up right now. WE need to know who is headed for our shores. If WE say he can't get on the plane and come here then WE have the control. As to the Christmas day bomber there WAS intel that would have stopped him. WE ignored it.
Knowing who is flying is the best tact we can take. Yes, I know how many thousands fly every day. But we have computers who have booked them in, it would take only a little more to check them all out.
